User talk:Haj

user  |   talk  |   sandbox  |   drafts  |   contribs

Update for Amad's Dream

[edit]

Dear Haj,

Thanks for reviewing my page, Amad's Dream. I did some new work. Could you please look at it? I really appreciate your time.    A.kiphayet (talk) 03:13, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are the sources you are using online? If you have the URLs, you can add them to the refs using the url= parameter. My mention of external links being used was regarding the prose/body of the article. External links are still fine for use in referencing.  haj đŸ€ talk  03:19, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Haj,
Thank you very much for your feedback and clarification. I have now updated the draft of Amad’s Dream by adding the online sources with the url= parameter inside the citation templates.
Please let me know if there are still areas that need improvement. I greatly appreciate your time and guidance in helping me bring the draft up to Wikipedia standards. Thanks! A.kiphayet (talk) 03:39, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Haj,
Would it be possible for you to review it again? At this point, I think I did well. A.kiphayet (talk) 04:37, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you recently WP:BLARed this page, but the new target doesn't actually mention the Deliboy in any way or make it clear what the connection is. Could you either add a mention, if it is due weight in the target article, or otherwise nominate the page for deletion instead of BLARing it? Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 22:54, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted to XfD it, getting errors currently. (I mainly edit from mobile, so it may just be an error on my end.) Nevermind.  haj đŸ€ talk  12:44, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mech arena

[edit]

Why is my draft reected. tell me what to do pls Bigfat12304 (talk) 09:51, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the reasons it was rejected. And please refrain from giving me AI-written replies.  haj đŸ€ talk  12:46, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi there. I noticed this edit and your edit summary. I don't think GEOLINK supports your edit; is it possible you've misunderstood the guideline? More importantly, how will it benefit our readers to have the extra (hidden) link to [[Kingdom of Italy|Italy]]? Was the subject's life greatly affected by having been born when Italy was a kingdom? I didn't see it as a net benefit to the reader, hence the removal. What do you think? John (talk) 13:12, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I have misunderstood the need to link it, however it was Kingdom of Italy at the time of his birth, which was the main concern.  haj đŸ€ talk  14:03, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Transgender issue for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transgender issue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transgender issue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hello Haj. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Workspace-manager/workspace fre dark.webp, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is enough of an edge case that I feel the need to explain further: this is "nonsense" in that it's a dramatic description of what happens if you open an image file as if it were text, but it's not patent nonsense since it's reasonably clear what the author was referring to. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:24, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification. I assumed it was maybe an edge case. Perhaps went a little too quick on pressing the button. – haj â˜˜ (talk) 02:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi,

Thanks for catching the copyright violation at Draft:AutĂłdromo Nacional. Before you tagged it for speedy deletion, you blanked the copyright violation. It's actually much easier for the reviewing admin if you don't blank it. The speedy deletion template for G12 includes a link to a tool that evaluates the copyright violation, but if you blank it, the evaluation is against the blanked version, and the reviewing admin needs to manually operate the tool against a revision with the copyrighted material present. Cheers. -- Whpq (talk) 02:31, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thought it was standard, but I guess that likely only applies to revdels. Will keep that in mind. – haj â˜˜ (talk) 02:34, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]