User talk:Helper201

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Note - I briefly set up the account User:Helper201V2 when I was having trouble logging into this account. That account only ever engaged in talk about my account and never made any edits. I did not make any edits to any pages with it and will not use it to make any edits unless otherwise stated. This is the one and only account I use.

Welcome!

Hello, Helper201! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:17, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Pirate Party UK

[edit]

Hello. The accounts submitted to the EC actually have this membership figure on them. There used to be a citation on the page showing this but it has since been removed - apparently the citation isn't open to the general public yet, but it should be shortly (it's actually over-due but the snap general election has slowed down the electoral commission some what). It's a bit of a waste of time to edit the graph only to change it back in a week or two - especially when I know the information to be valid.

No body

[edit]

The mention of the body does not say that she is dead. But it does connect to her late father’s wish to give her a proper Christian burial. If you are willing to accept that, pls undo previous edit. If not, pls mention in the Talk.

Thank you dear for updating Awami league page back to original

[edit]

Dear, I have noticed that you edited Awami League page back to original one and I'm delighted that you have done that. Unfortunately, users like Vif12vf|,Nzs9|, and ShrewMoon| take down good edits. I strongly advice you to monitor, Awami League page. It is being vandalized by users that are putting on false information and arguing about topics that they do not understand.2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:5A4:16B3:2839:64DB (talk) 18:47 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop Nzs9 from editing

[edit]

Nzs9|, is keeping on editing on Awami league page. He does it and then even has it undone. I would advice to monitor him and report him so he gets a ban from editing on Awami league page.2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:5A4:16B3:2839:64DB (talk) 14:27 20 March 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:A75B:7100:D4B6:874C:1C1F:7A6 (talk)

Political Party membership number indicator

[edit]

Hey, consensus was recently reached under the Reform UK page on whether the Increase/Decrease indicators should be used on the membership number for the corresponding party.

This is therefore the standard format across UK political party pages, please let me know if I'm wrong or if you would like to discuss it further. Finlayy (talk) 22:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Finlayy Wikipedia-wide consensus across various Wikipedia pages is not done via one article's talk page. Helper201 (talk) 18:59, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:October 2025 in Wales

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:October 2025 in Wales indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:12, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your Party Colour

[edit]

Oooh Kay. So why don't you revert the change to the module then? Or at least take it up with @Chessrat? And remove it from other articles like Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election and Leadership approval opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election. Or would that be too much trouble? Much easier to keep reverting other people's contributions than to make positive ones of your own. Oh, by the way, you forgot to remove the colour from the Councillors in the infobox. Please be consistent even if you find it difficult to be thorough. ~2025-32508-17 (talk) 17:54, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought of something else. Where, exactly, does one cite a "reliable source" for a party colour? ~2025-32508-17 (talk) 18:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chessrat, we should remove the colour for Your Party (UK) from Module:Political party/Y until there is a reliable third-party source that we can use to cite its official colour. Helper201 (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]