User talk:NeoGaze

Archives

Draft:George Galanopoulos (basketball)

Recently you rejected the draft Draft:George Galanopoulos (basketball). However, the same user who created that draft created the page George Galanopoulos (basketball coach) before then in an identical manner, suggesting that this page should not still be in the mainspace. Presumably, they waited until they no longer had to do it as a draft. Sushidude21! (talk) 06:43, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me, and indeed that is kind of annoying, as it dowplays the efforts of the AFC. That basketball coach still seems to not be notable enough. I have slightly improved it and added a notability template, but that is as far as I will go now. If you think more drastic action is needed, you may redraft the article or even nominate for deletion (this one should be the last resort, all things considered). In the end, submitting drafts to the AFC is optional, and we can't really punish users who bypass it (I'm not even sure it would be convenient to do so in the long term). Best wishes! NeoGaze (talk) 08:35, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I need someone to review a draft for me

at Greenstreet I have no one Sunny's Highway 27(Maxwell Jacquin) 22:31, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I made some improvements, but I still think the place has no notability, and thus its doomed to fail as an article. NeoGaze (talk) 09:21, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what are some points that make the article non-notable Sunny's Highway 27(Maxwell Jacquin) 20:37, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not inherent to any topic just by existing, otherwise everything would be notable and deserving of an article. This also applies to locations and settlements. Most of the references in the drafts are maps and statistics, which don't show notability. The place would be notable, for example, if it was the origin of some notable people, if some important event took place there, if it has a substantial history, etc. All of this covered by reliable and independent sources. NeoGaze (talk) 21:06, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

then the mass redrafting begins Sunny's Highway 27(Maxwell Jacquin) 21:13, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's a good idea, you're going to get blocked again if you keep pushing this draft. NeoGaze (talk) 22:02, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

...SOOO, look at the article because there are more changes Sunny's Highway 27(Maxwell Jacquin) 00:22, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August music

Today's story - short version: ten years ago we had a DYK about a soprano who sang in concerts with me in the choir, - longer: I found today a youtube of an aria she sang with us then, recorded the same year, - if you still have time: our performances were the weekend before the Iraq war ultimatum, and we sang Dona nobis pacem (and the drummer drummed!) as if they could hear us in Washington. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:01, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Check out my talk for an Independence day, or: the pic of Oksana Lyniv was taken on 24 August. There's listening and reading in today's story, and I like both. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:14, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On top of my talk: birthday of a great violinist and Requiem for a great friend. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:11, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My Artist Userboxes

Thanks for your edits adding my userbox pages to Category:Artist fan user templates. I reversed what you settled on though, since the page you added displays all the userboxes I have created. I added templates to display the variations on my Arists userbox, and added the category on that page instead. That should be more helpful to any users exploring this category, because I have some unrelated userboxes on my main Userboxes hub. Just wanted to reach out and explain what I did since I reversed both of your edits! TNstingray (talk) 19:11, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I initially tried to put the category on the page dedicated to the artist userboxes, but they didn't appear, so I went for what seemed the best alternative (I didn't want to edit your page). NeoGaze (talk) 21:23, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template categorization in noinclude tags

Please note that per template categorization guidelines, the category wikitext for templates goes inside a pair of <noinclude>...</noinclude> tags. Example: Special:Diff/1307405760. —⁠andrybak (talk) 12:50, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, all my userboxes already include these tags. Do you mention this for another reason? NeoGaze (talk) 15:23, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because your previous edits to some user templates added categorization incorrectly: Special:Diff/1307222839, Special:Diff/1307222777, Special:Diff/1307222826. —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry then. I didn't realise. Thanks for fixing my mistake! NeoGaze (talk) 20:34, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for Review of Draft:Mehdar

Dear Sir,

I had written an article a few weeks ago which has not been reviewed till now. I request you to please read it once and if you find any mistake then please comment on it and if it is correct then please approve it.

Thank you,

~ Bihari Editor ^(Talk) 15:58, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will give it a look later today. NeoGaze (talk) 16:02, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time on my article. (I have another but forget it.) Bihari Editor ^(Talk) 02:52, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review questions

Thank you for your review of my article (Draft:Antoine Guenet)! I've addressed the dead links and one of the three verification fails but have questions regarding the remaining two. I hope this is the right place for that. If not, please disregard this message.

For the first verification fail (Brussels Philharmonic), the link mentions the band and its lineup at that date is known from the album releases that are verified elsewhere. However if the musicians have to be mentioned by name, I can't find such a source. Should I remove the mention of that collaboration altogether?

For the second (Univers Zéro - Phosphorescent Dreams), I'm a little bit confused that it failed verification since the link says (in biography):

"In July 2013 the lineup of Denis, Budé, Evers, keyboardist Antoine Guenet (the Wrong Object, SH.TG.N), and guitarist Nicolas Dechêne (Turlu Tursu), plus selected guests, entered Studio Dingo in Soignies, Belgium to record the 13th Univers Zero album, Phosphorescent Dreams."

What am I missing?

Thank you very much, again for the review, and in advance for your help. Xunston (talk) 21:12, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, good job so far! About the first verification fail, it would be enough if you just reused the reference with the information of that album, as I see it mentions the performers. About the second verification, the issue is that the source doesn't explicity state that Antoine Guenet contributed to the album "Phosphorescent Dreams". You can use the Allmusic page of that album in order to support that statement. Probably I should have commented on that issue when I did my review in order to be clearer.

Hope I have been helpful, thank you for your quick work. NeoGaze (talk) 21:36, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great thank you, it was very helpful. I applied your remarks then, I hope it's satisfactory now. Xunston (talk) 09:11, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great, seems like everything is alright you should resubmit it then. NeoGaze (talk) 14:31, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great thanks, it's done :) Xunston (talk) 15:18, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if you're not the person to ask, but does this restart the whole waiting process to get someone to review again, or are you allowed to review again to simply check that I applied the requested changes?

Thanks! Xunston (talk) 15:11, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I usually don't rereview drafts, but I can do an exception for you. I have a question before: Do you have a conflict of interest with the subject? I say so because because of the COI template dated July 2025. If that is the case, you should disclose it in your user page or in the draft's talk page. NeoGaze (talk) 17:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's very nice! I do and I disclosed it the way Wikipedia asked to when creating the draft, it appears below your review. Is that what you're referring to? I added it to the draft's talk page in any case. Xunston (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah completely passed over it, the draft has been reviewed and accepted. If possible you should add wikilinks to articles that mention this person, if there are any. NeoGaze (talk) 19:00, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks, I'll look into that! Xunston (talk) 19:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

David Rendall

Hi NeoGaze,

I am Elizabeth, David Rendall's first daughter from his first marriage and I wanted to inform you that David Rendall had two children to his first wife. I've found that the Times Obituary confirms this: https://groups.io/g/crusting-pipe/topic/david_rendall_obituary/114546010

Please can you change "a daughter" to "two children" with this source? Thank you for your help with the article. Elizabethrendall (talk) 23:32, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Elizabeth, nice to meet you. A quick question: is the content of that mail the same as in The Times obituary? If that is the case, then I will gladly upate the article myself. Unfortunately I cannot access the article as I don't have a premium account. NeoGaze (talk) 12:49, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NeoGaze, yes it is the same. Here is the Times link, although you need a subscription to read it. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/obituaries/article/david-rendallo-obituary-talented-tenor-discovered-in-bbc-back-room-tgmjjf76w?gclsrc=aw.ds

Thanks again. Elizabethrendall (talk) 20:05, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor already changed that part as you requested, so I merely added the obituary as a reference. NeoGaze (talk) 21:40, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That AFC Post

Did you look at that AFC post that was just boxed? I think that the poster may be either a hard-shelled fruit or a threaded metallic fastener. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:52, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I saw it after waking up, kind of amusing to see. I tried to come to reason with him in his talk page after he started accusing me, but that didn't work out. Well, hopefully he will focus on something else now. NeoGaze (talk) 21:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Overture in D major (Yamada) has been accepted

Overture in D major (Yamada), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fade258 (talk) 14:07, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Kōsaku Yamada has been accepted

Template:Kōsaku Yamada, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

QEnigma 论 04:18, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for Review of Draft:Ramgarh, Siwan

Dear @NeoGaze, I hope you are doing well. I here, to requesting you to review my draft article, if all ok in my article. If you found something error or incorrect, please tell me to improve it.

Thank you for your time in advance.

~ Bihari Editor ^(Talk) 06:45, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have just reviewed the draft, check my feedback. NeoGaze (talk) 15:35, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Chapter 2 (company)

Look, i finally discovered that the draft article for Mediawan's unit Chapter 2 had been declined once again, maybe that it's time that the draft article would be deleted for good? 82.6.137.98 (talk) 08:46, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't give up yet! I suggest you search for sources that talk about the company directly an that are substantial, independent and reliable. The sources that are present in the draft point towards notability, but are mostly incidental. If you can find them, I think the draft has a high chance of being approved. Its not necessary they are available online, or only in English. You can add sources in French for example, where I guess there is a higher chance of more coverage on the company. NeoGaze (talk) 11:44, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's no use actually, in fact the draft article wasn't upgraded ever since it was declined again for a second time and no one hasn't updated the draft article for Chapter 2. I'm sorry but I think it's time that the draft article should be deleted. 82.6.137.98 (talk) 10:21, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cheyenne Mountain High School did some more to it can I nominate it for GA?

Thanks! Tokeamour (talk) 18:56, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please review my recent contributions. Tokeamour (talk) 18:56, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You know what I'm just going to nominate it, though I still suggest you review it and make your own assumption whether its ready or not. Tokeamour (talk) 19:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will take an in depht look at it tomorrow, you want me to give my feedback here, in the article's talk page or in your talk page? NeoGaze (talk) 19:51, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

here Tokeamour (talk) 20:53, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NeoGaze I almost forgot to tell ya: thanks! Tokeamour (talk) 20:55, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my feedback about the issues I found.

Second opening paragraph need citations, in particular this phrase: "Founded as Cheyenne Mountain District Twelve (D12), it graduated its first class in 1872."
A citation for extracurricular activities should also be added in the following pharagraph.
Reference 12 leads to Kiddle, which is a service that in turns leads to Wikipedia itself, which is this one. It is not acceptable to have wikipedia itself as a reference, but you may use references from that article to support the statement.
The phrase "Cheyenne Mountain High School, had been of increasing controversy because of its use of the Cheyenne Mountain Indian mascot" is extremely awkward. I suggest rephrasing it to something like: "The Cheyenne Mountain Indian is the mascot of the High School, which has been the subject of increasing controversy".
A citation is needed for the following: "Limited due to the COVID−19 pandemic (2019–2023), a group of students gathered to protest at the high school parking lot during a school board meeting taking place at night."
In the awards section, a reference is needed to verify that the high school is indeed recipient of the National Blue Ribbon School. The reference that is found after the following two phrases also do not seem to support the previous statements: (The 2024 U.S News & World Report high school rankings listed Cheyenne Mountain as #849 in its National Rankings and #24 in its Colorado High School Rankings. It was also rated the #1 school in Colorado, by Niche.com in 2023.)
Another citation is needed for the The minimum graduation requirements in the next section.
The opening statement of the "Athletics" section (Cheyenne Mountain has offered athletic programs since 1916.) isn't actually supported by the citation.
The source of the following phrase (As of 2025, the school offered 28 varsity sport teams.) has a dead link. Thankfully it has been archived.
The same happens to reference 25 in athletics. It has been archived as well
In the alumni section, citations are needed for Todd Gilles, Matt Darwin, Brandon McCarthy, Dave Mlicki and Floyd K. Lindstrom (you can reuse one of the previous references for the latter)
The source for Brandon Mroz is completely dead, and it has not been archived. I recommend you subtitute for a working one it if possible. The same goes for Steve Johnson
The source of Alex Shibutani doesn't mention the high school at all, and the same for Johann Sebastian Paetsch.

NeoGaze (talk) 09:56, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well then, I will address the issues! Tokeamour (talk) 18:31, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NeoGaze How do I address the US World one as I cant cite it but its there? Tokeamour (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NeoGaze

Apart from problems with linking US News & World Report your ideas are done feel free to take a look and be bold and discredit me for missing one. Tokeamour (talk) 19:28, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here's more of my feedback after your changes, pretty good job so far! A few of the previous issues were not adressed, so I will repeat them just in case.

In the infobox, the source of the Principal Carrie Brenner has a dead link, which couldn't be recovered.
In the awards section, a reference is needed to verify that the high school is indeed recipient of the National Blue Ribbon School, not only the John Irwin School of Excellence.
To support or modify the following statement (The 2024 U.S News & World Report high school rankings listed Cheyenne Mountain as #849 in its National Rankings and #24 in its Colorado High School Rankings. It was also rated the #1 school in Colorado, by Niche.com in 2023.) you can use this report I found as a source.
I still suggest you find a better source for the following statement (Cheyenne Mountain has offered athletic programs since the 20th century), as the source doesn't say when the program actually began.
In the alumni section, citations are still needed for Todd Gilles.

I think that will be all. Also I have made some edits to improve some things myself. NeoGaze (talk) 20:41, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NeoGaze 90% done Tokeamour (talk) 21:14, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@NeoGaze

Not credible

:"Cheyenne Mountain has offered athletic programs since the 20th century." no additional source can be found Tokeamour (talk) 21:19, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts? Tokeamour (talk) 21:20, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Everything else is done thanks for the help! Tokeamour (talk) 21:27, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(1) unreferenced claim removed due to a statement from another source making the claim untrue: (removed Todd Gilles) Tokeamour (talk) 21:35, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest removing that sentence. I searched for a source that talks in detail about the early athletic programs of the high school, but found nothing. NeoGaze (talk) 08:50, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September music

My story today is about the principal violin of the Concentus Musicus; she would have been 95 OTD. I felt connected when the second oboist of our recent concert, of Haydn's Stabat Mater, said that he built an English horn for his performance of the work with the Concentus Musicus. - Concert weekend pictured in "places". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:12, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Your addition to Symphony No. 23 (Mozart) has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases, especially if they are not attributed to their source, may constitute copyright violation and/or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not post it on any page, even if you plan to fix it later. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian 💌🦋 06:23, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There's a WMF online quiz thingymabob that explains the issue much better than the template; you can find it at this link: https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/training/editing-wikipedia/plagiarism . GreenLipstickLesbian 💌🦋 06:24, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing one of my pages – could you please review another one?

Hi @NeoGaze,

Thank you so much for reviewing and approving my page on Dan Epps. If you have any time, would you please review a similar page I have drafted on Professor Jon D. Michaels? I recently revised it to add many more secondary sources, in accordance with the prior reviewer's feedback.

Draft:Jon D. Michaels

Thank you so much! I really appreciate your time and consideration. Escola Cola (talk) 21:47, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I will take a look at it later today. NeoGaze (talk) 10:33, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Only issue I found is that the lead is too short, otherwise excellent job! NeoGaze (talk) 12:04, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, @NeoGaze! That really means a lot to me. I hope you have a great day! Escola Cola (talk) 17:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasure's mine, and thank you too for your kindness NeoGaze (talk) 23:34, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sam Badi

Hia @NeoGaze. The draft author of Draft:Sam Badi, @Chandl3r45, came into #wikipedia-en-help earlier today asking about this draft. They've previously received some help from myself and other helpers in the channel regarding this draft. My gut feeling was sources #2, #3, and #5 were fine, but I recused myself from reviewing it originally as I'd helped so much on it.

What are your thoughts? qcne (talk) 16:23, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, the main issues of that draft aren't the sources (although more would be welcomed) but the promotional tone and notability. I don't think I need to explain the first, so I will focus on the second. No company or organization is considered inherently notable. To be brief, an organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.

The only elements that point towards notability are the GQ Italia source and the Trendhunter report, and even then its not enough in my eyes, as Wikipedia has higher standards of notability for companies and organizations in general. Perhaps with more context and sources, the notability of this company would become clearer, but as of now that is not the case. Is the draft unsalvable? Not really, ideally the tone would be revised to become more neutral, more context should be added as well as more sources. I decided to reject the draft after seeing it had been declined three times, as it seemed to me the editor just didn't catch the memo. If the issues are adressed, I would happily revert my rejection. NeoGaze (talk) 23:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Articles for Creation review on Insurgency in South Tyrol

Hello NeoGaze. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Insurgency in South Tyrol is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Insurgency in South Tyrol will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Overture in D major (Yamada)

On 15 October 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Overture in D major (Yamada), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kōsaku Yamada's Overture in D major has been described as "a kind of challenge by the composer to Japanese traditional music"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Overture in D major (Yamada). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Overture in D major (Yamada)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2025 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you for another interesting piece of music! - marked to be sung "Happily" for me --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for improving article quality in October. My latest: Roberta Alexander, - listen. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:13, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delightful voice to hear, thanks for sharing Gerda. NeoGaze (talk) 22:23, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for listening! Today Sequenza III on Luciano Berio's centenary. You can listen with the score or to the first performer, Cathy Berberian (link in the work's article), - I couldn't decide ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:13, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gerda, I'm familiar with this piece, as I studied it in university whe I took some music courses. I personally like more the cello sequenza, but thanks for sharing! NeoGaze (talk) 13:13, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also prefer the cello piece, therefore wrote the article last year ;) - I wanted a little birthday gift for Berio's centenary, and the piece seemed right, as privately and artistically relevant. A DYK nom (not by me) is open, in case you are interested to review. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I will happily take a look at it later today. NeoGaze (talk) 14:14, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Three Dances (Górecki) has been accepted

Three Dances (Górecki), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 15:43, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for Review of Draft:Role of the Sri Lankan Home Guards in the Sri Lankan Civil War

Greetings,

I wrote an article a few weeks ago. I would like to request a review from you. If you find the article is appropriate, please approve it. If there are any mistakes, I would appreciate any comments for improvement. Thank you for your consideration. RajaRajaC (talk) 05:57, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will take a look at it tomorrow. NeoGaze (talk) 22:21, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

G6 done

You can accept Draft:Angela Harris (Coronation Street) now. Toadspike [Talk] 01:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Three Dances (Górecki)

Hello! Your submission of Three Dances (Górecki) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:00, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal / Resubmission Note for Draft: Tim Tomažič

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for taking the time to review the draft about Tim Tomažič. I understand and appreciate your feedback regarding sourcing and notability, and I would like to respectfully appeal the decline by providing additional clarification and context to demonstrate that the subject meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for athletes (WP:NATHLETE).

1. Notability under WP:NATHLETE

Tim Tomažič is a professional basketball player currently competing in the Slovenian First Division (1. SKL) with KD Ilirija, as well as in the Adriatic League (ABA League) — both of which are recognized top-tier professional leagues in Europe. Participation in a country’s top-level professional competition satisfies the key notability criteria for athletes.

2. Career achievements and recognition

Active player in KD Ilirija, a club competing at the highest level in Slovenian basketball.

Has competed in the ABA League, a major international competition that includes leading teams from the Balkans, comparable to other FIBA-recognized regional leagues.

Featured in multiple independent and reliable sports outlets covering professional basketball in Slovenia and the Adriatic region.

3. Sources and reliability

I have ensured that the article references independent, reliable, and verifiable sources, including official league websites, sports news coverage, and player databases recognized by the basketball community (e.g., Eurobasket, FIBA profiles, and ABA League official stats). These sources establish both verifiability and independent coverage, in line with Wikipedia’s general notability guidelines.

4. Clarification on Conflict of Interest disclosure

Regarding the COI note, I acknowledge the declaration made and assure that the draft’s intent is purely informational and written from a neutral point of view, following Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability standards.

Conclusion

Given that Tim Tomažič competes in top-tier professional leagues, has independent coverage in multiple reliable sources, and meets athlete notability standards, I kindly request a reconsideration of the draft. I am happy to make further improvements to the article structure, sourcing, or tone as needed.

Thank you very much for your time and review.

Best regards M. Skornik (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Skornik. I can see that subject MAY be notable, but this is not reflected at all in the sourcing provided. Pages that provide stats and superficial coverage on the subject (like a few sentences or a small pharagraph) do not lead to demostrate notability. Only two sources are worth mentioning; the aba-liga and the eurobasket ones, but for me these are not enough to demostrate the notability of the subject.

Seeing that the draft has not been changed since I declined it, these issues persist. If you wish you can resubmit it and let another person take a look at it, but I recommend you improve it first if possible. If the subject is notable as you claim, there should be articles and reports on his achievements, as I have seen in other drafts on athletes I have reviewed and accepted. NeoGaze (talk) 16:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: \v\ (imageboard) has been accepted

\v\ (imageboard), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Somepinkdude (talk) 14:22, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know the title has backslashes in it. This was my mistake, and I moved the page to the correct location "/v/". Somepinkdude (talk) 14:49, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable mistake, don't worry about it. Thanks for reviewing the draft! NeoGaze (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2020 F1600 Championship Series

Sorry to disturb you,

it is my first time i am trying to make a wiipedia page (actually more than 1),

I would ask you how i can improve the page; (i already know i have recently violated copyrights how you said) but an other guy before you said that i didn't put enough seources in Draft:2024 F1600 Championship Series

How can i actually see if i have "enough sources" linked in the page, without violating any copyright?

Thank you (and sorry for my bad english)

I actually removed the link https://formulascout.com/2020-international-formula-ford-season-review/72960 Alessandro User (talk) 21:55, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. Don't worry too much about the copyright stuff, jut make sure to not copypaste text from sources with copyright and instead add the info in your own words. There is no need to remove the reference itself as you have done (I reverted that edit, in case you haven't seen it), that is not the issue at all. About sourcing itself and to make it simple, every single statement should be supported by a proper reference; from the introductory pharagraphs to the list of winners themselves. You don't need put a reference for every winner but a single one for each list should suffice.

Hope this helps! if you have any other quetion, please reply me back NeoGaze (talk) 11:53, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry for the missunderstand;

so i don't have to copy full senteces about other websites (got it)

But after that, i still don't know when i can resubmit the work again

I mean... we deleted the mistake (the full sentence), so... to fix it, should i make a little summary from my *own* in the description and submit again for review? Is it correct?

Sorry for disturbing you again Alessandro User (talk) 12:28, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I ask you that, because probably i did the same mistake in Draft:2019_F1600_Championship_Series and in Draft:2024 F1600 Championship Series Alessandro User (talk) 12:36, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I recommend you readd the removed info, but this time in your own words and avoiding close pharaphrasing. I will take a look at those drafts in a few hours. NeoGaze (talk) 17:40, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you very much, i have done all the changes (i also put the the links below the description) Alessandro User (talk) 21:11, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed and accepted them, you can resubmit the 2020 one if you're done. NeoGaze (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you (i resubmited the 2020 one); Should i focus on 2024 article to see new sources? Alessandro User (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If possible yes, cheers for your first articles! NeoGaze (talk) 22:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again, and for your help on improving them Alessandro User (talk) 22:26, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry again, an other question; idk if the mark "Start, C, B and A" and so on really matter; but actually i improved also the pages of 2021-23; should you like change the mark, or it is not that important at all? - the pages aren't mines also, but idk if it helps, or you can do something about it, (it is to clearify some my doubts, sorry about disturbing you again) Alessandro User (talk) 23:38, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This page talks about the content assessment scale used in Wikipedia. Take a look at it. NeoGaze (talk) 23:43, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again Alessandro User (talk) 23:45, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Jacek Malczewski has been accepted

Template:Jacek Malczewski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikishovel (talk) 15:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline on IP talk page still says copyvio

User talk:24.50.56.74#Your submission at Articles for creation: List of uses for At sign in computing (November 22) still says the AfC draft "has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content". Could you correct that or remove it, as appropriate? NebY (talk) 18:42, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, forgot about that. Thanks again, I really made a mess over there. NeoGaze (talk) 18:48, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I once found the lead of History of slavery citing a passage in a book that was copied from Wikipedia! NebY (talk) 22:13, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation backlog drive

Hello NeoGaze:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in December!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than half a month of outstanding reviews from the current 2+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 December 2025 through 31 December 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.