User talk:Sasha2025

I'm Sasha! I also creating pages and helping others :3

My Nickname: Sasha XD

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sasha & Pals (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sasha & Pals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:37, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sasha2025! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:37, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thank you for your time. Sasha2025 (talk) 17:52, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Sasha2025. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sasha & Pals (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sasha & Pals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:11, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sasha & Pals (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sasha & Pals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sasha & Pals (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sasha & Pals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sasha & Pals has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sasha & Pals. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank you! Sasha2025 (talk) 14:42, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sasha & Pals (January 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Has the distinct whiff of a hoax...

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:22, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Sasha & Pals

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Sasha & Pals, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I promise Sasha2025 (talk) 15:36, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome Back!

You are hired!!! Sasha2025 (talk) 16:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jade+Penny (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jade+Penny and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jade+Penny (January 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:22, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Building an encyclopaedia?

Hi, can you tell me if you have any intention to actually help us build an encyclopaedia, or are you just joking around? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:22, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do Sasha2025 (talk) 17:23, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly the many rejected/deleted hoax drafts over the past two days says otherwise... Magitroopa (talk) 17:25, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

welp- Sasha2025 (talk) 17:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 17:27, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblocked|reason=Your reason here Sasha2025 (talk) 17:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)}}[reply]

Sasha2025 (talk) 17:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sasha2025 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The reason why because I want to be here to build a encyclopedia, so yeah, I won't be blocked again, Thank You!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sasha2025 (talk) 18:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sasha2025 (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jade+Penny

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Jade+Penny, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 17:29, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Welcome back Sasha2025 (talk) 17:14, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note that it doesn't matter what blocks you play with, there's no method in which you can unblock yourself. Edit like [1] are not only ineffective at restoring your editing privileges, but they make it less likely that you will be unblocked. If you're really serious about productively editing Wikipedia, not writing up joke/hoaxes as you have so far, you ought to read WP:GAB for guidance and make a proper, serious, unblock request for one of the administrators to review. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 17:48, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Got it Sasha2025 (talk) 17:49, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Morning

Now i'm gonna tried to unblock myself Sasha2025 (talk) 15:38, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted above, that is impossible, and if you make a fake block of text dummied up to look like an approved unblock request, like you did the other day , it will likely only result in an administrator revoking your talk page privileges completely. WP:GAB describes how to request an unblock, which is the only method of being unblocked. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. It will do, Now Thank you for your time. Sasha2025 (talk) 15:56, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let me be quite clear: one more frivolous edit, and I will block you from editing this page as well. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]