User talk:Discospinster

  1. Home
  2. Wiki


If you have come to my page to complain that I put your article in draft because it doesn't have any sources,
a better use of your time would be to add a source.


Caution PLEASE NOTE

If I have deleted your article and you would like to know why, please first have a look at the following Wikipedia policies and guidelines:

If none of these pages addresses your concerns you can
leave me a note
The Signpost
24 June 2025

Jewish revolt against heraclius

[edit]

I noticed that you said there was no result for the revolt, but there was, in the revolt itself the jews won and controlled jerusalem with the persians, the byzantines took it only after the revolt was over, but the revolt itself succeeded, and it is mentioned in the aftermath I dont need to send a proof the proof is there. 176.230.141.166 (talk) 22:50, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the proof? ... discospinster talk 16:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Literally written in ur own page, Omer9183 (talk) 16:05, 22 May 2025 (UTC)"After the successful Sasanian siege of Jerusalem,[45] Jews were given autonomy under Nehemiah Ben Hushiel and Benjamin of Tiberias.[46] Yet this period of Jewish autonomy in Jerusalem only lasted from 614–617, as the Persians did not go through with the plans of building a Third Temple, and soon after Hercalius re-conquered Jerusalem, Heraclius only took it later, but the Siege itself was over and the Jews won, so the revolt was a victory for the Jews.[reply]

Please block this vandalizing IP

[edit]

Hello there. You recently blocked an IP that was persistently vandalizing Tiraspol repeatedly. It seems they are now vandalizing Jorit in a similar fashion. Could you now block that new IP? The Sophocrat (talk) 03:18, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, User:Joyous! already blocked them. I don't know if someone has reported it somewhere but this particular vandal seems to be IP-hopping and vandalizing in a particular fashion. The Sophocrat (talk) 03:22, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They persist with their vandalism. When I see them I revert them, but they obstinately continue. As a non-admin I can't block them, and since they IP hop they need to be blocked constantly. Seeing as I can't block them and it isn't practical to call an admin each time, what should I do when I spot them? The Sophocrat (talk) 03:49, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately the only thing you can do is post on WP:ANI and possibly WP:RFPP to get the page protected. There are scripts that can help you do that quickly, see WP:TWINKLE for example. ... discospinster talk 17:40, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Thank you. The Sophocrat (talk) 19:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NYC: May 7 WikiWed + May 10 WikiCurious

[edit]
May 7: WikiWednesday Salon @ Prime Produce

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our WikiWednesday Salon at Prime Produce in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan. This month's WikiWednesday will be focused on digital safety for editors. Guest digital security trainers will join us to lead this session. All are welcome!

Please bring a laptop or the editing device of your choosing for hands-on training that will guide you through steps to take to make yourself safer online. While there will also be an online participation option, the meeting will not be recorded.

Meeting info:

May 10: Wikicurious – Amplifying Media Art with Rhizome

You are also invited to join the Wikimedia NYC Community and Rhizome for a community memory-focused edit-a-thon in the Financial District. All Wikipedia and Wikidata enthusiasts are welcome, new and experienced!

Please RSVP on Rhizome's event page to gain entry to the venue.

Meeting info:

All attendees at Wikimedia NYC events are subject to the Wikimedia NYC Code of Conduct and Photography Policy.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

White Sox General Manager

[edit]

Hello Mr. Discospinster,

I am wondering why my information about White Sox GM Chris Getz is being taken down, as I AM THE CREDIBLE SOURCE ( I am a neighbor of his) SoxEnthusiast (talk) 23:03, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles require reliable, published sources. ... discospinster talk 23:05, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

requesting for a protection of a wikipedia page to stop further Vandalism.

[edit]

Hello, I noticed you reverted some of the unnecessary edits made on Sanjay Malhotra wikipedia page. I would like to thank you for that. I am requesting for a protection of this wikipedia page to prevent it from further vandalism by these unknown IP addresses.

Thank you, BBM!SKM (talk) 09:48, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be quiet there at the moment. ... discospinster talk 16:06, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IP 2A04:4A43:874F:FE98:B532:1AA6:25D4:9A52

[edit]

You blocked this IP, but it is now making threats on its talk page. Would this warrant revoking the talk page access? randomdude121    16:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed their talk page access. ... discospinster talk 16:05, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

jason corbett

[edit]

thank you for your efforts in combating trolls trying to sabotage the above article, please consider making a request for the article to be semi protected against new editors WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 16:13, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FYI on block

[edit]

Note that I've modified your block of 2A04:4A43:874F:FE98:B532:1AA6:25D4:9A52 to the /64 range to prevent them from editing. Blocking a single IPv6 rarely prevents further disruption from the same individual as the generally have access to the range.-- Ponyobons mots 16:20, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

obvious socking following a recent ban of yours

[edit]
  • Willux1309 (talk · contribs) was blocked 15:25, 9 May 2025 for WP:NOTHERE[1]
  • The first edit they made added "owned by Samuel John Enderby 1" to Enderby Land
  • LStopek (talk · contribs) is created 17:11, 9 May 2025[2]
  • The first edit they make adds "The land was founded By Samuel John Enderby The 1st ..." to Enderby Land

fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I blocked them. ... discospinster talk 22:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hash Pipe

[edit]

Thanks for upholding my edits on the Hash Pipe article. Vaquita01 is still carrying out a genre war, claiming Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, a newspaper dating back to 1786, isn't reliable. Their edits are also suspiciously similar to the 216.145.66.233 range. CleoCat16 (talk) 03:04, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tjmaxx1234

[edit]

TPA might need revoking --Patient Zerotalk 01:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was just coming here to give you a heads-up that I just revoked TPA. Joyous! Noise! 02:01, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Joyous!! Patient Zerotalk 04:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question on reverting a change to a summary

[edit]

Hey there, you reverted a change to the summary on Dorian Yates despite it being factually correct, relevant, and supported by direct sourcing (a video of Dorian in which he espouses holocaust denial conspiracies). Can you help me understand why you reverted the change? Realspool32 (talk) 19:50, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Holocaust denial is not his profession, nor is it the reason he is notable or famous. The introductory paragraph should only mention these types of things. Otherwise it is giving undue weight to a particular aspect of the person's life, which could go against the policy of neutrality. ... discospinster talk 20:11, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Three points:
1) His nationality is also not his profession or a reason he's notable or famous, and yet it is included. This seems inconsistent.

2) Willing self-declared denial of the Holocaust in an otherwise famous figure is notable on its face. A lack of reference in the summary becomes its own violation of the neutrality policy.

3) The interview in question was given in the context of a discussion of his profession. Yates chose to address this opinion because it was notable within his professional community. This suggests it was already relevant and should be included in the summary.

I'd like to include this fact again. Thoughts?Realspool32 (talk) 23:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the subsection "First sentence" in the page that I linked. Holocaust denial is not notable on its face any more than other controversial views. Some individuals are known for it, such as those listed in Category:Holocaust deniers, but Dorian Yates is not known for this. It's mentioned in the "Personal life" section of his article and that is sufficient. ... discospinster talk 23:45, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Happy Tree Pals"

[edit]

Check this out. That's the same person being used as the only source for West Camp Friends.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 23:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TPA

[edit]

You probably want to revoke TPA here. Nahida 🌷 22:26, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. ... discospinster talk 22:27, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit explanation

[edit]

Why is this deletion explained with an m? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Red_light_camera&diff=1291566302&oldid=1291227636 71.167.15.17 (talk) 02:46, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand. --71.167.15.17 (talk) 22:23, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User: 97.118.176.69 block.

[edit]

Hello, recently you blocked User IP: 97.118.176.69. This user has apparently been bullied by User: FlighTime because his account had only been used to vandalism. User: FlighTime was saying things like "block this idiot". While I do not necessarily think this is wrong, I do think that unblocking hime for this bullying would greatly help him. He i s clearly mad about this, and has promised if unblocked not to vandalize. I know that the block is short, but I think unblocking him would make him less mad at User: FighTime. Again, I do not think FlighTime did wrong, but do think unblocking him would make him less mad, and help him to gain trust in the Wikipedia community. Thank you for your decision. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 00:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your request. Of course I'm not going to unblock an IP who has been harassing another user and being uncivil and disruptive on their own talk page. ... discospinster talk 02:30, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Block adjusted by Bbb23 - FlightTime (open channel) 00:31, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is he unblocked? ExplorerofSpace (talk) 00:35, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ExplorerofSpace: Sorry, you don't know how to check? And why He? are you sure? - FlightTime (open channel) 00:56, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for flooding your talk. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:57, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know it was a "he", just guessing based on how the person was responding. I do know how to check but at the time it was not loading. I see the edits are reverted and he no longer has access to his. talk page. Sorry about the confusion.

Oof, sorry

[edit]

I didn't realize my block stepped on your block at the Alwar district IP. Joyous! Noise! 03:13, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it happens. ... discospinster talk 03:15, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mammoth Mammoth band article

[edit]

Hi, just wanted to let you know about a blocked account MMammothBand that is requesting an unblock. They made an edit that was reverted but then subsequently restored word-for-word by Bridgehampton1970, the one you're currently having a edit-warring problem with. Not sure if it's too soon to go down the SPI route, but it sure has the signs of sock/meat puppetry... --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just discovered another blocked account, WKiCheckDesk also requesting an unblock. Both accounts admit to being band members. Maybe it's time for SPI? --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:43, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I agree that there needs to be a response to their editing. ... discospinster talk 00:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I filed a report: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bridgehampton1970. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 01:17, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Grant Cardone

[edit]

Heya disco. You create-protected Grant Cardone a few years back because people kept recreating a version that was too advertisement-like. Autopatrolled, experienced editor Horse Eye's Back has been working on Draft:Grant Cardone and thinks its ready for publication. AFC reviewer SafariScribe declined the draft for a reason that is pretty obviously mistaken, and SS has been AWOL on this matter despite being active elsewhere. Due to the decline, a request for unprotection at RFPP was rejected. I pinged you there, but it was quickly archived. As the protecting admin, would you consider unprotection? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:15, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note that SafariScribe has now responded, apparently they are baffled as to what could be wrong with their decline[[3]] but we should be able to make progress on that front. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:40, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
discospinster, this is a question about your admin activities not a social call... Please respond in a timely manner (I see that you are active) Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:21, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not the only one who can unprotect a page. ... discospinster talk 18:32, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're not but everyone else seems to be taking a passing the buck approach which has resulted in a veritable beurocratic pile-up and you're usually good at cutting through BS plus the OG admin here it seems. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:55, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK I have unprotected it. ... discospinster talk 19:59, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I think there are still some formal channels to go through as SafariScribe eventally made the page at Grant Cardone (businessman) which was then speedily deleted under G4 (which does not apply to it but the admin is standing by their speedy deletion). Hopefully this makes it all a bit easier to clean up. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 20:04, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPOV

[edit]

All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must follow a neutral point of view (NPOV), this includes depictions of territorial boundaries. 184.147.24.4 (talk) 18:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article on John Churchill (lawyer)

[edit]

This article confuses John Churchill (lawyer) with his nephew Sir John Churchill (judge), despite the warning on the latter's article "He should not be confused with his uncle John Churchill." Many of the facts in this article are therefore wrong. My main source is The Early Churchills, an English Family, author A.L. Rouse, Publisher Macmillan & Co. Ltd. For the date of death and place of burial, I can provide a photo of the tombstone. Rouse also gives the wrong date of death. Camtrin (talk) 00:48, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fascist Italy

[edit]

Hi. It seems you have spotted my recent edits. My goal is to use Fascist Italy as a belligerent in infoboxes. This usage had been used for many years in World War II battles involving Italy and its time to put it back. Thanks. PrimeNick (talk) 01:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) PrimeNick, please take the time to read WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. Patient Zerotalk 01:31, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Done reading it. But I got one question. Is the usage of the Kingdom of Italy in infoboxes is accepted through the use of consensus? If there's a general agreement that already been made to use it, I can abide it. Thanks. PrimeNick (talk)

June 11: Virtual NYC WikiWednesday

[edit]
June 11: WikiWednesday Salon (Virtual)

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our virtual WikiWednesday Salon. This month's WikiWednesday will be fully online and focused on Wikimedia global trends, neutral point of view, and the Wiki Loves Pride campaign for Pride Month. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome!

Meeting info:

All attendees at Wikimedia NYC events are subject to the Wikimedia NYC Code of Conduct and Photography Policy.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Hi. I think you've warned the wrong person. I have made good faith edits here. GNG22 (talk) 16:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trichloroethylene

[edit]

Hello, I've been researching this chemical for years and I know all mechanisms behind its health effects, reaction and usage. Trichloroethylene is a strong analgesic which is especially effective for neuralgia-type pain. Trichloroethylene has been mentioned as used as an analgesic for some types of headaches in the past.

So basically, pure trichloroethylene does not cause headaches and it's the opposite. The source in the article likely refers to industrial grade trichloroethylene which has impurities, mostly dichloroacetylene formed due to decomposition of trichloroethylene. Dichloroacetylene is a neurotoxin and it causes headaches. That's what I'm trying to tell. The source in the article is vague and needs clarification. Trichloroethylene (talk) 00:47, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to be a source for the addition of this content. ... discospinster talk 03:03, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious sock

[edit]

fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 01:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have blocked them both. ... discospinster talk 03:03, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
​They're back as an IP. 152.156.184.181 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) restores Arielito fuentes' last edit [9][10].
I have protected the page for a while. ... discospinster talk 16:58, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TPA

[edit]

Hi Discospinster, I think it might be worth revoking TPA here, see filter log. Thanks, Referentis (talk) 21:21, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK I have done that. ... discospinster talk 21:22, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About the protection level of Ponyo

[edit]

Hey Discospinster! Thank you for protecting this article. Given the history of abuse (see the protection log and my previous protection request), would you consider extending the semi-protection or implementing indefinite pending changes protection? I would prefer the latter as the Studio Ghibli area gets some good faith contributions from unregistered and newer editors. Let me know what you think. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:45, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The last protection was in 2023 so I don't know yet if there is grounds to go more than a week at the moment. ... discospinster talk 00:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, I forgot that pending changes protection has a different log! That would make the last protection in 2024 set to expire later this year. Isabelle Belato, courtesy ping. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:03, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I'm curious why the external links were removed? None of them linked to actual files and only provided databases of curated titles. Dcoop73 (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The external links section is meant to provide links to official sites and expert pages, otherwise there is a tendency for users to start adding excessive links. ... discospinster talk 17:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm Durban Tycoon. I've seen that you have experience in editing so I need your help. And I apologize for past mistakes about Morningside

[edit]
41.144.96.38 (talk) 22:21, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You also blocked my IP adress

[edit]
41.144.96.38 (talk) 22:23, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the Morningside wiki I just wanted to extend it. So what did I do wrong

[edit]
41.144.96.38 (talk) 22:24, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ISG. I have added in the report

[edit]

I have attached the report by the ISG. I can not link to the exact page but it is in the second PDF when you download it.

It states: ISG has uncovered numerous examples of Iraq’s disregard for UN sanctions and resolutions in an effort to improve its missile and UAV capabilities. These violations repeatedly breached UNSCR 687, 707, 715, 1051, 1284, 1441 and pursuant annexes and enabled Iraq to develop more robust delivery system programs. Also: Several former high-level Regime offi cials and scientists directly affi liated with Iraq’s military industries have indicated that Iraq intentionally withheld information from the UN regarding its delivery systems programs, to include research into delivery systems with design ranges well in excess of 150 km.

This pattern of activity occurred at all levels and indicates a widespread effort to protect certain activities and to deceive the international community. According to numerous sources, Iraq worked on several delivery system projects that were never declared to the UN, violating UNSCR 1441 DuelfersReport (talk) 00:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cyril Hazard

[edit]

FYI, news is circulating in astronomy circles (from reliable sources) that he sadly passed away in his sleep on the 14 June. I haven't spotted any news articles about this yet, so haven't touched the article as it's not yet verifiable, but as you've already seen others will be trying to add that info. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The COVID-19 Endemic Article

[edit]

I removed the part where there is no way to say COVID-19 is not an endemic, but other parts on the article say the CDC says it’s endemic. There are indeed ways to prove it is at least somewhat predictable, even if not fully endemic. You put it back and I think it should be removed because it is outdated. HelpfulBeagle (talk) 23:57, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have to explain in the edit summary why you are removing the content. ... discospinster talk 00:00, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't turn Wikipedia into propaganda machine

[edit]

You just undid my edit about the TB-2 use in India-Pakistan and asked me to open a talk. Somebody else has already done it. The source doesn't give any evidence and clearly is done by biased motivations. If you want to turn Wikipedia to a propaganda machine, that's okay. But there are many other alternatives nowadays and this will kill the declining reputation of this website. Wikibiryalanmakinesi (talk) 00:12, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The text clearly said that it was "according to Indian armed forces". This does not mean it's true, and the article does not claim that it's true. If there are other reliable sources that contradict that, you are free to add them. ... discospinster talk 00:40, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spoof account

[edit]

Your user page and talk page are being transcluded onto user:Discospinstr's pages. Meters (talk) 07:56, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind... now blocked along with another spoof account also faking your closures on AFDs Meters (talk) 08:07, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know. It's an ongoing thing. ... discospinster talk 16:23, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ISP - Edited

[edit]

Hello there!

Recently, for a school event, we, the Head Students at ISP changed somethings on our schools wikipedia page. However, we noticed that you changed it back to its original content. As in the edit log, we clearly labeled the change for a school event. If you were concerned that it was vandalism or that we weren’t going to change it back-well, we were. In the future please first message the editor to check that they haven’t done this for a reason.

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reply to this and we will answer them to our best ability.

Signed, ISP Head Students 1.9.50.109 (talk) 04:40, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Atlantis Entertainment production company.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Atlantis Entertainment production company.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 01:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]
Hey, Discospinster. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Wikibirthday!

[edit]
Hey, Discospinster. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Wiki-Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! drinks or coffee ~ ♪ 11:41, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
drinks or coffee ~ ♪ 11:41, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheraz Daya

[edit]

Hi, was this edit actually you? Just confirming, as this is an area with paid/sock editors. Suriname0 (talk) 18:07, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was not me. ... discospinster talk 21:08, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

extended protection of the article Reza Shah

[edit]

hi dear adminstrator i ask you to have the article of Reza shah, extended protected because it is subject of vandalism as you can see. please protect the article in order to avoid more vandalism from unregistered users.--Kianush20p (talk) 02:48, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Kianush20p. The proper place to request page protection is at WP:RPP. The people there may be able to help you. —tony 04:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

clue bot

[edit]

please block it and give my ip admin 75.174.79.113 (talk) 23:28, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]