User talk:Vrxces

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Follow-up on Crypto: The Game draft

[edit]

Hi @Vrxces,

Thanks for your earlier review of the Crypto: The Game draft. I’ve made several updates based on the feedback, including removing source duplication (that was a mistake), tightening language, and ensuring each sentence now includes a citation. The article now cites 8 distinct, independent secondary sources, including Wired, Fortune, Axios, Variety (x2), GoldDerby, Decrypt (x2), and a Television Academy feature.

Would appreciate it if you could take another look. Thanks again! HotPotato26 (talk) 14:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Playgama

[edit]

Hello.

Thank you for your comments on my article.

I have added additional secondary sources to it. However, I would like to clarify what you wrote about the reasons for its interest. It seems to me that it is also interesting as a source of expertise - its market reviews are cited by independent secondary sources and as an Open Source SDK developer about which game development professionals write quite a lot.

But in order not to make separate articles about the company and its main product, I combined them together. Do you think this is right?

If it is not difficult for you, I ask you to see whether the article is now suitable for publication in the main space.

Best regards

Paraplon (talk) 12:08, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Coming Out Simulator

[edit]

Hello Vrxces. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Coming Out Simulator, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Page title is a plausible redirect, or it does not substantially duplicate the other topic. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:45, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ultima: Runes of Virtue II

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Vrxces. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ultima: Runes of Virtue II, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Coming Out Simulator 2014 is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Coming Out Simulator 2014 is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tarlby -- Tarlby (talk) 22:06, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

[edit]

FYI, I may or may not have time to continue the review 'till the weekend. Sorry about that.

Cheers. Tarlby (t) (c) 01:22, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No rush! Appreciate your help. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:05, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ: Your Prejudicial Deletion of a Well Written Article with 15 Good References

[edit]

This is a rushed and discriminatory rejection of a well drafted article. There is a five week waiting period for new article submissions, yet a couple of Wikipedia editors have taken it upon themselves to rush this submission to the very top the heap and destroy it instantly. There are several points of noteworthiness about this game, and 15 references. You can't just throw away 15 solid references with a couple of over generalized and arbitrarily enforced statements. You are grossly minimizing the quality of many of the references which each are relevant in the article information that they support. This is a robust and well written article drafted within the rules. Further, University Case Studies of which there was only one are not to be disrespected and minimized by you. Being the first published video game to use Gimp for the artwork is notable enough in itself to allow this article to remain. It's a well documented fact that has never been challenged in 10 years and is well supported by experts around the world. This decision is simply discrimination by higher ranking Wikipedia editors who have the power to arbitrarily dismiss with prejudice the history and work they choose. I will not be using this disgraceful "encyclopedia" again. Erasing history is not acceptable. Playthebeat (talk) 22:38, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear you feel hurt. The article was rejected, and not deleted. You are welcome to resubmit it at any point and have another editor review. Please assume good faith when other editors are providing feedback on why your draft may not meet the standards of the site. I am happy to help you look for reliable sources. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 22:40, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Altered Beast: Guardian of the Realms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Revenge of Shinobi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:31, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metal Fatigue (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold master.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Coming Out Simulator 2014 has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Coming Out Simulator 2014 has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tarlby -- Tarlby (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Age of Empires II: The Conquerors

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Age of Empires II: The Conquerors, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:22, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Age of Empires II: The Conquerors. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:46, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Encodya, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.  Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:22, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - all fixed and back in mainspace with complete sections. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:39, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Return to Castle Wolfenstein

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Vrxces. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Return to Castle Wolfenstein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Metal Fatigue (video game)
added links pointing to D3D and Deathmatch
Age of Empires II: The Conquerors
added a link pointing to Gold master

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ultima: Runes of Virtue II

[edit]

Hello, Vrxces. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ultima: Runes of Virtue II".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:59, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

blippo plus web question

[edit]

does playdate season 2 bundle reviews count as a blippo plus review? Tpurcell736 (talk) 20:40, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

101 Dalmatians: Escape From DeVil Manor

[edit]

Hi! :) I've been collecting sources for 101 Dalmatians: Escape From DeVil Manor (a page you nominated for deletion before) since it was redirected.

Are these sources enough for an article? If not I will keep looking.

Timur9008 (talk) 08:08, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! The standard we're looking for is for around three sources to: (1) be a reliable secondary source with (2) significant coverage about the subject, that is, discussing the game in-depth. Numbering your sources from [1] to [8]:
[1] ☒N PC Data sales charts are a helpful source, but not for notability: there's no coverage about the game in detail.
[2] ☒N This is a primary source which doesn't discuss the game very much and primary sources aren't helpful for notability.
[3] checkY Allgame is an excellent reliable review source and the review discusses everything in depth. Great stuff. Don't forget that the Overview page is separate to the Review page, and both usually have useful information.
[4] exclamation mark  This is borderline, Salt Lake Tribune is a syndicated newspaper and it does discuss and praise the game; but only in a few sentences, and the article is pre-release and not really what you could call a review.
[5] exclamation mark  I am surprised! Kids Domain is an affiliate project of Games Domain and Cynthia is on their editorial staff as shown here: [1]. So it's actually perfectly reliable. The issue is there isn't much of a review here: it looks like Cynthia repeats the press release information about the game, and briefly mentions her kids had fun but some puzzles were hard. One to include but unsure if this is a strong anchor for notability.
[6] ☒N The NYT are obviously reliable, but the only brief mention is just repeating the sales charts. No actual coverage and doesn't tell us anything new compared to [1], although worth including to corroborate.
[7] ☒N Worth including for the release date and fact it was showcased at E3, but is just a trivial mention.
[8] ☒N Worth including to note the VA for Cruella also did this game, but again, is just a trivial mention.
So almost there. Opinions differ on whether [3]-[5] would satisfy WP:THREE, I'd personally say almost but not quite, on the basis that only Allgame comfortably provides depth on the game, although the other two are close but just don't have enough to say. Have you checked the Internet Archive? ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:05, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I will keep looking then. It's possible there are more reviews and sources out there.
RE Internet Archive: I've indeed checked the Internet Archive but I found nothing there. Timur9008 (talk) 09:22, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are absolutely on the right track and apologies if this was a bit discouraging. What you are doing is good - finding the sources to scope out notability before going all in. If, even without three reviews, looking at the totality of the sources you've found, you think you can defensibly say there's enough coverage to describe the game and its reception, you could always have a crack at a draft and see how another editor feels. I am probably on the more conservative side of what's notable compared to other editors. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:34, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Terminator: Future Shock

[edit]

Hi! :) You previously helped me expand Gridiron!. Was wondering can you help expand The Terminator: Future Shock? If possible. Timur9008 (talk) 12:07, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Luxuria Superbia is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Luxuria Superbia is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dentsinhere43 -- Dentsinhere43 (talk) 10:08, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited XSN Sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Top Spin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft feedback

[edit]

You may be interested in this [2]. Vacosea (talk) 22:42, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Return to Castle Wolfenstein

[edit]

Hello, Vrxces. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Return to Castle Wolfenstein".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]