User talk:WhoIsCentreLeft

Welcome!

Hello, WhoIsCentreLeft!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Doug Weller talk 11:40, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Front for Victory (Bolivia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agrarian revolution. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tags

Hi, at 2025 Turkish protests you added tags without putting anything on the talk page. Per WP:DRIVEBY, it's usually best practice to put something on the talk page about it so people can solve the issues (people can remove the tags freely since this wasn't done), otherwise big garish tags usually stay on the page as no-one's minded to fix them. Or better, just WP:FIXIT yourself, as the issues seem minor Kowal2701 (talk) 15:37, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! Thank you for helping me. Im fairly new to Wikipedia and make lots of mistakes. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:02, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I still make loads! Kowal2701 (talk) 14:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties section and infobox at 2025 Turkish protests

The casualties section at 2025 Turkish protests keeps disappearing. Please read MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE:

The purpose of an infobox is to summarize, but not supplant, the key facts that appear in an article. Barring the specific exceptions listed below, an article should remain complete with its infobox ignored.

Also see Help:Infobox:

What should an infobox contain?

...

• Already cited elsewhere in the article. Infoboxes, like the introduction to the article, should primarily contain material that is expanded on and supported by citations to reliable sources elsewhere in the article. However, if necessary (e.g., because the article is currently incomplete), it is possible to include footnotes in infoboxes.

It is not a problem but rather good that the section just repeats information from infobox. 216.58.25.209 (talk) 02:20, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 11:31, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On the second thought, i still think that Arrests section (formerly Casualties section) should be removed. The number of arrests is already covered in the 24 March section (in much more detail). WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 11:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topic alert

You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally, editors must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Burrobert (talk) 11:20, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation: Joseph Zieler (April 18)

There's not any in-depth coverage about him by reliable sources outside the murders and his A Wire of Hope profile is not a reliable source nor is listserve or Thought Cataloge so should not be used. You might consider an article about the murders rather than him. S0091 (talk) 21:15, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I did update the infofox, mimicking Murders of Abigail Williams and Liberty German using the event template. Since the article is not about him, but the victims, I don't think the mugshot belongs in the infobox so moved it down to the Trial section. I could also see it in the Arrest section but will leave it up to you. Since I am the one who made the suggestion to turn into an article about the murders, I will leave it another reviewer. S0091 (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:56, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Murders of Robin Cornell and Lisa Story has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Murders of Robin Cornell and Lisa Story. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 19:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation: Murders of Robin Cornell and Lisa Story

Unnecessary mentioning of things such as the mention of his profile in A Wire of Hope, or that Robin Cornell loved playing outdoors and skipping. Make sure the information all helps describe the murder and identifying the people affected by it, rather than going off-topic about things irrelevant to it. Setergh (talk) 18:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JCS – Criminal Psychology has been accepted

JCS – Criminal Psychology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zzz plant (talk) 00:26, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2014 Florida State University shooting has been accepted

2014 Florida State University shooting, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hi. Before contributing further to AfD I reccomend reviewing the AfD guidelines as well as WP:BEFORE as a large amount of your AfD noms are being kept. Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 18:40, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Kuykendall Stadium has been accepted

David Kuykendall Stadium, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 00:39, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Federal Disaster Response Agency for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Federal Disaster Response Agency is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal Disaster Response Agency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Rhain ☔ (he/him) 09:45, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Draft:Tyler Edmonds

Hello WhoIsCentreLeft! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Tyler Edmonds, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news/2010/dec/01/rush-to-judgment-trying-kids-as-adults/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Tyler Edmonds and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Tyler Edmonds, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Tyler Edmonds. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Tyler Edmonds with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Tyler Edmonds saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:54, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What?? I just started writing this draft and was preparing to rewrite this text in the coming days. This is completely unnecessary WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright material is not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia, not even in sandboxes or drafts. Sorry. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:37, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, there is not that much copyrighted material anyway, just a few sentences and quotes mixed in with false positives from copyvio. This shouldn't have happened. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs and article deletion

Hello, WhoIsCentreLeft,

First, I have never seen a productive, long-standing editor on the project have a statement like I also love deleting stuff. on their User space. Most constructive editors here seek to improve articles, not delete them. Deletion shouldn't be your goal on Wikipedia if you want to invest in this project for the longterm. We are building an encyclopedia, article by article.

Secondly, for every article you nominate for an AFD deletion discussion, you MUST do a thorough WP:BEFORE which means reviewing sources that exist in the article and looking for better sources elsewhere that can help establish a subject's notability. If you should decide to go to AFD, you should give a well-throughout deletion nomination statement that has full sentences, not just acronyms and abbreviations. You are a new editor and ordinarily I'd advise you against participating in AFDs at all for your first few months as an editor but you have already started nominating articles so instead I'll just urge you to do a better job at it. Again, we only seek to delete promotional articles and vandalism, for articles that are just not adequately sourced yet or not well-written it is better to seek to improve them, not send them to the junk heap. If an article has potential, your time as an editor is better spent improving an article than seeking to delete it. If you don't think you have the skills yet as an editor to do this, well, that's something that we all work on improving over time.

If you have questions about Wikipedia's approach toward page deletion, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice! I actually do a lot of WP:BEFORE before nominating articles for deletion, but i have hard time finding sources, so i assume that the article is not notable. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 09:12, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]