User talk:Vrxces

  1. Home
  2. Wiki
icon
Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metal Fatigue (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold master.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Coming Out Simulator 2014 has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Coming Out Simulator 2014 has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tarlby -- Tarlby (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Age of Empires II: The Conquerors

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Age of Empires II: The Conquerors, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:22, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Age of Empires II: The Conquerors. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Encodya, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.  Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:22, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - all fixed and back in mainspace with complete sections. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:39, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Return to Castle Wolfenstein

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Vrxces. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Return to Castle Wolfenstein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Metal Fatigue (video game)
added links pointing to D3D and Deathmatch
Age of Empires II: The Conquerors
added a link pointing to Gold master

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ultima: Runes of Virtue II

[edit]

Hello, Vrxces. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ultima: Runes of Virtue II".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:59, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

blippo plus web question

[edit]

does playdate season 2 bundle reviews count as a blippo plus review? Tpurcell736 (talk) 20:40, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

101 Dalmatians: Escape From DeVil Manor

[edit]

Hi! :) I've been collecting sources for 101 Dalmatians: Escape From DeVil Manor (a page you nominated for deletion before) since it was redirected.

Are these sources enough for an article? If not I will keep looking.

Timur9008 (talk) 08:08, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! The standard we're looking for is for around three sources to: (1) be a reliable secondary source with (2) significant coverage about the subject, that is, discussing the game in-depth. Numbering your sources from [1] to [8]:
[1] ☒N PC Data sales charts are a helpful source, but not for notability: there's no coverage about the game in detail.
[2] ☒N This is a primary source which doesn't discuss the game very much and primary sources aren't helpful for notability.
[3] checkY Allgame is an excellent reliable review source and the review discusses everything in depth. Great stuff. Don't forget that the Overview page is separate to the Review page, and both usually have useful information.
[4] exclamation mark  This is borderline, Salt Lake Tribune is a syndicated newspaper and it does discuss and praise the game; but only in a few sentences, and the article is pre-release and not really what you could call a review.
[5] exclamation mark  I am surprised! Kids Domain is an affiliate project of Games Domain and Cynthia is on their editorial staff as shown here: [1]. So it's actually perfectly reliable. The issue is there isn't much of a review here: it looks like Cynthia repeats the press release information about the game, and briefly mentions her kids had fun but some puzzles were hard. One to include but unsure if this is a strong anchor for notability.
[6] ☒N The NYT are obviously reliable, but the only brief mention is just repeating the sales charts. No actual coverage and doesn't tell us anything new compared to [1], although worth including to corroborate.
[7] ☒N Worth including for the release date and fact it was showcased at E3, but is just a trivial mention.
[8] ☒N Worth including to note the VA for Cruella also did this game, but again, is just a trivial mention.
So almost there. Opinions differ on whether [3]-[5] would satisfy WP:THREE, I'd personally say almost but not quite, on the basis that only Allgame comfortably provides depth on the game, although the other two are close but just don't have enough to say. Have you checked the Internet Archive? ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:05, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I will keep looking then. It's possible there are more reviews and sources out there.
RE Internet Archive: I've indeed checked the Internet Archive but I found nothing there. Timur9008 (talk) 09:22, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are absolutely on the right track and apologies if this was a bit discouraging. What you are doing is good - finding the sources to scope out notability before going all in. If, even without three reviews, looking at the totality of the sources you've found, you think you can defensibly say there's enough coverage to describe the game and its reception, you could always have a crack at a draft and see how another editor feels. I am probably on the more conservative side of what's notable compared to other editors. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:34, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Terminator: Future Shock

[edit]

Hi! :) You previously helped me expand Gridiron!. Was wondering can you help expand The Terminator: Future Shock? If possible. Timur9008 (talk) 12:07, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Luxuria Superbia is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Luxuria Superbia is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dentsinhere43 -- Dentsinhere43 (talk) 10:08, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited XSN Sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Top Spin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft feedback

[edit]

You may be interested in this [2]. Vacosea (talk) 22:42, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Return to Castle Wolfenstein

[edit]

Hello, Vrxces. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Return to Castle Wolfenstein".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Horrid Henry characters

[edit]

Hi. I added secondary references to the books Humor in Contemporary Junior Literature (2010), Onomastics in Contemporary Public Space (2013), What Is a Short Story? (2015) and Happy Holidays - Animated!: A Worldwide Encyclopedia of Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa and New Year's Cartoons on Television and Film (2019) (reference now removed). Out of the four, Bobby Cohn said that Humor in Contemporary Junior Literature and Onomastics in Contemporary Public Space "look much more promising as secondary sources and look like they conduct some critical analysis". I also found The Publishers Weekly's review of Horrid Henry (2009) and A Guide for Children's Literature Teachers and Students (2025), but I am not sure if either of them is a third strong secondary source covering the characters (individually or in a class) though, and I have just removed most of the descriptions of plots from the books and TV series. I am not sure if List of Horrid Henry characters will ever have an article. If so, would I have to add a "notability/more citations needed" template at the top of the article? Bladerunner09 (talk) 11:28, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:My Talking Tom 2

[edit]

I quite understand. I've been wasting my time, mainly because all information is original research, true, but no reliable sources to support it. As a gamer, I probably have a bunch of articles waiting to be created related to video games, so I may really need your help. If you can maybe decide to help, you can always check out My page list, not that I'm forcing you or anything. Stay safe. ⟨⟨BeastBoy-X-Talk!⟩⟩ 03:58, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey mate, sorry for the bad news. More than happy to take a look this afternoon and see what sort of sources I can find for your WIP pages. But yeah, it can be a bit annoying to find the coverage isnt quite there for cool games. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:08, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah ⟨⟨BeastBoy-X-Talk!⟩⟩ 04:12, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bro, the game "Godbreakers" is going to be released on 23 October 2025 04:00 PM, so when I write the article, should I use Past tense or Future tense? ⟨⟨BeastBoy-X-Talk!⟩⟩ 04:31, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like Godbreakers has a little bit of pre-release coverage that isn't just press releases like those captured in Gematsu [3] like this Kotaku [4] and RPGamer article [5], a few ones just riffing on the announcement [6][7] and IGN has all the trailer information [8]. Basically, if you were to put all this together and the draft were accepted before release, you'd say it's an upcoming game in future tense. Be aware that some editors think without a lot of coverage, it can be WP:TOOSOON to release articles on games that haven't had a commercial release if they lack a lot of coverage beyond reactions to the press release put out by the developer. Not bad - looks like this will get some reviews once it's released too. It could be a good candidate to work on. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see, I think I'll write it in Past Tense, that will give me enough time to work on it, and I'll submit it on 23 October 2025 04:01, just one minute after it's release 😁 ⟨⟨BeastBoy-X-Talk!⟩⟩ 15:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey mate, how's My Talking Tom 2 looking? Good or worse? Don't be afraid to tell me terrible news 😁 I can WP:TNT and start a stub if possible 🙂 ⟨⟨BeastBoy-X-Talk!⟩⟩ 03:57, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, CafeBazaar and Appwereld are user reviews from people who downloaded the app. The reception really needs some sort of significant commentary from a reliable secondary source about the content of the game itself. What do you think the strongest sources are at the moment in the article? ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:50, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The "Reception" section needs some improvement I'm aware of that but first of all, after trying some search engines for the reception part I found a lot of info as you can see in [9] but removed it because it was from unreliable sources, mostly from Common Sense Media and Wikia (Fandom) others really don't even mention MTT2 some about MTT not even reviews on metacritic [10], so the reception section might need........ I don't know. Anyway, I think pocketgamer.biz/com (5) holds the article what do you think? ⟨⟨BeastBoy-X-Talk!⟩⟩ 08:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What can I do? Submit it for speedy deletion? Blank it? Leave it like that? Coz it's not ready to enter the mainspace, or just remove parts without references? To tell you the truth, I don't know which references are reliable, really need your help here ⟨⟨BeastBoy-X-Talk!⟩⟩ 01:59, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You don't have to delete the draft at all - it can sit there untouched for about six months. Currently, the only sources that are reliable and in-depth are the PG sources, and it may be that there are just not enough sources to make the article notable. Or maybe they are out there and the draft can sit there whilst those are found. On a source analysis, happy to chat about which sources are and aren't hitting the mark. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but you might want to check out Draft:My Talking Angela. MTT2 is a bit tricky, I'm currently aiming on making Godbreakers a Good Article so, MTT2 's gotta wait for a minute or two (or weeks/months in this case). Any way, MTT2 still needs some reliable sources, coz it can't hit the mainspace with PG pulli'n it, so let's jump on to GB (Godbreakers) or MTA (My Talking Angela) what do you think? ⟨⟨BeastBoy-X-Talk!⟩⟩ 03:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please add sections to GB ⟨⟨BeastBoy-X-Talk!⟩⟩ 03:22, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My role here is to help editors with AFC get across the line with finding sources to satisfy WP:GNG, I don't really edit people's drafts for them, but can point you in the direction of the manual of style if you're looking for guidance on sections. If you're referring to Draft:Godbreakers, I think I see the issue here. There are no citations - you really do need to find the reliable sources first and draft the article around those sources, rather than drafting something and then retrofitting the article with sources to make it notable. I hope that makes sense. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It makes sense.
Anyway, Please review Draft:My Talking Angela ⟨⟨BeastBoy-X-Talk!⟩⟩ 22:44, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Luxuria Superbia has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Luxuria Superbia has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dentsinhere43 -- Dentsinhere43 (talk) 00:12, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Metal Fatigue (video game) is on hold

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Metal Fatigue (video game) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 19:26, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reviews

[edit]

Hi VRXCES! I hope you're doing well. Hey, i don't know how interest are you in doing a GA review right now but since you reviewed a few Atari Jaguar-related articles in the past, i just recently nominated Supercross 3D as a potential GA. Let me know if you're interested in that one. Take care and happy week! Roberth Martinez (talk) 23:07, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be keen! I can take it on, but may take a little time to review - weekend at the earliest. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 23:13, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Jenny of the Prairie is on hold

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Jenny of the Prairie has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 14:41, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Jenny of the Prairie has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Jenny of the Prairie has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 21:06, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Metal Fatigue (video game) has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Metal Fatigue (video game) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Jenny of the Prairie

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Jenny of the Prairie at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bridget (talk) 15:16, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metal Fatigue (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:33, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Barbie (1984 video game) has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Barbie (1984 video game) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 14:26, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Öoo

[edit]

Thanks for doing this page. I was going to do it (after I did the ElecHead page), but to be honest, I wasn't exactly sure if the sources were significant enough to warrant a page yet. I'm glad someone ended up doing it regardless. Yellowmarkers (talk) 16:39, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries and very welcome! Some indie games tend not to have formal reviews but the coverage from reliable sources are evaluative and deep enough to clearly pass the mark as here. Great work on Elechead. I am about halfway through playing the game too! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 20:56, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]