User talk:TylerBurden
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
You removed perfectly goo author attributions from multiple citations in that sloppy revert. Regardless of the merit of reverting the other content, you are not entitled to deprive hardworking journalists of their rightful credit in citations to their work in the course of doing so. Do not do this again. I work very hard to track down cases of missing author attribution to correct it and your sloppy reverts ruin it. See Wikipedia:Reverting. My edit of just crediting authors of newspaper articles cited was completely harmless and something that should not have been undone just because a different editor made a bad edit. Please self-correct it ASAP, and do not do this again.--CitationAuditor (talk) 22:33, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- I would say equating accidentally reverting edits you made with committing plagiarism is maybe an overreaction, your passion is clear, but that's not a reason not to WP:AGF. I thought (incorrectly) your edits were concerning the recently made edits, that being said I apologize that your work was removed, and I restored it to the article. TylerBurden (talk) 19:21, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
So Khamzat Chimaev was never Swedish. And your attempt to lie about it has been exposed. It’s now clear that he is Russian and more recently Arab. Whould you care to comment on your years long dishonesty? 2A00:801:4AF:EE1A:F056:B0F8:2784:9C01 (talk) 23:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you're talking about, haven't edited the page in years, but thanks for the chuckle. TylerBurden (talk) 19:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
I think it would be more convenient for the link List of Snipers to be located in the intro, where deadliest sniper is mentioned and readers need to make the comparison. ΕυστάθιοςΧ (talk) 13:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Eh still goes into too much WP:EASTEREGG for me, it's a general list of notable snipers, with no particular fixation on "deadliness" other than a confirmed kills being listed. I think the location is fine. TylerBurden (talk) 19:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.
Technical news
- A new feature called Multiblocks will be deployed on English Wikipedia on the week of June 2. See the relevant announcement on the administrators' noticeboard.
- History merges performed using the mergehistory special page are now logged at both the source and destination, rather than just the source as previously, after this RFC and the resolution of T118132.
Arbitration
- An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.
Miscellaneous
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 17 June 2025. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
- An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
- The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in June 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Supporting you position on NON-INCLUSION of Russian propaganda about war crimes, let me just remind you that you shouldn't respond to @IP editing the talk page as it falls under clearly against CT as WP:RUSUKR clearly does. I know, because I was banned for two weeks. Thank you 78.81.123.235 (talk) 11:47, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- IP's can take part in discussions even on CT topics with some restrictions, one of the requirements being that their contributions are constructive, which I wouldn't say that particular IP was. Unfortunately people feed the trolls instead of reverting obvious bs, but that's the state of that article. TylerBurden (talk) 20:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)