User talk:Praj9289

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shashi Prasad Singh (September 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See Your first article. S0091 (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Praj9289! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i did the necessary changes as asked by reputed editors. This is a story worth a space and deserves an article. I have changed and brought in resources available right from newspaper to govt of india records. Let me know if it needs any further correction Praj9289 (talk) 15:44, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shashi Prasad Singh (September 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Haj was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Lacks inline citations.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
– haj ☘ (talk) 00:01, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
inline citations have been done as per new guidelines and most modern ways as soecified by you. I hope this article gets a space and an unsung hero of our independence can be spoken about. Thank you Praj9289 (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shashi Prasad Singh (September 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:58, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I checked for the guideline. The references have been updated. Present day newspaper coverages and official govt coverage makes this story acceotable as far as notability is converned. There have been hundred of significant coverages which i have referred to in this articlepost your decline. All of them are not passing comments rather full page coverage ranging from govt. and public sources. I hopr the issues are resolvedand it won't be declined any further Praj9289 (talk) 15:48, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shashi Prasad Singh (September 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shashi Prasad Singh (September 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Thilsebatti (talk) 18:14, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Praj9289! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Draft :Shaheed Shashi Prasad Singh, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:14, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shaheed Shashi Prasad Singh College moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Shaheed Shashi Prasad Singh College. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and the raw HTML needs to be replaced with wiki formatting. Please read Help:Your first article. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 21:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]