User talk:Cristiano Tomás

Note: contents of this page are periodically archived by a bot. If there have been no recent posts here, that can result in no messages being displayed below. Older messages are still readable in the archives (below). New messages may be added here.

Santa Paula

I want to discuss the changes made on Santa Paula, California regarding the images in the montage. The image of Thomas Aquinas College is actually not highly visible in the city. In fact, it borders on unincorporated land. I don't want to publicize my sources, but if you want me to verify the opinions of City Hall I can. I suggest leaving the photo of the Train Depot and keeping the image of the orange groves as it represents the history of citrus and agriculture. Moyir90 (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moyir90: Thank you for the message! To be frank, the opinions of City Hall are inconsequential - that's not how Wikipedia works. Including the train depot because its locally relevant is perfectly valid (I can see it's used extensively in city imagery in different sources), but infobox montages are spaces to showcase the city or in some cases recognizable natural landmarks, but not non-descript agricultural land. Nearly every town in California has an "agricultural history", but you don't see garlic fields for Gilroy (the "Garlic Capital of the World"), Almond trees for Ripon (the "Almond Capital of the World") , or mushroom farms for Morgan Hill (the "Mushroom Capital of the World"), and so on. But the image of the orange groves is worth including in the body of the article, I agree with that; I could see it in the economy or geography section, for example. In regards to the church/college, the landmark is consequential enough to be used in tourist material and its certainly architecturally significant enough to merit inclusion in the montage. That being said, the imagery on Wikicommons for the city is certainly lacking. If you are a local and want to showcase more of the city, I suggest uploading more images of the landmarks and historic sites of the community, perhaps the Cole Art Center or downtown shops - I think that either of those would definitely merit inclusion in the montage and certainly in the article. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 18:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, sadly I don't have access to a proper camera at the moment or else I would find more landmarks to photograph. I had originally changed the images back in August as the Train Depot is more notable and recognizable than the college. In fact, the Train Depot is highlighted on the Chamber's website. I appreciate the tourism link, but that article was likely written by a bot and/or ai, as "Santa Paula Bakery" doesn't exist nor has it ever. The Faulkner Farm hasn't been open since c 2014. Harding Park has no open spaces for picnics either. There are more mistakes, but I digress.

The land and agriculture of Morgan Hill is shown on the montage, so I feel like the agriculture could be in a smaller image like the Train Depot is now. At the very least, to compromise, I think that Train Depot should be the larger image featured and Thomas Aquinas College is a "smaller" image, switching places with the Train Depot; at least until I can take more images of local landmarks. Moyir90 (talk) 19:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moyir90: Happy for you to rearrange the montage as you might see fit, including the college photo. Given the proportions, you might have to make use of the croptool or try to find a less vertical image of the college. In regards to morgan hill, you'll notice its a static montage (AKA not customizable template, but its all one image, so not a great example for either of our points to be honest). And don't be afraid to use your phone camera! I have uploaded thousands of images (such as File:Brousseau Hall 4716 (cropped).jpg or File:Pico-Boronda Adobe 4278.jpg), all captured with my iphone and they make due even if theyre not photographer-grade quality! Given your knowledge of the community, I encourage you to give it a try! Best, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 19:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great if you could rearrange it for me! I'm not that skilled of editor :) I will try taking some photos with my phone as well. Sadly, the college is an hour away from the town square (due to unforeseen landslides), so it'll be some months until I can make my way there. Am I able to use photos from online? Moyir90 (talk) 21:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Moyir90:, I am absolutely happy to help you however I can, be it with montage arrangement or anything else - please feel free to reach out! All the best my friend, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 13:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Cristiano Tomás. Thank you for your work on Casa de los Gobernadores. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you for the kind message, along with the review! Have a wonderful day yourself my friend! Best, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 13:39, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why was Harriet E. Riggs removed as a notable resident in LeDroit Park????

Doctor Harriet (Hattie) Riggs – A black educator from Calais, Maine, who taught at the M Street High School, lived at this location. Although Dr. Riggs earned her medical degree in 1892 from Howard University, she never practiced medicine. (418 T Street NW) She taught English at M St. High School and Dunbar High School, retiring in 1922. During her service of 40 years, she was head of the departments of English and History and a member of the board of examiners for the colored schools. In 1901 Dr. Riggs was graduated from Howard University Medical School, winning the alumni prize in medicine.

Of the 17 Notable Residents of LeDroit Park, on two are women...both very impressive...one being an heiress, and the other, in collaboration with her Doctor husband, did amazing things. But Harriet (Hattie) E Riggs was an Single, never married, African American woman whom earned a Medical degree in 1892....super impressive. Would she have been worthy of note were she an heiress or married?

2601:152:881:8010:88AD:6B75:D845:3453 (talk) 19:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If she doesn't have a wikipedia article already, she cannot be listed in a "notable people" section.Cristiano Tomás (talk) 19:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cristiano. Thank you for your note an explanation--Is that an absolute rule in Wikipedia? And, I was not trying to remove a reference....I was trying to add it back in and apparently failed. I was most certainly not trying to be disruptive. My apologies.

So, were a Wikipedia article did exist on her, then she could be included?

It just feels wrong that so many women in general, and African American women specifically, have been overlooked in our society. Certainly there are many more women in the history of LeDroit Park whom deserve recognition...the men could not have done it on there own.

Thank you.

Doug 2601:152:881:8010:5AC:6995:FE9F:6DDE (talk) 19:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is a guideline for any section listing notable people that the entries have their own article. If you feel like there aren't enough articles on a subjects you're passionate about (that meet the WP:Notability guidelines), then write them, with proper sources (see WP:Verifiability and WP:Citing sources). Wikipedia is what we make of it. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 19:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alameda, California

Thanks for removing the voter table at Alameda, California. My biggest issue with these tables are that they are inaccurate (the districts listed do not line up evenly with the city boundaries), and most are poorly sited and added by primarily by this sock. If you get pushback, please let me know, as it may need to go to an RFC. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677:, anytime! Will do my friend. If you need any support if this goes to RFC or a talk discussion, just let me know - happy to help however I can. Cheers, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 15:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 8, 2024

The Return of the LA Wiknic

Eat, drink, and bask in the glory of Los Angeles in early June at the 9th not-annual Wiknic!

Saturday, June 8 from 11:30 to 2:30 pm
Pan Pacific Park
7600 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles CA 90036
Get the details and RSVP here.
(It's a potluck. There's a wish list on the meetup page.)
Get the details and join WikiLA here.
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Baroque residences, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Oeiras and Beira Alta.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My edit on The Californias

What do you mean by evenly split on 8 largest cities (Atla and Baja)? 174.135.36.220 (talk) 18:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Plaza de California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plaza de California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plaza de California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon August 24

August 24: Not just an edit-a-thon, an edit-a-thon in Manhattan Beach.

Please join WikiLA at an edit-a-thon to improve and create articles related to marine life and the ocean in the Los Angeles area. Inspiration courtesy of the public library in Manhattan Beach, one of SoCal's most beautiful coastal communities.
Saturday, August 24 from 10:00 AM - 2:00 PM
Manhattan Beach Public Library, 1320 Highland Ave., Manhattan Beach 90266
Get the details and RSVP here
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups remove.your name, from this list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:55, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

West Adams

FWIW, my own work uniformly refers to West Adams as a neighborhood, not a district. By contrast, the editors here, apart from cited sources, vacillate in variously referencing West Adams as a district versus a neighborhood. That's a semantic inconsistency that I neither allow in my own linguistic endeavors nor do I suffer lightly when I encounter it at Wikipedia. I had hoped an enterprising editor would accordingly remedy the situation but it looks like no one's up to it. Guess the task is up to me. Kent Dominic·(talk) 18:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Portuguese colonial architecture in Saudi Arabia

A tag has been placed on Category:Portuguese colonial architecture in Saudi Arabia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Transportation in the Californias has been nominated for merging

Category:Transportation in the Californias has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gilroy Early College Academy

A few questions:

What are some recommended steps to improve this article?
What are some good places to find sources on the article's subject?
What information should I put in this article?

Thank you, 68.189.30.237 (talk) 18:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is pretty much built out. There isn't really anything else worth adding at this point. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 20:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archive problem

Hi, I was checking ClueBot's contributions and I noticed that something seems to have gone wrong with archive 16 of your talk page - it has been archiving it to deeper and deeper levels every week or so for a couple months, see:

The last one created on the 3rd of this month, edited today. I am unsure how you would go about requesting this to be fixed - though I did just remove what I believe was the cause of it Special:Diff/1250834580. I just thought I should inform you.
Note: I did not fix this current page, that template is not here anymore, it was archived (somehow) and caused recursive archiving - you are welcome to re-add it, but I don't want to do so myself as that seems a bit like messing with your talk page. Anyways that's all, thanks for you time. – 2804:F1...CB:8A56 (talk) 20:07, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah sorry, additional thing, the bot also created 'Master Detailed Indices' for each of the archives inside archives (didn't know it even did that), here's a link to the latest one. I am also not sure what should be done about those, perhaps just deletion as well? – 2804:F1...CB:8A56 (talk) 20:10, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Regarding my edit on Palos Verdes Estates

Hello,

Out of curiosity instead of making a table of election results for a jurisdiction, would typing a one sentence summary be acceptable? Feel free to take a look at the page of Palos Verdes Estates and let me know what you think, and if you don’t think it works, feel free to delete my edit.

Yours Truly, Truckonout

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Torre do Tombo National Archive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tome.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of History of the mapping of California

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from History of the mapping of California, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! PrinceTortoise (he/him) ^{(poke • inspect)} 01:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Calderon family of California has been nominated for renaming

Category:Calderon family of California has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 01:37, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of University House, San Luis Obispo

The article University House, San Luis Obispo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject of the article is not notable and has not received significant coverage. WP:SUSTAINED - "Brief bursts of news coverage may not sufficiently demonstrate notability." Most sources are also arguably noncompliant with WP:GNG re: independence of sources; one is from the university and two are from the campus newspaper.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Artwhitemaster (talk) 06:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LA Wildfire edit-a-thons January 26 and February 2

Upcoming edit-a-thons focused on the Los Angeles Wildfires

In response to the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires, WikiLA has organized three edit-a-thons to create or improve articles about the historically, culturally, and/or architecturally significant structures that were destroyed or damaged during the fires, and the organizations and entities that stepped up to help. Please join us.

Sunday, January 26, at the Ebell of Los Angeles in mid-Wilshire from 11:00–4:00. (Details and sign up here.)

Sunday, January 26, at the Live Oak Library in Arcadia from 11:00–4:00. (Details and sign up here.)

Sunday, February 2, at the Hammer Museum in Westwood from 11:00–4:00. (Details and sign up here.)

To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

JSFarman (talk) 19:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Tarlby

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Teahouse § Question about what should be added to certain articles. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 03:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Portuguese Halls in California

is new

69.181.17.113 (talk) 03:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jalisco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aqueduct.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:ClueBot III/Detailed Indices/User talk:Cristiano Tomás/Archive 16/Archives/ 1/Archives/ 1/Archives/ 1/Archives/ 1/Archives/ 1/Archives/ 1/Archives/ 1/Archives/ 1/Archives/ 1/Archives/ 1/Archives/ 1/Archives/ 1

Hello, Cristiano Tomás,

I'd like to suggest you delete your automatic archiving bot settings as it is really running amok creating blank User talk archive pages for you. I could delete them all or you could go through Wikipedia:Database reports/Bizarrely subnested userpages, search for your Username and tag all 36 of these blank archive pages for speedy deletion, CSD U1. But first remove the Cluebot instructions at the top of this page or it will keep creating them. It's really easy to archive your own User talk page messages manually and it doesn't run into these problems. Just let me know what you want to do. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: thank you so much for your message. I'll be honest, I have no idea how the archive system works. A fellow editor and friend set it up on my talk a good 8/9 years ago and I have since just coasted on by. If you could help me disable it, that would be greatly appreciated. I don't need any special archiving system, I am totally fine with my talk page growing old and long. Can you assist me in remedying this? Cristiano Tomás (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Pedro I of Brazil. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 18:15, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DrKay. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help towards making the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:06, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican-American middle class

I deprodded Mexican-American middle class because it would be controversial and arguably passes significant coverage. See my edit summary for more details. Bearian (talk) 16:16, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

... for creating so many new public art entries! Like ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:23, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer:, thank you for your kind message :) much appreciated. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 18:39, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Caesar DePaço for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caesar DePaço is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caesar DePaço until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:14, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Potential conflict of interest in regards to Caesar DePaço and related topics

Hi Cristiano Tomás, do you have a conflict of interest when it comes to Caesar DePaço and related topics? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:16, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Horse Eye's Back:, appreciate you reaching out. I did indeed. He was someone I knew through my social circle in Portugal and stupidly thought during my early college years that making an article on a public figure I knew would be cool. I was never paid - just young, foolish, and even cocky. Once his page began to be edited with the controversial topics, I immediately stopped editing it and never sought to overturn the edits which painted DePaco in bad light; and I have since not had any relation/contact with him for about 10 years. I would like to recuse myself from any discussions on his or related pages and their future. I have been on Wikipedia for nearly 15 years and done thousands of edits on history, architecture, etc. and would hate for this foolish act of my 18 year old self to hinder my ability to continue editing on Wikipedia, but I suppose even the things from 10 years ago can catch up to you. If you have any other questions for me, I am an open book. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 18:29, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that context, I have no other questions and your response is one of the best I've ever gotten to that question. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:45, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure Ron Linden is notable

Hello, I wanted to reach out and let you know I removed the notability template on Ron Linden. I'm pretty sure he's notable, there have been multiple reviews written on his work by respected critics in solid publications like the LA Times, ArtNews, etc. (these are currently not in the article, but do exist). So I think he meets GNG.The article is in bad shape overall, so I understand why you had tagged it. Nice meeting you here, and happy editing! Netherzone (talk) 04:12, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Former legislatures of Mexico

A tag has been placed on Category:Former legislatures of Mexico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:55, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Cristiano Tomás. Thank you for your work on Diputación de Alta California. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 02:01, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Cristiano Tomás. Thank you for your work on Statue of Lucha Reyes. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 02:01, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you so much for both of your kind messages, you are very kind. Have a wonderful day to you as well :) Cristiano Tomás (talk) 13:27, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Online slots: bets and payouts

Hi Cristiano, I hope you're doing well. I wanted to alert you to the fact that this link on your user page, for some strange reason, is redirecting to an Indonesian bookmaking website. I tried it in a couple different browsers. Reminds me that when I was very young I was briefly apprenticed to a bookbinder. I used to relish the shocked expression on old ladies' faces when I told them I was a bookmaker.;-) Carlstak (talk) 17:03, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Carlstak: It's been a while, hope you are doing well too! Thank you for letting me know about the broken link, I would have never noticed. Much appreciated! Best, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 13:27, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sutter County, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Live Oak, California.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits by TheHistorianEditor

Come on. Let me make the edit. All I am doing is adding information for this page of California I never denied the genocide. I was just adding information to the page, and fixing the header. I even said that the natives were displaced and depopulated. TheHistorianEditor (talk) 14:16, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheHistorianEditor: You are ignoring the warnings/advice of more seasoned editors. You are purposefully obfuscating reference to the Californian genocide in the lead by simply calling it displacement and depopulation, and quite frankly doing so in multiple places with poor writing. Your "added information" adds no value to these articles and actually hurts them with your poor writing and obfuscation. And this is Wikipedia, not a playground; there is no "come on let me do this", what kind of argument is that? lol. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 14:32, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop insulting my writing. Everyone makes mistakes. And I try to add detail and want to fix information. I am a skilled historian. I want the page to be as unbiased and fair as possible. You should not hurt other editors by constantly reverting their edits. TheHistorianEditor (talk) 14:44, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uruguay Oriental

I am not flat out wrong as you say. The translation is wrong! It is however accepted in some places. Which is true but silly! Gerard von Hebel (talk) 16:08, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hebel: You are indeed flat out wrong, the translation "Republic East of the Uruguay" is both ridiculous in its structure and also not used at all - "eastern" would be better than the garble you propose. But the fact is that Oriental means "eastern" and is widely accepted. Case closed. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]