User talk:RichardG98

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi RichardG98! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [VTE] 03:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi RichardG98! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:18, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Enzo Giménez moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Enzo Giménez. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources should be reliable and independent. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I greatly appreciate your comments and suggestions on the article. I have added new reliable and independent sources to improve its notability. I hope the updates will be satisfactory for your future review. Best regards. RichardG98 (talk) 17:45, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Instituto de Previsión Social. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:17, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I have added sources to the Social Security Institute article and sent it for review. RichardG98 (talk) 17:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

[edit]

Hi there, and thank you for translating articles to the English Wikipedia! As you continue editing, I recommend checking out Wikipedia's Translation How-To Guide, which includes information about appropriately attributing, as well as other guidelines. Thanks again! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:19, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

[edit]

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:33, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I understand, thanks RichardG98 (talk) 17:12, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do you? You've done it again at Alan Núñez. Citing a source you don't realize is unreliable is one thing, but citing a source you know to be unreliable is disruptive. Don't do that again. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:50, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted it after you reminded me, check it out and verify, it was listed as External Links but I deleted it and only the "Soccerway" one remained, is there a problem with that site too or not? RichardG98 (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, soccerway is fine and widely used. Take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Links for a more detailed rundown of common football related sources. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:56, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
thank you so much RichardG98 (talk) 17:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Miguel Ángel Benítez Guayuan, you may be blocked from editing. As I've already explained to you several times now, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source and should not be cited in articles. Continuing to cite it anyway is disruptive and may lead to a block if you don't stop. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:17, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was a direct translation of an article from Spanish, and I forgot to edit the Transfermarkt reference, it won't happen again. RichardG98 (talk) 16:17, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from es:Alan Núñez to Alan Núñez. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 20:18, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Instituto de Previsión Social has been accepted

[edit]
Instituto de Previsión Social, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca talk to me! 02:01, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2001 Paraguayan Primera División season. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and It also needs more sourcing so as to satisfy WP:VERIFY.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 11:45, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 1996 Paraguayan Primera División season. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and It also needs more sourcing so as to satisfy WP:VERIFY.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 17:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Ricardo Iván Marecos Ortigazo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 TT me 15:25, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]