User talk:SomeAnotherCastaway

Welcome!

Hi SomeAnotherCastaway! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Masters of the Universe (2026 film) did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! BOVINEBOY2008 01:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring advice

To avoid getting into trouble for edit warring and breaking the WP:3RR, I recommend taking your dispute with the IP about Li Jun Li in the cast on Sinners (2025 film) to the talk page, where you can discuss and come to consensus. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Would you mind deleting it for me, please? I'll start a discussion there. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 18:59, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The status quo is fine while consensus is determined, it's not an urgent issue. Thanks for starting the discussion, I'll keep an eye on it. —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:08, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion has begun. Please check it out when you have the chance. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 19:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sinners (2025 film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Look, I said the status quo would be fine. This is the 5th time you've reverted that material in less than 24 hours. You could easily be blocked for this per WP:3RR, but I'll hold off on a block as you are willing to discuss and started a discussion. Still, be on notice for edit warring. —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:36, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Got it. I'll stop.SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 19:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Grand Theft Auto VI. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me here or on my talk page. Thank you. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 03:11, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to The Amazing World of Gumball has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:22, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

This is a notice to let you know that I've reported the IP editor seeking Li Jun Li's inclusion in the poster billing on Sinners (2025 film) and committing WP:NPA violations at User talk:Dr vulpes#Thanks. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:39, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. They've been getting on my nerves. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 15:18, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. There are some ongoing discussions at Talk:Sinners (2025 film)#Plot summary edits and Talk:Sinners (2025 film)#Edit War Dispute if you are interested. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:18, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About Dora and the Search for Sol Dorado

I don't care what I say, but this film is announced to be produced for television. So I call it a "Nickelodeon Original Film". Just stop the edit war. Okay? Be reliable next time. Akhil K. (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You be reliable. A Facebook post is not a reliable source. Besides, the film is coming out on Paramount+ first, so it is technically not a "Nickelodeon Original Film." SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 02:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How about coming to Nickelodeon first, then Paramount+. Here's the source: https://deadline.com/2025/05/dora-and-the-search-for-sol-dorado-streaming-premiere-date-1236405074/. Akhil K. (talk) 16:46, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then it would premiere on Paramount+ first. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But still counts as an original film because it also says, "Nickelodeon" and according the article the quote says, "Dora and the Search for Sol Dorado, the latest live-action movie in kids franchise Dora the Explorer, is set to premiere on Paramount+ and Nickelodeon in the U.S. on Wednesday, July 2." Akhil K. (talk) 21:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Good Burger 2 was a Nickelodeon original film, and that uses Nickelodeon Movies. Same with A Really Haunted Loud House. No Time to Spy. The list goes on and on. So keep it as Nickelodeon Movies. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 21:50, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Burger 2 is not an original film, but A Really Haunted Loud House and No Time to Spy are. Including other films that are produced for television, if simulcast on Paramount+. Akhil K. (talk) 21:57, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The point remains. They all used the Nickelodeon Movies logo. That is why it shall remain up. SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 01:59, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

I noticed that you added Template:Rotten Tomatoes prose to KPop Demon Hunters, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. The documentation for the template highlights that if you set |ref=y, it only includes the reference if the "Rotten Tomatoes ID" property is defined on Wikidata. Otherwise, you need to add the reference separately in the article which I've now done. Please remember to verify and include references when using this type of template. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 15:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary

Lemme explain:

We need a plot summary for the movie. I put that there so that way editors will be encouraged to write a plot summary for the movie. Because frankly, a premise isn't enough. The majority of movies on Wikipedia have plot summaries. HiGuys69420 (talk) 03:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that we need a plot summary. But we don't add that if it's listed under the premise tab. Someone will add a plot eventually.SomeAnotherCastaway (talk) 04:55, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

heads-up!!

the list of pokémon anime characters was actually redirected over this discussion in afd, so that blar wasn't vandalism. thus, to reinstate or recreate it, you'd need to at least address the issues there. at least in my current view, that'd involve finding any sources to establish notability for the cast in general... at all, really consarn _{(grave) (obituary)} 20:38, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]