User talk:YameenØriøn

April 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Parazoa have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Parazoa was changed by YameenØriøn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866664 on 2025-04-25T09:17:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. As tempting as it may be, please don't talk negatively about other editors. See WP:CIV. Nahida 🌷 14:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but a some particular editors like- 2001:1308:2695:7300:28f9:8297:d35a:7cf8 and sometimes VastSugarPaleo directly vandalises pages YameenØriøn (talk) 14:18, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand vandalism is annoying, but it's still required for any and all editors to remain civil on Wikipedia. It is a core policy. Nahida 🌷 14:20, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cnidaria, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donald Albury 20:25, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thnx for the info.

I didn't have enough time for searching a source but I thought I would give the references today.

I have experienced editing before.(A year ago) YameenØriøn (talk) 06:52, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hi YameenØriøn! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 10:09, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if ur talking about the edit on animalia then, in my opinion it actually doesn't change the meaning that much just elaborates and further divides the taxons making the concepts and classification s clear but if the definition doesn't fit right then I won't use the term any more thanks.

Thnaks for notifying as it can help me in future edits. YameenØriøn (talk) 12:18, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate parameter errors in Template:Taxonomy/Incertae sedis/Eukaryota

Your edits to Template:Taxonomy/Incertae sedis/Eukaryota are generating multiple errors because there are 2 parent parameters. You probably don't see the errors because you're editing with a mobile phone, but this template is so simple that it's easy to see there are 2 parent parms.

In general, it's forbidden to have more than one parm with the same name ("parent" in this case) in a template call ("Don't edit this line" in this case).

An error in a template causes the error also to occur in articles that transclude it. You can see them in Category:Articles using duplicate arguments in template calls.

BTW, when displaying an article in mobile mode, you can switch to the desktop mode by pressing the "Desktop" button at the bottom. Then pressing "Show preview" when editing will display errors. But of course it's awkward on a small screen.

Please fix the duplicate parent problem in the template. Davemck (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying. YameenØriøn (talk) 03:08, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chordate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Appendicularia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for notifying me YameenØriøn (talk) 10:40, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cladogram on user page

To eliminate any possibility that the cladogram on your user page may be seen as a violation of the guideline at Wikipedia:User pages, I suggest that you move that cladogram to a sub-page, such as User:YameenØriøn/Bacteria. It is generally a good idea to keep article drafts and other projects under development off of your user page, either in Draft space or in a sub-page under your user page. Templates such as {{user page}}, {{user page bar}}, or {{user sandbox}} as well as a note on the intended use of the contnent on the sub-page will make it clear that the sub-page contains content you are working on for eventual use in Wikipedia. Donald Albury 16:54, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks YameenØriøn (talk) 12:51, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Trilobozoa source on Eumetazoa

...Hang on, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030117060041 doesn't lead to an article by Ivantsov, and I cannot see any article by him listed for issue 51(6). Where did these details for the source for Trilobozoa you added come from? Monster Iestyn (talk) 17:55, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sry I'm just dumb,I mistakenly mentioned it.I meant to give the ref to another pageYameenØriøn (talk) 18:36, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I might have made a mistake

I mistakenly mentioned it.I meant to give the ref to another page of ivantsov YameenØriøn (talk) 18:36, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eumetazoa missing references

On the page for Eumetazoa <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eumetazoa>, do you happen to have citations for the following two statements? (I am aware that you might not have contributed these sentences in the first place.):

"When treated as a formal taxon Eumetazoa is typically ranked as a subkingdom."

"The name Metazoa has also been used to refer to this group [by whom?], but more often refers to the Animalia as a whole." FloatingDeadzone (talk) 19:12, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I may be able to let's see YameenØriøn (talk) 04:45, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The latter is wrong and whoever wrote that, God knows what's on his mind.I have removed the part from the wikipage. YameenØriøn (talk) 12:46, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok

I may be able to let's see.

August 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Diaphoretickes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. I'm talking about this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diaphoretickes&diff=prev&oldid=1290835261 of yours. I know it's been a long time since, I should've warned you earlier, my bad. Jako96 (talk) 16:00, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I don't understand what your saying.Did I cite anything.Its been a long time.Btw I'm a new editor so yeah, I've yet to know many things.If there was any mistakes I'm very sorry. YameenØriøn (talk) 16:24, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How you don't understand? The problem is, you didn't cite anything. When you add or change content in Wikipedia, you should cite a reliable source. Jako96 (talk) 17:53, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Always? I mean well I do a lot of taxonomy edits, normally they are based on general current consensus. If that's a strict rule that should always be followed, I will from now on.I am usually busy with other stuff (projects) so time is a big factor for me . There are some stuff that I learned years or months back. So, I put those in articles those without any citations(or ask for em) as it will take a lot of time. YameenØriøn (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Normally, yes, you SHOULD always cite a source. It is one of the most strict and important rules of Wikipedia. And, could you tell me which articles are these? If you remember? These edits can be reverted. I recently reverted this edit of yours. Lastly, thanks for understanding. Jako96 (talk) 22:46, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

k..it's been a long time I don't remember,plus it will take a lot of time to search for em ,so yeah from now on I will never forget to cite even if it takes time. YameenØriøn (talk) 08:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thank you! Jako96 (talk) 09:27, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Hello, I'm Criticize. I noticed that in this edit to Chondrichthyes, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Criticize (talk) 14:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying, I explained it better in the new removal check it out.

Well newer studies suggest that the removed genus was (possibly ?) a shark.So I removed it. YameenØriøn (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lomosovis, you may be blocked from editing. Lomosovis is not a definite animal, but just an organism, that's only known. Jako96 (talk) 10:37, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely an eukaryote right.

Btw can u give me the source you collected the info from. Then I can cite.I put the info u gave me.YameenØriøn (talk) 10:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It being a eukaryote is not for sure. Also, I did give you the links in my talk page, let me give you again: https://doi.org/10.15421/111835, https://www.academia.edu/12946537/Upper_Vendian_macrofossils_of_Eastern_Europe_Middle_Dniester_area_and_Volhynia and https://doi.org/10.30836/igs.2522-9753.268218. Jako96 (talk) 15:51, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks G YameenØriøn (talk) 17:05, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Stem group kingdoms. I'm sorry but I have to give you this warning. Jako96 (talk) 10:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Btw for how long am I gonna be blocked if I use poorly sourced info? YameenØriøn (talk) 15:56, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Probably not for much long. Like 31 to 72 hours or something, I believe. Jako96 (talk) 18:14, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will not make such unsourced edits again.From now on that's gonna be my oath.

The time is prolly gonna be doubled when done twice in a row. YameenØriøn (talk) 18:24, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy that you understood me. Jako96 (talk) 18:35, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

👍 YameenØriøn (talk) 07:10, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft moved: Flavostratum

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Flavostratum. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 16:30, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. YameenØriøn (talk) 17:35, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flavostratum incrustatum (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You’ve made a good start on this article, but, unfortunately as yet it lacks sufficient sources which prove notability. It requires 2-3 sources which are reliable, independent, secondary sources, which talk at length about the topic of the article. Unfortunately the sources you have so far don’t do this. The fifth citation gives a “do you want to buy this domain” link, and the others have, at best, a passing mention of Flavostratum incrustatum whole talking about other topics (The Paleontological Journal article doesn’t even have that). Until we have more sources proving notability, it will not be possible to approve this article. Good luck and keep up the hard work 👍

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flavostratum incrustatum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Absurdum4242 (talk) 15:11, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Copied from my talk page Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flavostratum (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Commandant Quacks-a-lot was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Flavostratum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, YameenØriøn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate the hlp.I may ask others and learn a thing or two at the teahouse. YameenØriøn (talk) 09:38, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]