User talk:Bildete

Welcome

Hello Bildete and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Jewish pogroms in Amsterdam, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Bildete, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^Read! Talk! 03:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivan Mazepa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruthenian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for ensuring that some articles look like shit and are impossible to read

Unfortunately, our disagreement is not limited to the ethnic attribution of some historical figures. By undoing my edit You successfully deleted a lot of information added by me to an article, which I am not going to restore for a second time, because I suspect by now that your aim is to keep the quality of Wikipedia articles related to a particular topic artificially low, so that eventually most of their content will be deleted. It is useless to edit an article if one's edits will be deleted anyway.

Nazi concentration camps

Please see Talk:Identification of inmates in Nazi concentration camps --Altenmann >talk 20:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

I see from Portal talk:Current events/2025 February 27 that you've apparently given up on adding this holiday to the Current Events page. That's good, because you've already broken the three revert rule a couple times over, so it's already within my discretion to block you from editing. I'm not doing that at this time.

Also, vandalism has a specific meaning on Wikipedia, and "an unregistered user changed something I edited" does not fall into it. (Especially when they're right.) Calling non-vandalism edits "vandalism" is a personal attack, which is also blockable, so please, cut it out. —Cryptic 10:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bildete. Thank you for your work on Judaszki. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

this phrase isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:38, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bildete. Thank you for your work on Zbrodnie w Leonówce. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

"Zbrodnie" isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smorzhiv, Lviv Oblast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radziechów.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Witam
Please stop reverting edits on page 2025 Polish presidential election!
Nobody agree with you, but if you want to convince editors to you opinion, you should start discussion on the talk page. You won't convince people if you keep reverting edits - and such action can only end with a ban for you. Szturnek_¿? 19:45, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, The first thing I do was to use talk page, if you look there you would see. I already convinced one of the participants https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2025_Polish_presidential_election&oldid=1279967027. "Have it your way" let's keep it to the facts (not speculations, opinions, predictions, fillings) the facts that are here: https://wybory.gov.pl/prezydent2025/en/kandydaci Bildete (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Afghan emigrants to Portugal has been nominated for splitting

Category:Afghan emigrants to Portugal has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 03:54, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Moroccan mass murderers has been nominated for splitting

Category:Moroccan mass murderers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 03:56, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hi there. I saw your nomination for deletion at Katarzyna Cichos. You haven’t created a deletion discussion so I have removed it. If you would like to create a deletion discussion and renominate it, then that’s fine. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 13:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Amsterdam stabbing attack, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Belgian, Polish and American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 presidential candidates

Hi, you have recently added mentions to the lead section of candidates for the 2025 Polish presidential election about their candidacy. I understand that this is a practice at the Polish Wikipedia, however in my opinion these mentions can be contrary with the English Wikipedia policy of what is noteworthy to put in the lead section of a biography in regards to most recent events, see MOS:LEADBIO. Please note that the information about person standing in the election, becomes dated right after the election is over and has to be removed, as its not a major activity of the person (this is with exceptions, when the person became notable for standing for a specific election or repeatedly runs for an office, e.g. Szymon Hołownia who became notable in Polish politics when running for the office in 2020, or Rafał Trzaskowski who advanced to second round). Therefore I opt for removing these mentions from lead sections of Zandberg, Senyszyn or Biejat. — Antoni12345 (talk) 13:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bildete reported by User:XYZ1233212 (Result: ). Thank you. XYZ1233212 (talk) 11:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ivan Litvinchuk

Hello, Bildete,

Thank you for creating Ivan Litvinchuk.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Subject of article seems notable. More details are needed on fact " a war criminal" which is mentioned in lead. Article says he was imprisoned, but can more words be added that describe which sources conclude " a war criminal"? What words do the sources use? Which sources?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Portal:Current events/2025 May 22. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Floyd. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 19:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Please also read the talk header section of pages in this topic area for possible additional information and editing restrictions. It does not appear that this notice has been posted to your talk page. If it has already been left already by another editor, please let me know. If you have questions, please request help at the Teahouse.  // Timothy :: talk  00:54, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Problem editing on articles related to Poland and Ukraine

I have left a Contentious topics warning above. From this point on you will be expected to understand the special restrictions when editing topics related to Eastern Europe.

Re: Your inappropriate changes, slow moving edit war, and personal attacks on other editors.

On June 3 you made this change: [1], which was reverted. You made the same change on June 16 [2], which again was reverted, then you again made the same change on June 22 [3]. This is clearly a slow moving edit war and it needs to stop. Two other editors in addition to myself object to your changes. Before continuing editing you are strongly advised to read Wikipedia:Edit warring and the special restrictions related to topics in Eastern Europe I placed above. Before making this change again, you need to gain WP:CONSENSUS for the change on the article talk page.

Regarding the source you use [4], this is a political statement on a government website; Wikipedia requires neutral independent reliable sources. Before you continue editing please read WP:RS. Questions about this can be answered at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.

I have also noticed you changed "massacre" to "genocide" in the template at [5]. The name of the article is clearly Massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia; the article discusses the claim that this constitutes genocide, but this is not the consensus of historians (outside of Poland). After being reverted you repeated this again at [6]. There is a significant difference between "massacre" to "genocide"; if you wish to make this significant change you will need to show there is a consensus of neutral independent reliable sources and a consensus of Wikipedia editors to make this change.

Finally also accuse another editor of being a sockpuppet in your edit summary at [7] and accuse other editors of genocide denial [8], [9]. If you accuse any other editor of genocide denial, you will need very good evidence and be prepared to defend your comments at WP:ANI.

Again please read: WP:EW, WP:CONSENSUS, WP:RS, WP:NPOV and the special restrictions mentioned in the notice I placed above; if you have questions, post either to WP:TEAHOUSE or the appropriate notice board. Given your history of problematic editing (see User talk:Bildete), I would strongly suggest you read and follow these guidelines. After reviewing your edit history, I believe you should be blocked from editing articles related to Poland, Ukraine and genocide. In the event this problem continues this will be discussed at WP:ANI and you may be blocked from editing, either entirely or from the topics I mentioned.

 // Timothy :: talk  00:54, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rudnitsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rudnica.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Świniarski

Hello Bildete,

I'm Significa liberdade, and I patrol new pages here on Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged a page that you created (Świniarski) for deletion because it is an unnecessary disambiguation page per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:07, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

intitle

Template:intitle does not distinguish diacritics. Therefore

• All pages with titles containing Pienkowski
• All pages with titles containing Pieńkowski

redundant, it is enough to add

• All pages with titles containing Pienkowski

--Altenmann >talk 09:42, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

plural: Świniarscy

This is English-language Wikipedia. Do not put "plural: ...scy" for Polish surnames, because in English plural is Świniarskis. --Altenmann >talk 09:46, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Ukrainian nobility of Galicia, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name does not follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Moves of this page have been flagged as a potentially controversial move, therefore if you wish the title to be changed you need to start a formal discussion through WP:RM. Thanks.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I did this. Please !vote there. --Altenmann >talk 19:35, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Piotr Szczerek

The article Piotr Szczerek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Do we really want an encyclopedia article about a stupid tennis fan? This guy's only claim to fame and inclusion was taking a hat from a boy in the crowd. Is that encyclopedic? Sounds more like tabloid fodder. 5 years from now this article will be ridiculous.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]