User talk:Songuitar333

Welcome!

[edit]
Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Songuitar333! Thank you for your contributions. I am I dream of horses and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Geoff Levin) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Geoff Levin, Songuitar333!

Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'm moving this to Draft:Geoff Levin. Edit the draft until you are finished, with reliable sources. Add [{tnull

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.

Learn more about page curation. to the top when you're done.}}

Songuitar333, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Songuitar333! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

The article Mayuka Thaïs has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 22:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mayuka Thaïs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 22:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User talk:Comatmebro, Thank you for your kind help with this matter. I appreciate your help very much. I am still new to wikipedia but in good faith I have been helping numerous pages and learning as I go there are many questions. Since Mayuka Thaïs has been approved as an article for a while now. Can this warning be deleted from my user_talk page? I do not know if this is allowed but I wanted to ask. I look forward to your reply. Kind regards, Songuitar333 (talk) 18:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoff Levin (January 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources are simply his own profiles, announcements, listings and similar with his website being repeated several times; what this specifically needs is major independent news and only that.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 20:23, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey saw your edits

[edit]

Saw your admittance about a mistake you made at a page edit summary. You can send me the actual spelling and I can help move it to the appropriate page. It don't need to be deleted, articles can be renamed in Wikipedia Mahveotm (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Her name is Kunimi Andrea but I miss-spelled it as Kunim Andrea. I re-created the page but I don't want to have two pages on wiki for her. This is the correct page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunimi_Andrea this is the incorrect page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunim_Andrea Thank you for your help!! Songuitar333 (talk) 22:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC) [reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Songuitar333, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Bobbie Moline-Kramer have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Celestial Navigations has been accepted

[edit]
Celestial Navigations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! This makes me so happy!! Songuitar333 (talk) 04:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Songuitar333. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Dashy (message me) (my contribs) 07:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]
I am creating an article on Debbie Lawler but don't know how tp upload this image that is already in Wikimedia Commons. https://artfulliving.com/6-greatest-daredevils/
After you create the article, you can follow the instructions in Help:Pictures; you basically link to the image by adding something like [[File:Example.jpg]]. -- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 09:07, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bobbie Moline-Kramer (April 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoff Levin (April 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
What you need are in-depth sources about Levin, from independent, reliable sources. The vast majority of this article is drawn from non-independent sources, and the rest are not in-depth sourcing.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teri Suzanne (April 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I'm not seeing general notability here. You have two newspaper articles about her, which doesn't seem enough for WP:SIGCOV. Editors could disagree but I'd need to see heavier coverage or a better claim of notability per WP:NACTOR to accept this draft.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chris Troutman (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Teri Suzanne has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Teri Suzanne. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Curb Safe Charmer , The article was NOT initiated by the author of the article. Interviews by the Japan Times are initiated 6 months in advance. How I know this is because I personally have lived in Japan and do know how the system there works. You HAVE to be notable, highly respected, and have high profile and you have to be asked. My article for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celestial_Navigations was approved just recently. They don't have a lot of articles on them but they do have history just like Teri Suzanne. I am disappointed that you think just anyone can ask to be written up about especially for The Japan Times. The Japan Times has a very long history. I will also keep adding to this draft. I found a few more articles today that are reliable sources. Also to add to this it is written in pink that if declined to "Find sources by clicking the following: "Teri Suzanne" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference." So I did exactly all of this to improve this article and found more reliable sources. Please respond in how I can keep improving this article. Kind regards. Songuitar333 (talk) 01:40, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teri Suzanne (June 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Waggie was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Since the last review, the added sources are pretty much all interviews, blogs, Google Books links, Amazon links, and Youtube links, none of which help establish notability or are actually reliable sources. I think she's close, but I would actually recommend trimming the content to only content supported by clearly reliable, secondary (journalistic) sources. In short, adding more problematically sourced content on top of problematically sourced won't help.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Waggie (talk) 16:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind message :) Will go in and fix this article. Songuitar333 (talk) 18:17, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Billy Hawn

[edit]

Hello, Songuitar333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Billy Hawn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 15:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Global March for Elephants & Rhinos, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Songuitar333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Global March for Elephants & Rhinos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 13:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bobbie Moline-Kramer has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bobbie Moline-Kramer. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 17:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Bobbie Moline-Kramer has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bobbie Moline-Kramer. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:50, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help it means & helps a lot to understand how to be a better wiki supporter. I'm really trying and learning as I go :) Curb Safe Charmer!! Songuitar333 (talk) 01:06, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bobbie Moline-Kramer has been accepted

[edit]
Bobbie Moline-Kramer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 00:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Teri Suzanne has been accepted

[edit]
Teri Suzanne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atsme📞📧 03:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Songuitar333. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoff Levin (January 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
To echo the previous reviewers, there's just not a lot here from independent sources that discuss Levin. Most of them are one-sentence mentions of him being a composer/musician/etc. The only in-depth material is from PRIMARY sources such as the websites of the films he's worked on. In order to demonstrate notability, please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 22:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoff Levin (November 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Still lacking sources that focus on Levin. Recent additions were only about Jerry Garcia where Levin's name was a passing mention
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 18:10, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Songuitar333. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Geoff Levin has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Geoff Levin. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 04:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoff Levin has been accepted

[edit]
Geoff Levin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoshio Ikezaki (July 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Ikezaki has had more than 50 solo exhibits and 90 group exhibits in countless museums and galleries (my emphasis), citing a source that doesn't say these are countless, but that instead simply refrains from providing a count. Please remove such puffery. In this draft, the long list of exhibitions includes plenty of "Yoshio Ikezaki Painting Exhibit" and the like: what was the actual title, provide a source for the exhibition that's independent of Ikezaki, and put the exhibitions (and other lists) into oldest-at-the-top, newest-at-the-bottom order. Remove most group exhibitions as too trivial. Remove any list of interviews.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 21:07, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mayuka Thaïs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help!! Songuitar333 (talk) 01:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Songuitar333 (talk) 01:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping me improve this article. I fixed what I was asked to fix. If there are more that needs to be fixed, please let me know.

AfC notification: Draft:Yoshio Ikezaki has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yoshio Ikezaki. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 23:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I decided to delete the exhibition list as it is redundant when it does talk about his exhibitions in his bio section. Thank you for the help! Do you see anything else that needs to be included for this page to be published? Songuitar333 (talk) 01:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoshio Ikezaki has been accepted

[edit]
Yoshio Ikezaki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 04:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your help!! I appreciate it ;) Songuitar333 (talk) 06:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Songuitar333. Thank you for your work on Yoshio Ikezaki. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article on a Japanese-American artist.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 18:04, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Songuitar333 (talk) 01:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC) Thank you for your comment and review :)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you recently removed content from Talk:Mayuka Thaïs without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Theroadislong (talk) 08:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]