User talk:Bildete

Welcome

Hello Bildete and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Jewish pogroms in Amsterdam, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:04, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Bildete, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:05, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivan Mazepa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruthenian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for ensuring that some articles look like shit and are impossible to read

Unfortunately, our disagreement is not limited to the ethnic attribution of some historical figures. By undoing my edit You successfully deleted a lot of information added by me to an article, which I am not going to restore for a second time, because I suspect by now that your aim is to keep the quality of Wikipedia articles related to a particular topic artificially low, so that eventually most of their content will be deleted. It is useless to edit an article if one's edits will be deleted anyway.

Nazi concentration camps

Please see Talk:Identification of inmates in Nazi concentration camps --Altenmann >talk 20:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

I see from Portal talk:Current events/2025 February 27 that you've apparently given up on adding this holiday to the Current Events page. That's good, because you've already broken the three revert rule a couple times over, so it's already within my discretion to block you from editing. I'm not doing that at this time.

Also, vandalism has a specific meaning on Wikipedia, and "an unregistered user changed something I edited" does not fall into it. (Especially when they're right.) Calling non-vandalism edits "vandalism" is a personal attack, which is also blockable, so please, cut it out. —Cryptic 10:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bildete. Thank you for your work on Judaszki. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

this phrase isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:38, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bildete. Thank you for your work on Zbrodnie w Leonówce. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

"Zbrodnie" isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smorzhiv, Lviv Oblast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radziechów.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Witam
Please stop reverting edits on page 2025 Polish presidential election!
Nobody agree with you, but if you want to convince editors to you opinion, you should start discussion on the talk page. You won't convince people if you keep reverting edits - and such action can only end with a ban for you. Szturnek_¿? 19:45, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, The first thing I do was to use talk page, if you look there you would see. I already convinced one of the participants https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2025_Polish_presidential_election&oldid=1279967027. "Have it your way" let's keep it to the facts (not speculations, opinions, predictions, fillings) the facts that are here: https://wybory.gov.pl/prezydent2025/en/kandydaci Bildete (talk) 19:57, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Afghan emigrants to Portugal has been nominated for splitting

Category:Afghan emigrants to Portugal has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 03:54, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Moroccan mass murderers has been nominated for splitting

Category:Moroccan mass murderers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 03:56, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hi there. I saw your nomination for deletion at Katarzyna Cichos. You haven’t created a deletion discussion so I have removed it. If you would like to create a deletion discussion and renominate it, then that’s fine. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 13:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2025 Amsterdam stabbing attack, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Belgian, Polish and American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 presidential candidates

Hi, you have recently added mentions to the lead section of candidates for the 2025 Polish presidential election about their candidacy. I understand that this is a practice at the Polish Wikipedia, however in my opinion these mentions can be contrary with the English Wikipedia policy of what is noteworthy to put in the lead section of a biography in regards to most recent events, see MOS:LEADBIO. Please note that the information about person standing in the election, becomes dated right after the election is over and has to be removed, as its not a major activity of the person (this is with exceptions, when the person became notable for standing for a specific election or repeatedly runs for an office, e.g. Szymon Hołownia who became notable in Polish politics when running for the office in 2020, or Rafał Trzaskowski who advanced to second round). Therefore I opt for removing these mentions from lead sections of Zandberg, Senyszyn or Biejat. — Antoni12345 (talk) 13:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bildete reported by User:XYZ1233212 (Result: ). Thank you. XYZ1233212 (talk) 11:21, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ivan Litvinchuk

Hello, Bildete,

Thank you for creating Ivan Litvinchuk.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Subject of article seems notable. More details are needed on fact " a war criminal" which is mentioned in lead. Article says he was imprisoned, but can more words be added that describe which sources conclude " a war criminal"? What words do the sources use? Which sources?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noleander}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noleander (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Portal:Current events/2025 May 22. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]