User talk:Samvielsona

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Hello, Samvielsona, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 23:58, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sonar (game) (November 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tavantius (talk) 03:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Samvielsona! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tavantius (talk) 03:31, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sonar (game) (November 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 23:58, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sonar (game) (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Fancy Refrigerator was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Samvielsona the draft was reworked and has been moved to Captain Sonar. Thank you for your contribution! BOZ (talk) 02:25, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabe the Dog (meme) (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Shadow311 (talk) 21:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabe the Dog (meme) (November 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Facebook and reddit are not considered reliable sources. see WP:SPS
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Shadow311 (talk) 22:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabe the Dog (meme) (November 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
User-generated sources are not considered reliable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia blackout of 2012 (November 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lemonaka was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wikipedia article, itself, is not a reliable source, if you want to discuss about things happened on Wikipedia, you may include other kind of source. All based on CNN, you need more source for your article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
-Lemonaka 03:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Wikipedia blackout of 2012 has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wikipedia blackout of 2012. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:31, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wikipedia blackout of 2012 (November 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Royiswariii were:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Protests against SOPA and PIPA instead.
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Protests against SOPA and PIPA. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There is a existing article for that Protests against SOPA and PIPA
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Royiswariii Talk! 22:39, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Math Input Panel (Windows) (December 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bunnypranav was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Most of the content violates WP:NOTGUIDE. Not notable based on the sources mentioned as well
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gabe the Dog (meme)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Samvielsona. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gabe the Dog (meme), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wikipedia blackout of 2012

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Samvielsona. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wikipedia blackout of 2012, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:08, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Math Input Panel (Windows)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Samvielsona. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Math Input Panel (Windows), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:09, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gabe the Dog (meme)

[edit]

Hello, Samvielsona. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gabe the Dog".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy (August 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by WeirdNAnnoyed was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This article is entirely duplicative of Iroquois#Confederacy, which has much better sourcing. I also suspect this draft was LLM generated, due to its malformed image captions, text containing stray numerals in places where citations might go (e.g. "Canada28"), and vague, randomly-placed statements like "The Haudenosaunee Confederacy was an both an alliance and a unity of nations, surviving for the past several hundred years by complimentary traditions, beliefs, and cultural values".
WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:51, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Stalingrad's impacts on civilians has been accepted

[edit]
Battle of Stalingrad's impacts on civilians, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MWFwiki (talk) 01:12, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle of Stalingrad's impacts on civilians

[edit]

Hello, Samvielsona,

Thank you for creating Battle of Stalingrad's impacts on civilians.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page, as-is, relies very heavily on the NMWII source, with 39 out of 46 inline citations being from NWII. I believe additional sources exist for this article, however, and would encourage them to be added.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MWFwiki}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MWFwiki (talk) 01:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Tomorrow, I will get to work immediately on the citation issues (its about 10:00 PM right now). I am awaiting possible editors on my Wikipedia article taking notice of my work! Samvielsona (talk) 02:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You!

[edit]
The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar

A new editor on the right path
Awarded for your work on the Battle of Stalingrad's impacts on civilians article. Keep up the good work! MWFwiki (talk) 02:25, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]