User talk:Vankal

This is Vankal's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Vankal/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 21:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vankal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 21:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm Shhhnotsoloud. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hmar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:31, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vanlallawmzuala Varte (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vanlallawmzuala Varte and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Caleb Stanford (talk) 21:16, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hiya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with anything that you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). See the conflict of interest guideline (or the plain and simple version) for more information. In short—

Please avoid editing or creating articles about anything you have a COI with; instead, propose changes using the Edit Request Wizard or submit drafts through Wikipedia:Articles for creation, and be sure to disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI).

Also, if you're being paid for your edits here, in addition to what's mentioned above, you are also required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use to disclose this your employer/client and affiliation—see Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

If you think I made a mistake and you don't actually have a COI, or if you have any questions about this or editing Wikipedia in general, please let me know! Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 19:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Meriam L. Hrangchal. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:44, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, Draft:Ricky Lalremsanga, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:22, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lallukhum Fimate moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lallukhum Fimate. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:27, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meriam L. Hrangchal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Meriam L. Hrangchal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meriam L. Hrangchal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meriam L. Hrangchal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:55, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lalvarmoi Hmar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lalvarmoi Hmar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:32, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Langthasa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Daniel Langthasa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Thilsebatti (talk) 12:17, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Langthasa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Langthasa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Langthasa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 12:50, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Vankal. Thank you for your work on Boro Muolkoi. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please add the population along with a ref from the official indian census site

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:16, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of India Book of Records for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article India Book of Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India Book of Records (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 08:20, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky Lalremsanga moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ricky Lalremsanga. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:08, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vanlal Tluonga Bapui moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vanlal Tluonga Bapui. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because many of the sources in the article are either unreliable or do not establish notability sufficiently; I believe there is a strong chance the author could be notable, but these sources do not establish it sufficiently. It also suffers from ref bombing. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 19:33, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vanlal Tluonga Bapui (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Significa liberdade were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vanlal Tluonga Bapui and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:36, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade Thank you for taking the time to review my draft. I am a new Wikipedian and still learning about the guidelines and best practices. I understand your concern regarding a possible conflict of interest. My intention is only to create a neutral and informative article based on reliable sources, not to promote.

I will carefully go through the COI and neutrality guidelines to improve the draft. If you have any advice or suggestions for a new editor like me, I would be very grateful.

Thank you again for your guidance and patience. Vankal (talk) 20:08, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you state your connection to the subject? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade Thank you for asking about my connection to the subject. I am from the same community and I have written this draft as part of my effort to preserve and document the contributions of important figures of the Hmar people. Vanlal Tluonga Bapui is a significant person for our community—he was one of the earliest educated individuals from Boro Muolkoi Village, a respected teacher, church leader, and an important contributor to Hmar literature and Bible translation.

I do not have any financial interest, but I do have cultural and historical interest as a member of the Hmar community. My intention is to ensure that his life and works are recorded in a neutral, well-sourced way for future readers. If there are areas where I need to improve neutrality or sourcing, I would be very grateful for your guidance. Vankal (talk) 21:41, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification, Vankal! As you continue editing, I recommend reading Wikipedia's guide to writing your first article if you haven't already. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:49, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade I am from the same community, and I wanted to create this article because Vanlal Tluonga Bapui is a very important person for the Hmar people. He was among the earliest educated individuals from Boro Muolkoi Village and went on to become a respected teacher, church leader, and social worker. He also played a leading role in Hmar literature, writing dictionaries, grammar books, and historical works, and contributed to Bible translation projects. Because of his lifelong service, he was recognized with a literary pension by the Government of Assam and an honorary doctorate from a Christian university.

For the Hmar tribe, his contributions in education, language preservation, theology, and community development make him one of the most significant figures of recent generations. My interest is cultural and historical, not financial, and my goal is only to present his life and works in a well-sourced and neutral way for the benefit of readers. Vankal (talk) 21:46, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]