User talk:MrMeAndMrMe

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanley Pickett Rockwell (October 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Rockwell scale. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not really independently notable from either the family or the Rockwell scale that he co-created
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 21:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, MrMeAndMrMe! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 21:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stanley Pickett Rockwell has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stanley Pickett Rockwell. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 09:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Polonaise in G Minor, Opus Posthumous (Chopin). Thanks! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:
Too short to justify a standalone article: instead, this information and especially these references should be added to the woefully inadequate Polonaises, Op. posth. (Chopin).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bilorv (talk) 22:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToBeFree was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phoebe Gaa (January 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rusalkii (talk) 03:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RandomCanadian was:
Submission is not of the standard one would expect from an encyclopedia entry (even a bare minimum stub article). There are many obvious errors (for example, the use of the term "movement" is incorrect), nonsense (how is "Fuga II is noted as the only published piece of Chopin's work that doesn't have an octave doubling in it" when this is a work by Mendelssohn?), misrepresentation of sources (source no. 2 does not mention "discipline", nor even the subject of this article), shoddy writing (the whole of the lead), and a lack of actual encyclopedic content beyond a mere listing of the pieces.

IMSLP is not a reliable source, as it is user-generated content. Individual editions there may be used as primary sources, with the usual caution of WP:PRIMARY, but the rest of the information it contains should be traced back to more reputable sources if possible.

The master's thesis is at best a dubious source (given the usual concerns, see the relevant paragraph at WP:SCHOLARSHIP) given it does not seem to have had any significant impact (no citations on google scholar; nor does the author seem to be an influential figure). A good idea might be to look at the sources cited in the thesis, to see if these discuss these pieces in sufficient detail.

Allmusic is just a database and should be replaced with more serious scholarly works if at all possible.

Looking in databases like RILM or repositories like JSTOR might be more productive.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:04, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RandomCanadian was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
IMSLP is not a reliable source; and the Naxos liner notes do not contain any useful content about this beyond a database-like listing. Content is also not sufficient to warrant a lone article at this stage. This could just as well be included in List of compositions by Louis Spohr if it cannot be expanded
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

21:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

[edit]

Before adding a "dead url" tag to a ref, check to see if an archived version exists using the Wayback Machine. There quite often does, and an example adding archive markup can be seen here. - wolf 15:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi MrMeAndMrMe! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:10, Friday, February 18, 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi MrMeAndMrMe! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:10, Friday, February 18, 2022 (UTC)

19:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

[edit]
Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Phylicia Whitney.
Message added 06:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:13, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Beatriz Rico (neuroscientist)

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Beatriz Rico (neuroscientist) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, and sorry for the wait! MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 23:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Massacre of Tamines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civic Guard. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Housing in North Dakota (March 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
None of the sources cited discuss the concept of 'housing in ND' per se; therefore notability is not established (and IMO this is borderline OR by synthesis).

Perhaps this subject would be better covered as a section in the main North Dakota article?

--
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Phylicia Whitney

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Phylicia Whitney at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik (talk) 02:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bloomfield, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bloomfield and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bloomfield during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CUPIDICAE💕 03:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Morocco national team

[edit]

Hello, as u can see an unknown person edited the page and went on removing the morocco national team info box and added criticisms and controversies before history without stating any evidence. All made up. Pls i request u check on it and hope u undo the changes edited by an ip address user 88.201.18.20 (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. If it is unreffed, please mentioned why in the edit summary. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 19:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Global sysops/Requests

[edit]

Can be made at META:Global sysops/Requests. Cheers, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Beatriz Rico (neuroscientist)

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Beatriz Rico (neuroscientist) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a subsequent review, and new issues need to be addressed. It sounds like things are close, but the nomination is now over four months old, so please return as soon as possible. Thank you! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:07, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 01:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Beatriz Rico (neuroscientist)

[edit]

On 9 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Beatriz Rico (neuroscientist), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that neuroscientist Beatriz Rico and her team discovered a link between a protein called Brevican and short-term spatial memory? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beatriz Rico (neuroscientist). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Beatriz Rico (neuroscientist)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:American chess journal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:American chess journal

[edit]

Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "American chess journal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Housing in North Dakota, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Strand

[edit]

Earlier this year, you undid an edit on Jan Strnad by an editor who was purporting to be the subject... and was. It's an understandable instinct, due to lack of reference, COI concerns, and uncertainty whether it was really the subject posting. However, in reverting the edit due to a concern over unsourced BLP material, you managed to reinsert a birth date that was not only unsourced, but also according to the subject, inaccurate. (You can see him noting the inaccuracy in the comments under this Facebook post.) Could you kindly review your reversion, and either restore the date he put or, better yet, remove the birth date altogether until a source can be found? (I'd take care of it myself, but I'm trying to maintain a retirement from article editing.) --Nat Gertler (talk) 04:33, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@NatGertler yes, I can do this tomorrow morning. thank you for the notice and have a good day or night. 96.3.81.73 (talk) 04:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to hear it! Thanks! --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@NatGertler alright, looks like it's been done. I haven't found any other reliable sources, however according to some essay or guideline that I forgot the name of, if he says something untrivial such as a birth year it is probably reliable. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 15:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Housing in North Dakota

[edit]

Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Housing in North Dakota".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:07, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stanley Pickett Rockwell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:25, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Intermediate Geographic Region of Porto Velho, is not suitable as written to remain published.The single link does not corroborate the information in the article, it is a link to a database, rather than to specific sourcing about the entity. I've moved your draft, along with the other microstubs you created similarly sourced, to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:26, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The reference for this particular one should be: <ref>{{cite web | url=https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv100600.pdf |page=38 | publisher=IBGE | title=Divisao Regional do Brasil | accessdate= December 30, 2022}}</ref>. Hope this helps.Onel5969 TT me 13:32, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This seems like something you could've just added into the article if that was the biggest problem with the article. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 02:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Housing in North Dakota

[edit]

Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Housing in North Dakota".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Intermediate Geographic Region of Cruzeiro do Sul, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Intermediate Geographic Region of Manaus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Intermediate Geographic Region of Porto Velho, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Intermediate Geographic Region of Rio Branco, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Intermediate Geographic Region of Ji-Paraná, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Intermediate Geographic Region of Porto Velho".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Intermediate Geographic Region of Rio Branco".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Intermediate Geographic Region of Ji-Paraná".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 23

[edit]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 24

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 25

[edit]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 26

[edit]

Concern regarding Draft:Youth drinking

[edit]

Information icon Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Youth drinking, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Youth drinking

[edit]

Hello, MrMeAndMrMe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Youth drinking".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Thanks for editing my article simple:Raphael (given name) Rafael Hello! 17:51, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 27

[edit]