User talk:Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surbhi Shukla (October 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NACTOR) but presently it is not clear that it does.

As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that many of the references are not from sources that are considered reliable for establishing notability and should be removed (including blogs, company websites, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Spotify etc). Additionally, the draft is not of a standard appropriate for an encyclopedia. The draft does not appear to show that the subject has any notability beyond the average coverage for similar non-notable actors (see WP:ROTM). Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NACTOR criteria #3, because XXXXX").

Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 09:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 09:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Saad Bilgrami

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Saad Bilgrami, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:51, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Surbhi Shukla, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:04, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm JalenBarks. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Surbhi Shukla. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Barks (Woof) 15:45, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Aydoh8. I noticed that you recently removed content from Surbhi Shukla without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Aydoh8[contribs] 04:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr. Raghu D for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Raghu D is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Raghu D until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Junbeesh (talk) 07:38, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Surbhi Shukla

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Surbhi Shukla, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:10, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@FireflyBot first of all my page is redirect. please remove my page in redirect page Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12 (talk) 11:54, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vishal Yadav (actor)

[edit]

Your article has been moved to draft space for a number of reasons. It is not ready for mainspace. Please work on it there before submitting for an independent review. Please don't try to move it yourself. Deb (talk) 14:25, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23, Deb, and Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12: AKR12, I think you may have some explaining to do.
The text of the 1 Jul 2024 WP:A7 and WP:G11 deleted article Vishal Yadav (actor) started off with this text:
{{Infobox person
| name = Vishal Yadav (actor)
| birth_date = 1997/03/15
| birth_place = Arrah, Bihar, India
| education = MA in Political Science
University: Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, Bihar
| occupation = Actor
| years_active = 2014
| known_for = Panchayat 3
|Dream Girl 2
|Bharat Nagar Diaries
| mother = Sumanti Devi
| father = Sri Mahavir Singh Yadav
}}


The text of Draft:Vishal Yadav (actor) starts off with this text:
{{Infobox person
| name = Vishal Yadav
| birth_date = 1997/03/15
| citizenship = Indian
| education = Master's Degree in Political Science
| occupation = Indian Actor
| years_active = 2015
| known_for = Panchayat 3, Dream Girl 2, Bharat Nagar Diaries
| mother = Sumanti Devi
| father = Mahavir Singh Yadav
}}
I am positively obligated to assume good faith about this but I do think an explanation on your part may well be appropriate here.
So: your respose to this is... ?
--Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I moved it to draft because it was so badly written and didn't meet the criteria. How's that? Deb (talk) 11:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In looking back at it, it looks like I should have deleted it as an a7 only, not a g11.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Saad Bilgrami

[edit]

The same goes for this draft. Deb (talk) 14:33, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Joe-img.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Joe-img.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Surbhi Shukla

[edit]

Hello, Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Surbhi Shukla".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:25, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

[edit]

Hello, Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Mukul Chadda seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Calmkelp talk 11:32, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vishal Yadav (actor)

[edit]
Notice

The article Vishal Yadav (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG, nor does he meet WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 12:09, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr. Raghu D for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr. Raghu D is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Raghu D (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:20, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Mr. Raghu D, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Raghu D suggests that you might be a paid editor. Please disclose. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:25, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:41, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kumar Saurabh Wikipedia is purely promotional

[edit]

Hi, Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12. Your edit such as the one you made to Kumar Saurabh is too promotion type edit, gives impression that seems you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting the actor, but you have not considered with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Your activity in wikipedia feels not good. DivitNation (talk) 08:34, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kumar Saurabh for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kumar Saurabh, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumar Saurabh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:33, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12 (talk) 12:02, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Deletion
I oppose the deletion of the article Kumar Saurabh. The subject clearly meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for actors, as there is significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources.
Evidence of Notability:
1. Mainstream Media Coverage
Times of India and The Tribune have reported about Kumar Saurabh’s roles in web series and films.
Zee News covered his casting in Maharani 2.
Outlook India featured him in an exclusive about Guns & Gulaabs.
2. Verified Biographies
StarsUnfolded has a detailed profile on his life, education, and acting career: StarsUnfolded – Kumar Saurabh
3. Filmography & OTT Presence
He has acted in notable films (Laal Rang, Baaghi 2, Shamshera, Mumbaikar, UT 69) and popular web series (Maharani 2, Guns & Gulaabs, High, Maamla Legal Hai, Tribhuvan Mishra CA Topper). This consistent work in mainstream cinema and streaming platforms establishes his professional significance.
4. Verifiability & Neutrality
The article is based on published, independent sources.
It is written in a neutral, encyclopedic tone.
I am not connected with any paid promotion; my only intention is to ensure that a notable actor is represented accurately.
Conclusion
Instead of deletion, the article should be improved with additional citations. There is ample reliable coverage that demonstrates Kumar Saurabh’s notability as per Wikipedia’s policies. Deleting the page would remove verifiable encyclopedic content. Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12 (talk) 12:13, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ali Khan (Indian actor)

[edit]

Hello, Ajay Kumar Rastogi 12,

Thank you for creating Ali Khan (Indian actor).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Times of India and IMDB are not a reliable source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Fade258}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Fade258 (talk) 15:08, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Khan (Indian actor) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Ali Khan (Indian actor). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 20:17, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali Khan (Indian actor) (October 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 12:19, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]