User talk:Vacosea

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Template talk:Neoconservatism in China

[edit]

Guotaian keeps waging a 'move' war.## You've edited that template too, so can you join me in this talk page? ProKMT (talk) 07:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:IntelBroker not required

[edit]

Several months ago, I created the article IntelBroker, which covers the scope of Draft:IntelBroker. I've noticed that you have edited Draft:IntelBroker several times since the main article's creation. It would be great if you could migrate these contributions to the mainspace article. CitrusHemlock 02:03, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do plan to do that. By the way does this mean an article with identical name can be created even if there is a draft? Vacosea (talk) 19:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An article and a draft can coexist, as they technically have a different title (the latter being prepended with 'Draft:'). Also, thank you so much for merging the information, its greatly appreciated. CitrusHemlock 20:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Massive POV push and content removals by new user

[edit]

Hi Vacosea! I noticed that the new user User:WinterExiled (edit history) has been making massive POV push and removing contents without explanations recently. I saw you reverted some of his edits earlier, but his behaviors apparently continued in various articles especially those related to Tibet. Please take a look at this. Thanks! --Wengier (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I will take a look. Vacosea (talk) 20:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Historical sources are not "legends"

[edit]

Hi Vacosea, I noticed on Thomni Sambhota that you inserted your POV regarding 7+ reputable scholars of Tibet's history (RA Stein, Arpi, Monlam, Chhospel, Yeshe De Projet, Shakabpa, Choephel, others), by inserting the word "legends" at least 3 times to denigrate their contributions to the encyclopedic entry. In English, the word 'legend' implies make-believe, fairy-tale. The works of these respected scholars are not children's fairy-tales. Please review WP:POV and check this unhelpful compulsion. 2400:1A00:B040:9611:1B54:CAF8:3FFB:D72A (talk) 08:59, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. In English, legend means a traditional story or popular account that is not authenticated, not necessarily saying it is false. You can look this up in dictionaries or Google.
The life of Tonmi Sambhoṭa is "largely shrouded in legend", which I quote from a generally pro-Tibetan source [1]. This is consistent with research from the Institut national des langues et civilisations orientales, specifically, "Little is known about the exact origins of Tibetan script. According to tradition, the creation of this writing system is associated with King Songtsen Gampo, who unified Tibet and reigned between 620 and 645 CE. According to other sources, however, writing spread to Tibet via Kashmir and Turkestan" [2]. It is also consistent with other research that states "the legend of Tönmi Sambhota ... It is difficult, if not impossible, to determine whether such a person existed – let alone whether he really did invent a script" [3].
I would also like to remind you that editing logged out as or on behalf of another editor, especially someone who has been blocked, may be against various Wikipedia policies. Vacosea (talk) 18:54, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality concerns

[edit]

I'm pretty concerned that your recent edits to Forced organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China are rather non-neutral. These include:

  • Repeated removal of academic sources for unclear reasons.
  • Removal of the context that the China Tribunal is non-governmental despite being headed by a politician.
  • Insertion of claims from the Victims of Communism Foundation

I would sincerely ask you to self-revert any of these issues that remain after your recent revisions and come to article talk to discuss these edits. Simonm223 (talk) 11:45, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bold edits were made mostly to reduce the undue length of some sections, but I'm happy to discuss. Vacosea (talk) 18:42, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:IntelBroker

[edit]

Hello, Vacosea. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "IntelBroker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]