User talk:Lalalalala7

Welcome!

[edit]

April 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Public Citizen v. Department of Justice has been reverted.
Your edit here to Public Citizen v. Department of Justice was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/491/440/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:57, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Kathy Joseph

[edit]

Hello, Lalalalllla7,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kathy Joseph should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Joseph .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

CapitalSasha ~ talk 05:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Lalalalllla7,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Marine Roussel, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 12:53, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An ISBN needs fixing

[edit]

Hi Lalalalllla7, Please note that this edit to Autumn Calabrese added a non-working ISBN to the article. Also, we usually avoid using an Amazon identifier (ASIN) if there is already a working ISBN. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:07, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Autumn Calabrese, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 03:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mignon Holland Anderson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination of Sean Perryman for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean Perryman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Perryman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 13:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sean Perryman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diversity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christine Barbe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kelsey Phelps Finch for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelsey Phelps Finch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelsey Phelps Finch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 03:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, Lalalalllla7. I have been looking through your recent articles and see most of them are biographies of women. You might like to become a member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. I'm sure you could help us along.--Ipigott (talk) 09:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

[edit]

Information icon It appears that you copied or moved text from Pizzeria Bianco to Chris Bianco. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 16:57, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Basir Ahang for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Basir Ahang, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basir Ahang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clare Dimyon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arnavaz Taraporevala for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arnavaz Taraporevala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnavaz Taraporevala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 19:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Beth Landrum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Marjorie Wang has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:33, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Ethel Spencer Lloyd is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Margaret Smagorinsky is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American female winemakers has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:American female winemakers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Joshua Marcuse

[edit]

Hello, Lalalalala7,

Thank you for creating Joshua Marcuse.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Could you pick the three sources you think that demonstrate notability. I don't think that being on the DIB is enough for notability by itself.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moritoriko}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Moritoriko (talk) 07:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Lalalalala7. Thank you for your work on Dorothy Danforth Compton. Another editor, Onel5969, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Very nice job on the article. Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 TT me 10:30, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beryl Radin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Academy of Public Administration.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, Lalalalala7, and welcome to Women in Red. In view of all the women's biographies you have created, it's high time you joined us. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 17:22, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]