User talk:Versions111

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Versions111! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 15:03, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tikiraqtujuq moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Tikiraqtujuq. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma (talk) 10:25, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay Versions111 (talk) 11:39, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kasinimnikwanapikak Lake moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Kasinimnikwanapikak Lake. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma (talk) 10:26, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Big Ass Lake. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 12:55, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok sorry Versions111 (talk) 12:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Big Ass Lake, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:45, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Arcrev1. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Big Ass Lake—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arcrev1 (talk) 10:56, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what can i do to make it more constructive Versions111 (talk) 11:03, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your spirited contributions to Big Ass Lake. I took the liberty of cleaning it up - feel free to ask me any questions about editing on Wikipedia. OceanLoop (talk) 04:28, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, to answer your question in the edit summary, adding footnotes is fully explained at WP:EXPLNOTE. I've taken the liberty of fixing it for you, using {{efn}} and {{notes}}. If you have any other questions, I'm also around if you need help! ~ Matthewrb Let's connect · Here to help 06:38, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

[edit]

If you have multiple accounts (Versions222 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), etc.), you should declare them to prevent accusations of sockpuppetry. Also, congratulations on creating your first article! Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 01:59, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what do i do, delete the account? i dont know how Versions111 (talk) 09:01, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You just list all of them here. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 13:26, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
where? Versions111 (talk) 11:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Right here or in your userpage. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 11:45, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do i put
== Accounts ==
Versions222
in my user page? Versions111 (talk) 11:47, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Something like that. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 11:48, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm done Versions111 (talk) 11:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Ass Lake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rare. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did with this edit to Big Ass Lake. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 08:37, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it is already cited Versions111 (talk) 09:13, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]

Hello, I'm Arcrev1. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Big Ass Lake, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Arcrev1 (talk) 03:05, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Russian dictators for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Russian dictators is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Russian dictators until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Laura240406 (talk) 14:48, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Lake moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Gold Lake, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 01:58, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gold Lake (September 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Versions111! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:56, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the section on stargazing, without a third party source that specifically names Big Ass Lake as a notable or popular spot for this activity, this is just original synthesis Mfield (Oi!) 05:40, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Versions111! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 23:44, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Nomination for discussion of Template:Despite its name

[edit]

Template:Despite its name has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Polomo (talk) 23:51, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Silesia-geo-stub has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Template:Silesia-geo-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 12:55, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sorbian-culture-stub has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Template:Sorbian-culture-stub has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the stub template guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the template's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 14:27, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]