User talk:Materialscientist

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, cite your references in the article you edited; there is no use bringing them here.
I turned off most notifications in my preferences, and therefore can't see pings, sorry.
New messages go at the bottom.

Thoughts on an ANI section

You might be able to help us out here. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If U don't mind…

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for all your help combatting that spammer just now. Gommeh 🎮 15:46, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Symbolic Depiction of Abbas ibn Ali in Removed Artwork

I’d like to respectfully clarify the rationale behind the faceless depiction of Abbas ibn Ali in the removed artwork. The image was intentionally designed without eyes or detailed facial features to align with Shia Islamic visual ethics, which generally discourage fully illustrating the faces of sacred figures—especially members of the Ahl al-Bayt. The artist, Muntadher Saleh (a Shia polymath and visual artist), follows this tradition, using symbolism over realism. The absence of facial details is not a flaw but a deliberate choice to reflect spiritual transcendence, inviting viewers to connect with the divine virtues Abbas represents—loyalty, courage, and sacrifice—rather than his physical traits. This style is commonly used in respectful religious art within Shia communities. It avoids anthropomorphizing revered figures while still honoring their memory. In this context, the facelessness is what adds reverence, not ambiguity. Therefore, I kindly suggest that the image be reconsidered for inclusion. It is culturally and religiously appropriate, and it adds a valuable visual and interpretive dimension to the article, especially from the Shia perspective. Thank you for your consideration. 004bvan (talk) 06:03, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page Review

Draft:Farhan Ul Arshad Zona2 (talk) 08:30, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Problem IP

Coming from this, they restored their unsourced version and added similar in other articles. I've reverted one of their edits, POV-change of source quote [1]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:02, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WP:Requests for page protection/Decrease§ Angry Birds Fight!

You are invited to join the discussion at WP:Requests for page protection/Decrease§ Angry Birds Fight!. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt you intended to indef template protect here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:51, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Akshay Nanavati

I reverted a no doubt COI vandalism attempt to your last edit. The IP is from AZ, so again likely it's vengeful wife. 2A00:F3C:1234:0:1D92:BDDE:C120:8258 (talk) 04:13, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FBG Duck protection

Thanks for protecting the FBG Duck page, if you could also protect the talk page (is that possible or wanted?) because it is now getting the same treatment as the original page. It is less critical I suppose. Cheers, have a good week. Moritoriko (talk) 07:22, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Moritoriko (talk) 08:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't read

Read: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/30035979

The US M9A1 rocket launcher is an example of the weapon type commonly known as the 'B'azooka'. The name was taken from a homemade musical instrument played by American comedian Bob Burns, which an experimental model of the launcher was said to resemble. The first 'B'azooka' to be adopted by the US Army was the M1, which entered service in 1942. The M9A1 is a later development with a two piece tube that permitted disassembly for ease of transportation. In common with German rocket-propelled anti-tank munitions, the 'Bazooka' employed hollow-charge warheads. Hollow charge munitions rely upon the generation of a jet of molten metal to penetrate their target. Their performance is therefore unaffected by range or velocity and they can be relatively light in weight. The M9A1 had a maximum range of 640m, and its rocket propelled munition could penetrate 120mm of armour.

It is NOT about instrument, it is NIT about colloquial "bazooka" as any handheld rocket launcher neither. 94.246.147.217 (talk) 17:09, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia uses its own conventions. See MOS:CAPS. Materialscientist (talk) 17:13, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So why is there Challenger tank and not "challenger"? And any and evey other capitalized weapon name, including the German improved Bazooka copy Panzerschreck? 94.246.147.217 (talk) 17:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because those are particular models rather than a collective term. Hence bazooka, but M20 Super Bazooka. Materialscientist (talk) 17:19, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Bazooka is the M1 and the M9A1 (improved Bazooka), the Super Bazooka is M20 (very different model, incompatible). Just like I linked you, I even quoted for you, still still didn't read. 94.246.147.217 (talk)

Here you have another example: https://www.pacificwarmuseum.org/visit/exhibits/artifacts/m9a1-bazooka 94.246.147.217 (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User you may want to peek at...

Might make sense to look at Xada23 in the CU context of Liamalexander444 (see Talk:Poodle). Thanks and let me know if there's an SPI or if I should handle it different in future. Skynxnex (talk) 20:59, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Sopochil (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is also related and has created a draft page (although it has no content) Traumnovelle (talk) 22:35, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated Vandalism

Dear user @Materialscientist, please have a look at the edit history of page named Anangpur, unlogged ip addresses are again and again doing unconstructive changes there, so i think this page must be locked for some time. Thank you HistorianAlferedo (talk) 17:51, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Charles Eymundson

You reverted my changes for the post Charles Eymundson. I am his granddaughter and have significant information and insight about this gentleman. I donated the families photos that were taken during his lifetime and my father's lifetime to the Provincial Archives of Alberta. These photos were not necessarily taken by Charles Eymundson and he was not "known" for photography as they were not released until 2012, after my father Romeo passed away. Charles worked for the Eau Claire lumber Company,(per Charles), but Charles, nor the PAA State that he was a lumberjack. I have not found any documentation to support this, however, in and it is not cited correctly on Wikepedia. Who ever uploaded the original, made assumptions. If you can cite the "lumberjack" job please and the citation to the article. If you read the biographical sketch and custodial history on the Provincial Archives of Alberta, that I wrote, you will understand that I did, cite the PAA Hermis. I would appreciate you re-posting the changes I made. If you require more information, please feel free to engage in a conversation with me. Skalar1872 (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle

Are you having much trouble with Huggle? You appear to use Huggle extensively. I am having a fair number of issues with it. I left a message on wt:Huggle/Feedback#When will 3.4.14 be released?, but never got a response from the coders. Others have left similar messages. Any suggestions? Cheers Adakiko (talk) 21:10, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Date vandalism

Hi, can you please consider blocking user 213.7.203.250 (talk · contribs) as they are pesistently changing referenced dates to false dates as shown here diff which contradicts the referenced date. They have ignored a final warning, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:04, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

103.165.73.96

103.165.73.96 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)

Can you proxy block this IP address, similar to your block of 103.167.213.100 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Thanks. 71.59.186.230 (talk) 05:42, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Looks like Lofty abyss did it. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 06:44, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SundostundBots

For obvious reasons, I believe that the creation of SundostundBots (talk · contribs) was directly inspired by my username, and I don't like that at all. I'm never happy when someone mocks me, especially when it comes to my username, status and work here. That particularly applies to newly-created accounts, obviously used for disruptive editing only. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 20:34, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Hello, Materialscientist. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Thanks
Daniel (talk) 22:16, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi, hope its okay to DM for this but 62.4.36.182 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is back after their block expired. Pelmeen10 (talk) 18:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Boron nitride

Boron nitride has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:01, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pharaoh

Hi, can you please unprotect the page as it's no longer necessary? Thanks, cheers. Thepharoah17 (talk) 19:39, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the source for your edit on TBVC (Tuberculosis verrucous cutis)rru

Septiafni, Kiki; Pamudji, Raden; Rusmawardiana, R; Argentina, Fifa. Tuberculosis Verrucous Cutis Mimicking Chromoblastomycosis: a Case Report and Diagnostic Challenges. International Journal of Mycobacteriology 11(2):p 208-210, Apr–Jun 2022. | DOI: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_57_22

TBVC is caused by Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. It is the one of the rarest forms of skin infection caused by M. tuberculosis.

There are few case reports of the causative organism being M. avium complex or other species in the same genus. I prefer not to include them as causative organism of TBVC, since it's a rare cause for a rare disease. In clinical practice, diagnosis of TBVC requires ruling out so many other conditions. 117.193.149.241 (talk) 06:44, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]