User talk:ESkog

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will respond on your talk page unless you request otherwise.
Start a new talk topic.

Index of Talk Page archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F May 19-December 22, 2010 - December 23, 2010 - November 10, 2011 - December 8, 2011 - October 8, 2012 - October 18, 2012 - May 27, 2013 - May 30, 2013 - March 26, 2014 - January 29, 2015 - March 15, 2017 - April 12, 2017 - November 19, 2024

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing ESkog a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:38, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Eastfarthingan actually erased all my efforts to maintain information deviations. I tried to call but no one cared, while you were actively deleting a sentence that was considered my mistake. What should I think about your indifference to the false information about Vietnamese history? Are you also among racist cheers? Can you read Vietnamese to see his confusion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:800:FAD7:1531:14B2:8A1D:9C8D:5FCF (talk) 15:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You cannot read Vietnamese, but you try to maintain false information from the viewpoint of a boy boycott many times because of the abuse of power. If you respect the history, you did not do that. 2402:800:FAD7:1531:14B2:8A1D:9C8D:5FCF (talk) 15:35, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Read Wikipedia:NPOV please. Your edit did not follow the Wikipedia:MOS, and these edits were personal and unprofessional, which is not the setting Wikipedia wishes to achieve. If you have an edit you would like to make, be sure to read the MOS and use the talk page for anything further. Lavi edits stuff (talk) 15:36, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am just a normal contributor, so I really don't want to be aggressive in this hateful way. But you have provoked that through the unconsciousness and indifference irresponsible with historical information. 2402:800:FAD7:1531:14B2:8A1D:9C8D:5FCF (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All of your edits have been Wikipedia:NOTHERE. Please stop. Lavi edits stuff (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the false article is still maintained and the creator is still protected, then there will be more people attacking Wikipedia in the coming time. Because this article was shared by my group on official information channels of the State. This is a very important historical event for Vietnam, so all of you will definitely be disturbed. 2402:800:FAD7:1531:14B2:8A1D:9C8D:5FCF (talk) 15:41, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Instead of repairing dirty information, you block all the supply from people with more experienced. Therefore, you deserve punishment. 2402:800:FAD7:1531:14B2:8A1D:9C8D:5FCF (talk) 15:42, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the above user has been blocked; if this conversation continues it'll be on their Talk page. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:44, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They seemed unresponsive on their own talk page. Sorry for the pings you likely had to deal with. Lavi edits stuff (talk) 15:45, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle! Argh!

Huggle often places warning in the wrong section as was added to Dollyrohampton's talk page here. I moved yours and mine to the bottom of Dollyrohampton's talk page. I wish this would get fixed. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 19:43, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clara Coltman Rogers Vyvyan

Hello, I am adding dedications to the Clara Coltman Rogers Vyvyan bibliography to illustrate her network of friends and contacts. Could you please restore the work I have done so far? Thank you. 81.135.203.26 (talk) 22:43, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting

A vandal who vandlised question mark must've saw my account, because his username is similar to mine. Luckly you reverted it. Thank you. KoopaGamer (talk) 22:56, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for rapidly reverting all destructive changes to this platform

Your response time and rabid dedication regarding all suspicious edits are a credit in your favor. 93/100 2600:4041:5670:8F00:F14F:1AC3:3E41:875B (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access

Hi. 88.85.109.5 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) seems an bit upset. I wouldn't usually bother asking but they seem to intent. Knitsey (talk) 15:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GREAT

You are pure passion, pure meaning. 2802:8012:83:5200:8000:59C3:F4AB:E021 (talk) 11:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Explication

Bonjour c'est moi qui est modifié la page de stormworks sous une adresse IP avant de crée mon compte. Mes intentions n'étais pas de vandalisme la page mais de contribuer a elle . Je souhaitait ajouter une catégorie "mise a jour". Merci Skyy6127 (talk) 15:33, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

recent warning

about this warning, same thing as i said to another editor here. for what its worth i dont think theyre a vandal if you check their contribs and edit descriptions here⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾, but rather a lost newbie with a coi, might be a distinction without a difference. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 14:09, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent block evasion by a user you recently blocked

Hi there, you recently blocked User:Rylès HADJAR, but they seem to have created a new account User:DZ Rylès with the same user page content and similar edits. Rosbif73 (talk) 15:13, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, ESkog, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! RPE ✍️ 📚 03:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking the /64

Hi ESkog. I've noticed that you often block individual IPv6 addresses rather than a /64 range. Since many devices rotate the last part of the address, /64 blocks tend to be more effective, especially for blocks longer than a few hours. For example, if you look at your block of 2a01:e0a:120:88c0:b89f:ae5d:4a74:faac, there's a fair amount of disruption from other addresses on 2a01:e0a:120:88c0::/64 and that IP range has also been blocked recently. Blocking a /64 only affects a tiny portion of the IPv6 space (proportionally it's far less than a single IPv4 address compared to the whole of IPv4). If you use Twinkle, there's a checkbox option to use the /64 by default for IPv6 blocks. There's also an essay about this at WP:/64. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I didn't know that and that is definitely helpful info. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no fun allowed loser — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.187.0.12 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]