User talk:Bildete

Welcome

Hello Bildete and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Jewish pogroms in Amsterdam, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Bildete, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivan Mazepa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruthenian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for ensuring that some articles look like shit and are impossible to read

Unfortunately, our disagreement is not limited to the ethnic attribution of some historical figures. By undoing my edit You successfully deleted a lot of information added by me to an article, which I am not going to restore for a second time, because I suspect by now that your aim is to keep the quality of Wikipedia articles related to a particular topic artificially low, so that eventually most of their content will be deleted. It is useless to edit an article if one's edits will be deleted anyway.

Nazi concentration camps

Please see Talk:Identification of inmates in Nazi concentration camps --Altenmann >talk 20:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

I see from Portal talk:Current events/2025 February 27 that you've apparently given up on adding this holiday to the Current Events page. That's good, because you've already broken the three revert rule a couple times over, so it's already within my discretion to block you from editing. I'm not doing that at this time.

Also, vandalism has a specific meaning on Wikipedia, and "an unregistered user changed something I edited" does not fall into it. (Especially when they're right.) Calling non-vandalism edits "vandalism" is a personal attack, which is also blockable, so please, cut it out. —Cryptic 10:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bildete. Thank you for your work on Judaszki. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

this phrase isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:38, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bildete. Thank you for your work on Zbrodnie w Leonówce. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

"Zbrodnie" isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smorzhiv, Lviv Oblast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radziechów.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Witam
Please stop reverting edits on page 2025 Polish presidential election!
Nobody agree with you, but if you want to convince editors to you opinion, you should start discussion on the talk page. You won't convince people if you keep reverting edits - and such action can only end with a ban for you. Szturnek_¿? 19:45, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, The first thing I do was to use talk page, if you look there you would see. I already convinced one of the participants https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2025_Polish_presidential_election&oldid=1279967027. "Have it your way" let's keep it to the facts (not speculations, opinions, predictions, fillings) the facts that are here: https://wybory.gov.pl/prezydent2025/en/kandydaci Bildete (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Afghan emigrants to Portugal has been nominated for splitting

Category:Afghan emigrants to Portugal has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 03:54, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Moroccan mass murderers has been nominated for splitting

Category:Moroccan mass murderers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 03:56, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hi there. I saw your nomination for deletion at Katarzyna Cichos. You haven’t created a deletion discussion so I have removed it. If you would like to create a deletion discussion and renominate it, then that’s fine. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 13:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Amsterdam stabbing attack, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Belgian, Polish and American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 presidential candidates

Hi, you have recently added mentions to the lead section of candidates for the 2025 Polish presidential election about their candidacy. I understand that this is a practice at the Polish Wikipedia, however in my opinion these mentions can be contrary with the English Wikipedia policy of what is noteworthy to put in the lead section of a biography in regards to most recent events, see MOS:LEADBIO. Please note that the information about person standing in the election, becomes dated right after the election is over and has to be removed, as its not a major activity of the person (this is with exceptions, when the person became notable for standing for a specific election or repeatedly runs for an office, e.g. Szymon Hołownia who became notable in Polish politics when running for the office in 2020, or Rafał Trzaskowski who advanced to second round). Therefore I opt for removing these mentions from lead sections of Zandberg, Senyszyn or Biejat. — Antoni12345 (talk) 13:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bildete reported by User:XYZ1233212 (Result: ). Thank you. XYZ1233212 (talk) 11:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ivan Litvinchuk

Hello, Bildete,

Thank you for creating Ivan Litvinchuk.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Subject of article seems notable. More details are needed on fact " a war criminal" which is mentioned in lead. Article says he was imprisoned, but can more words be added that describe which sources conclude " a war criminal"? What words do the sources use? Which sources?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Portal:Current events/2025 May 22. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Floyd. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 19:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Please also read the talk header section of pages in this topic area for possible additional information and editing restrictions. It does not appear that this notice has been posted to your talk page. If it has already been left already by another editor, please let me know. If you have questions, please request help at the Teahouse. // Timothy :: talk 00:54, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Problem editing on articles related to Poland and Ukraine

I have left a Contentious topics warning above. From this point on you will be expected to understand the special restrictions when editing topics related to Eastern Europe.

Re: Your inappropriate changes, slow moving edit war, and personal attacks on other editors.

On June 3 you made this change: [1], which was reverted. You made the same change on June 16 [2], which again was reverted, then you again made the same change on June 22 [3]. This is clearly a slow moving edit war and it needs to stop. Two other editors in addition to myself object to your changes. Before continuing editing you are strongly advised to read Wikipedia:Edit warring and the special restrictions related to topics in Eastern Europe I placed above. Before making this change again, you need to gain WP:CONSENSUS for the change on the article talk page.

Regarding the source you use [4], this is a political statement on a government website; Wikipedia requires neutral independent reliable sources. Before you continue editing please read WP:RS. Questions about this can be answered at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.

I have also noticed you changed "massacre" to "genocide" in the template at [5]. The name of the article is clearly Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia; the article discusses the claim that this constitutes genocide, but this is not the consensus of historians (outside of Poland). After being reverted you repeated this again at [6]. There is a significant difference between "massacre" to "genocide"; if you wish to make this significant change you will need to show there is a consensus of neutral independent reliable sources and a consensus of Wikipedia editors to make this change.

Finally also accuse another editor of being a sockpuppet in your edit summary at [7] and accuse other editors of genocide denial [8], [9]. If you accuse any other editor of genocide denial, you will need very good evidence and be prepared to defend your comments at WP:ANI.

Again please read: WP:EW, WP:CONSENSUS, WP:RS, WP:NPOV and the special restrictions mentioned in the notice I placed above; if you have questions, post either to WP:TEAHOUSE or the appropriate notice board. Given your history of problematic editing (see User talk:Bildete), I would strongly suggest you read and follow these guidelines. After reviewing your edit history, I believe you should be blocked from editing articles related to Poland, Ukraine and genocide. In the event this problem continues this will be discussed at WP:ANI and you may be blocked from editing, either entirely or from the topics I mentioned.

// Timothy :: talk 00:54, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rudnitsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rudnica.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Świniarski

Hello Bildete,

I'm Significa liberdade, and I patrol new pages here on Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged a page that you created (Świniarski) for deletion because it is an unnecessary disambiguation page per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:07, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

intitle

Template:intitle does not distinguish diacritics. Therefore

redundant, it is enough to add

All pages with titles containing Pienkowski

--Altenmann >talk 09:42, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

plural: Świniarscy

This is English-language Wikipedia. Do not put "plural: ...scy" for Polish surnames, because in English plural is Świniarskis. --Altenmann >talk 09:46, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Ukrainian nobility of Galicia, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name does not follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Moves of this page have been flagged as a potentially controversial move, therefore if you wish the title to be changed you need to start a formal discussion through WP:RM. Thanks. — Amakuru (talk) 10:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done I did this. Please !vote there. --Altenmann >talk 19:35, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Far-right politics in Ukraine. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 17:33, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Piotr Szczerek

The article Piotr Szczerek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Do we really want an encyclopedia article about a stupid tennis fan? This guy's only claim to fame and inclusion was taking a hat from a boy in the crowd. Is that encyclopedic? Sounds more like tabloid fodder. 5 years from now this article will be ridiculous.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kur coat of arms

added a link pointing to Kurski

Ossorya coat of arms

added a link pointing to Kurski

Prawdzic coat of arms

added a link pointing to Kurski

Rogala coat of arms

added a link pointing to Kurski

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Decarlos Brown Jr.

A tag has been placed on Decarlos Brown Jr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

per BLPCRIME

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TurboSuperA+_[talk] 20:27, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Decarlos Brown Jr." listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Decarlos Brown Jr. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 8 § Decarlos Brown Jr. until a consensus is reached. TurboSuperA+_[talk] 20:39, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

surname pages

They are surnames. DO not add "other" with titles that include the surname: [10] Even in disambig pages we do not include arbitrary titles, see WP:PARTIAL. I included the square becaause it can be called simply "Szczepański". --Altenmann >talk 17:35, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anton-surname

Please do not put disambiguation pages into templates. It creates problems for wikipedia. You have to split name or surname pages out of disambig pages if you want to use tghem in surname templates.

By the way, I fail to see why you added Anthos into Template:Anton-surname: It does not list any surnames. --Altenmann >talk 19:11, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is so common that it is used for sure like a surname, just quick Google [11], but if you not happy with it you free to change it, either way for sure it's used like a surname Bildete (talk) 19:16, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please get yourself familiar with our rules WP:CITE, WP:RS . A google search is not a valid argument. It is not I am happy or unhappy. It is whether it follows Wikipedia rules. The link from ancestry is meaningless. This is their standard message when they do not know the origin of a surname. The real reference from ancestry looks like this. --Altenmann >talk 19:38, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Antonik

When you add the surname template, you have to remove all surnames of this type from the "See also", because they are already in the template and listing them in "See also" is redundant and confusing. --Altenmann >talk 19:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Antuna

Please do not add into surname pages the items which are not obvious without references. It is not at all clear that "Antuna" is somehow related to Antonius. And the Lebanese surname Antun in Farah Antun is also of unknown origin. --Altenmann >talk 19:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even if this is only name- in Christian Arabs, Antun is a transliteration of the Arabic name, a form of the Latin name Antonius Bildete (talk) 19:54, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And Finnish Antonen is in no way related to Anton. --Altenmann >talk 19:29, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is "The surname Antonen is primarily a Finnish surname derived from the Latin given name Antonius, meaning "priceless". Although the name also has roots in other Slavic regions, the Finnish origin of the name Antonen is the most evident, and can also be found in Sweden in the form of a patronymic." Bildete (talk) 19:31, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No it is not. Show me the reference from a reliable source, not some arbitrary "list of baby names". --Altenmann >talk 19:34, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://lastnames.myheritage.nl/last-name/antonen#:~:text=Origin%20and%20meaning%20of%20the,1910 or https://www.wisdomlib.org/names/anttonen Bildete (talk) 19:36, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BOth links are not valid reference for Wikipedia, and the second one is for diferent surnamee, Anttonen. YOu have to always the qquality of a website: whether is someone's hobby, like your two links, or a wiki or other kind of crowdsourcing. --Altenmann >talk 19:44, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

True I didn't research just Google, but Finnish use suffix '-en' and name Anthony in Finnish is fi:Anton and fi:Antton, so there is really no other option or you have some source to prove me wrong Bildete (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pleased do not go in this direction. WP:RS is the only option. There is no finnish suffix -en. --Altenmann >talk 21:24, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about Finnish names: "Common suffixes are -nen (in oblique form -se-; e.g., Miettinen : Miettisen "Miettinen's"). Initially it was a diminutive suffix usually meaning "small", "junior", and -la/-lä, a locative suffix usually meaning "(place) of". The -nen suffix was freely interchanged with -son or -poika as late as the 16th century, but its meaning was ambiguous as it could refer not only to a "son", but any member of a patriarch's family, a farm or even a place. For example, the surname Tuomonen could mean "Son of Tuomo" or "Farm of Tuomo" or something else belonging to Tuomo. Over time the suffix '-nen' lost its original meaning and became a generic surname-deriving suffix for surnames of so-called Virtanen type, see examples below."

Let's turn the table you give me source that I'm wrong, because for me it's self-explanatory that with given names with Anthony root fi:Anton and fi:Antton, surnames Antonen and Anttonen are also connected to Anthony Bildete (talk) 21:51, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Once again there is no Finnish suffix -en. You cannot even read what you wrote. No, there is no turning tables in Wikipedia on the issue. YOu are making a claim about surname origin, and you have to prove it with sources. Period. WP:RS is a non-negotiable Wikipedia rule. --Altenmann >talk 21:55, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just quote wikipedia article Finnish names, where clearly stays ""Common suffixes are -nen". No you are claiming that it is not. It's obvious it is. I also give you Finnish wikipedia article about names. How about this https://www.nordicnames.de/wiki/Anton#cite_note-mel-5 and https://www.nordicnames.de/wiki/Antton so those name are versions of Anthony Bildete (talk) 22:25, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

for the thrd time no finnish suffix -en. You really have to stop arguing linguistic subjects if you do not see the difference between -en and -nen. FYI I know about Finnish surnames quite well. I even wrote article Virtanen type. Please dont give me external links that do not mention surname Antonen. --Altenmann >talk 22:37, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, if you do not know for sure the origin of a surname, do not try to guess from its spelling and do not list it. If you are really curious you can leave a question about surname origin in the surname talk page. --Altenmann >talk 19:29, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

srt

Please add template {{srt}} only to given name pages, because in includes the link {{starts with}}, which is useful only for first names, which can start article title. Everywhere else it only creaates clutter. --Altenmann >talk 02:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Poland men's national 3x3 team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Hicks.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bildete. Thank you for your work on Kruszwick cathedral. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

nothing about it being a cathedral is mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Bildete! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:58, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Polish speedway season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fredrik Lindgren and Robert Lambert.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Template:Other

Template:Other is used for WP:DISAMBIGUATION pages and none of those that you added are disambiguations. I advise you to stop, because you have already been warned multiple times for edit warring and additions of contentious content. – sbaio 04:09, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, those titles are ambiguous. Modern, old, tribe, Polish and Jewish Lithuanians are perfect example for disambiguation.

You please stop, your childish behavior as deleting discussion from your page, not once but twice. I haven't been warned, I been automatically notified by bot of a link I put to some disambiguation page.

So yeah it's very ambiguous, I see you take it very personal and nationalistic, but I just want to do technical clarification Bildete (talk) 20:42, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbaio: Bildete (talk) 20:44, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I already wrote, you have no idea what that template is for and you refuse to read template's documentation and the WP:DISAMBIGUATION guideline. There is no Lithuanians (disambiguation) page. And template is exactly for that. In addition, you have been warned and blocked for edit warring so reconsider your behavior. And your messages on my talk page were certainly not discussions, but messages left out of frustration. The I see you take it very personal and nationalistic writing is a personal attack so read WP:NPA if you wish to continue making edits. – sbaio 02:26, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbaio: It looks like you did not read template documentation yourself. It gives use example that does not require the existence of sbaio (disambiguation) page:

{{Other uses|A|B}} results in

For other uses, see A and B.

Therefore Bildete's edits are formally valid. --Altenmann >talk 03:40, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Altenmann: People looking for Lithuanians will certainly know what they are looking for. The only page that falls under disambiguation is Lithuanians (tribe) page, and I did not say that a disambiguation page must be created. A good example would be Polish–Lithuanian identity page where a different template is used, and there is a Polish–Lithuanian disambiguation page that includes similarly named pages. Meanwhile, Bildete is trying to add pages that cause no confusion. – sbaio 05:09, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbaio: You cannot tell what people know and what they are looking for. I know for sure that quite a few English sources confusingly translate the words Litvaks/Litvins as "Lithuanians". --Altenmann >talk 05:13, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

People know exactly what they are looking for so do not defend misuse of a template. If Bildete is confused by the term "Lithuanians" then it is that editor's problem. In addition, I believe you should re-check your sources, because I have never seen any scholars that would confuse all those terms. – sbaio 05:22, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot speak for all people. The fact that you "never seen" say nothing: you didnt see everything. --Altenmann >talk 06:18, 3 October 2025 (UTC) here and ovviously erroneous use, - just a couple examples from books. --Altenmann >talk 06:37, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please resolve your disagreement in Talk:Lithuanians#Revert_war_about_hatnotes. --Altenmann >talk 06:33, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrainian nationalism flag

Hello, I've reverted your edit on Ukrainian nationalism and have started a discussion at talk:Ukrainian nationalism#Article image. If you disagree, please revert my edit at template:Ukrainian nationalism (but not at Ukrainian nationalism since this would be WP:EDITWARRING) and contribute to the discussion. Thanks for your work adding the series box to pages by the way, I had no idea it existed. Cheers. Joko2468 (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a section to the page here: Flag of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army#Meaning. Hopefully it addresses your concerns? Thanks. Joko2468 (talk) 18:02, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Hello, I'm Rosbif73. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Guillaume V, Grand Duke of Luxembourg, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Specifically, I see zero reliable sources that refer to him as William. If you are aware of any sources, feel free to add them to the article. Rosbif73 (talk) 13:11, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP:ANI regarding your behavior

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Bildete with WP:BATTLEGROUND, WP:IDHT and general WP:UNCIVIL behavior. – sbaio 14:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Lithuanian occupation of the Vilnius Region" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lithuanian occupation of the Vilnius Region has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 11 § Lithuanian occupation of the Vilnius Region until a consensus is reached. +JMJ+ (talk) 18:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. asilvering (talk) 22:21, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You are topic-banned from Poland and Lithuania, broadly construed, for one year.

You have been sanctioned for battleground behaviour, personal attacks, and other uncivil conduct, as discussed in the ANI thread here: [12]

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with this topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this topic ban using the appeal process and the arbitration enforcement appeals template. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this topic ban, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. ~~~~

, asilvering (talk) 22:28, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At ANI, you stated your intent to appeal the tban. You may do so at WP:AE directly. I don't recommend doing so, but I cannot and will not stop you. If you believe that other participants in the ANI thread ought to be sanctioned for their behaviour in WP:CT/EE, and you would like to bring a case against them at WP:AE, please let me know. -- asilvering (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering Thanks for bringing other behavior, yeah it's really bothering...

I was hoping, if you put it on me, you could lifted yourself with out starting whole procedure. It's bit ridiculous that the person who brings only facts and discuss on topic, then it's personally attack (antilithuanian, fringe, not speaking English, even Russian disinformation) and now is censored in topic for a year.

So does it include discussion too, not only editions, that even more unjust.

here it's all started Talk:Lithuanians#Revert war about hatnotes where you are going to see I'm always on topic, no person attacks and as it been noticed by other user "general remark about nationalist historical narratives", any so called antilithuanian attacks
Maybe also it's good to clarify if Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic existed, according to this consensus is even preferred usage.
Another one if this discussion Great Lithuanians stealhty deletion, than Talk:Lithuania proper#Merge proposal doesn't go as planned, so another one is open here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Lithuanians and then here Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard#Great Lithuanians, Historical Lithuanians, Old Lithuanians
The newest thing, presentism removing Wilno then name of Vilnius [13] [14]

Bildete (talk) 19:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I will not lift your topic ban. You have personally attacked other editors in the area and have demonstrated a clear battleground mentality. However, I don't want to leave only one "side" of a dispute sanctioned if the other side was also editing disruptively, so if you have evidence of disruptive behaviour that predates your own sanction, I may be willing to waive your tban for the sole purpose of bringing that case to AE. So far, it does not appear to me that you have any such case. The issue about what to do with the Great/Historical/Old Lithuanians topic is still ongoing at WP:FRINGE and does not appear to need AE intervention at this point. Please be aware that discussing behaviour that occurred after your own sanction is unambiguously a violation of your tban and you can be blocked for it unilaterally by any administrator. -- asilvering (talk) 19:52, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:41, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Great Lithuanians. Thank you. -- Pofka 19:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pofka, this editor cannot participate in that thread, since they've been topic-banned from Poland and Lithuania. -- asilvering (talk) 20:46, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban violation

Hi, your creation of the redirect to Maja Heban from her birth name was a violation of your topic ban from Poland. Additionally, it was a violation of MOS:GID: we do not include trans people's birthnames anywhere unless they were clearly notable under that name, and as the name was removed from the article when you added it you should have been aware this was at the very least disputed. This is considered a serious privacy violation, especially for a WP:BLP. Rusalkii (talk) 19:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're also making edits related to Polish surnames, which as I recall is the locus of the dispute that led to your topic ban. (eg: [15]). Please consider this your final warning. -- asilvering (talk) 22:38, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You banned me from topic of "Poland and Lithuania", (not or) and I deliberately avoided those topics. Bildete (talk) 09:04, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is a misinterpretation of your topic bans. You are topic-banned from two contentious topic areas. That contentious topics page explains that Poland is a subtopic, and Lithuania is a subtopic, and topic bans and page bans may be issued "from the entire contentious topic, a subtopic, or specified pages within the topic". You are topic-banned from Poland, broadly construed, and you are topic-banned from Lithuania, broadly construed. I hope this helps you understand. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:33, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is not what "and" mean and why should I be broadly ban if the "controversy" was at the crossroad of Polish and Lithuanian topic, it's already ridiculous enough I couldn't take part in discussion on the topic. How completing the surname list could be any controversial? Bildete (talk) 14:21, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are now in Wikipedia:FAFO territory. Good luck to you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bildete, I am sorry to tell you, but in English, that is indeed what "and" means. -- asilvering (talk) 23:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bildete. It has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

asilvering (talk) 04:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CSD G5 Żelazowski

Hello I have nominated your article Żelazowski for speedy deletion under the G5 criteria of Speedy deletion for being created by a topic banned editor. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 18:27, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CSD G5 Gawlikowski

Hello I have nominated your article Gawlikowski for speedy deletion under the G5 criteria of Speedy deletion for being created by a topic banned editor. GothicGolem29 (Talk) 18:28, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]