User talk:Thegoofhere

Users blanking their talk pages

Just so you know, it's fine for users to blank their talk pages instead of archiving them, under WP:OWNTALK. It at least confirms to us that they saw the messages. Belbury (talk) 08:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AIGHT Thegoofhere (talk) 13:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Thegoofhere! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Golem08 (talk) 14:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Italian brainrot did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Pbritti (talk) 03:13, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Italian brainrot shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You can be blocked for violating WP:3RR. I recommend you revert yourself. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:20, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Italian brainrot and restrictions

I hadn't seen it before, but the article Italian brainrot is currently under a Arbitration Committee restriction. This restriction means only extended-confirmed editors can edit the article and that only one revert is permitted per 24-hour period. Since I did not see this restriction until I opened the talk page, I assume you didn't either. Unfortunately, this means you can not edit the article until you are an extended-confirmed editor, which happens automatically once you reach a few milestones as a registered editor. If you have questions, respond here or my talk page. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:32, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

italian brainrot is amazin 2A02:C7C:E422:2B00:5508:60C9:B177:58A1 (talk) 19:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ikr Thegoofhere (talk) 19:57, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. This notice is in reference to the part of the Italian brainrot article that is related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 09:17, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hi Thegoofhere! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 04:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What article is it Thegoofhere (talk) 04:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This happened in numerous articles: 1, 2, 3. Just wanted to let you know for future edits. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 05:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chromebook challenge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chromebook challenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chromebook challenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Launchballer 09:58, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meanie :( Thegoofhere (talk) 19:46, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Sparta remix (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Thegoofhere/sandbox/Sparta remix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 07:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thegoofhere! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 07:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why exactly though Thegoofhere (talk) 23:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Free Puff (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Free Puff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 01:12, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]