User talk:PeepeeDino

  1. Home
  2. Wiki
Welcome to Qiff's talk page! 👋

Feel free to leave me a message below. I try to reply when I can!

Messages

[edit]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malaysian embassy in Bern (February 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, PeepeeDino! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, PeepeeDino. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by CanonNi (talk) 01:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Malaysian embassy in Bern

[edit]

Information icon Hello, PeepeeDino. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Malaysian embassy in Bern, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Malaysian embassy in Bern

[edit]

Hello, PeepeeDino. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Malaysian embassy in Bern".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kuantan 188 Tower Logo.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kuantan 188 Tower Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:35, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, hello, thanks for the reminder. The image I uploaded will be used in an article about Kuantan 188 which I'm currently drafting. PeepeeDino (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maha Tower (May 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The current sources doesn't seem very reliable or independent.

The Island Drum is a random blog site.

Malaysian Reserve seems decent, though it doesn't have a listed author

Naturally Langkawi is the official tourist website of the area and it reads AI-generated.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ca talk to me! 23:22, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

[edit]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize and $250 worth of prizes for architectural articles. If you are interested in winning something to help you buy books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:17, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuantan 188 has been accepted

[edit]
Kuantan 188, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Katharina Otto-Bernstein. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. I strongly advise that you provide a more detailed explanation when you remove these tags, and/or provide a couple of explanation sentences on the talk page. N.B., that was not the only page where you removed tags without a full explanation. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Process

[edit]

Hi! I see you tried to nominate Bala Ganapathi William for deletion. Please make sure to fully follow the guide to how should an article be nominated at WP:AFDHOWTO, it's better to do these steps using a desktop or better yet, with Twinkle!

I had gone ahead and help you create the AfD for the article, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bala Ganapathi William. Cheers! Syn73 (talk) 18:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the assistance! Should have read on how to do it in the first place 😅, cheers to you too! PeepeeDino (talk) 18:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Kovcszaln6. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Some of your recent edits seem to be generated with an LLM. Please refrain from using them. Thanks. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 12:27, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clear use of an LLM

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as those you made to First light (astronomy), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Your submission featured a clearly-hallucinated citation to a fictitious source; please do not submit LLM-generated sources you have not personally verified to exist. Altoids0 (talk) 06:23, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted. It seems I've been caught up with tidying articles using LLMshout apparent concern over misinformation PeepeeDino (talk) 07:38, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply! Going through your contributions however, I ended up discovering a very large number of erroneous LLM changes and created made a discussion on the admin incident board before you replied, as it seems that a lot of changes have to be reverted and I don't really have the special roles necessary to do so expediently. If you could comment there as well, and maybe identify which contributions you used an LLM to create, that would be great. Altoids0 (talk) 07:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:39, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PeepeeDino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I don't understand how I was being disruptive. Maybe it was the 'nonsense' gargle in my first line (which you can thank my slow connection for) or the way I spoke? If it wasn't obvious, then I lack a concerning amount of interaction with people online using a suitable language. My way of typing is attributed to the fact I'm an ESL speaker, but that does not of course void me from being blocked for 'disruptive' behaviours. Now for my actual reason to be unblocked? I'd like to clarify a few more mistakes and give a clearly explanation?PeepeeDino (talk) 11:07, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you don't understand how providing references that don't back up the information they claim to is disruptive, you are not currently capable of contributing productively to Wikipedia. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

PeepeeDino (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I feel a long time has passed for me to realize the errors of my old habits and to properly apologize for my previous actions.

During the span of two weeks of late July to early August , I mistakenly and horrendously used a Large Language Model (Specifically ChatGPT) to help with creating new articles. While I didn't think much of it, the admins during my discussion made it extremely obvious that not only was it wrong, it tainted the site as a place for ai-slop. I would've, of course, responded in a more professional matter and tone, however the circumstances at that time would not allow me to control my own emotions and thus, my disasteruos response during my first appeal.

So, I apologize for distributing false citations and claims, article-making using ai, and ignoring previous warnings from the higher ups. I've changed since the past 2-3 months, (while I've been indefinitely blocked) by contributing to my own Wiki's language (ms-wiki) and properly learning the ropes.

Hope this appeal sees you well, and I hope the block can be lifted. PeepeeDino (talk) 10:18, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Given Richie333 has edited since, and no objections have been made, I'm unblocking on the condition that you are banned from using large-language models (in any way, shape, or form) while making any edits to Wikipedia. Sohom (talk) 13:54, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

cc @Ritchie333, thoughts? @PeepeeDino would you be willing to agree to a ban from using large-language models (in any way shape or form) while making any edits to Wikipedia as a condition to your unblock? -- Sohom (talk) 15:06, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
cc

Yes, I will sincerely stop all large-language models I've used in the past for all minor and major help. This think this also applies to translations and/or formatting code doesn't it?

If so, I'll do my best to edit with with full responsibility and precaution while also consulting help from actually more experienced editors on the site to guide me in stuff I'm less informed about. Realizating now that my efforts in churning out my old edits were just mere emotional satisfaction and not based on ensuring the quality said edits.

If it helps, I can start by re-editing my Kuantan 188 article to remove the LLM warning tag with some assistance that'll I'll definitely be needing.

Sorry again for all the trouble I've caused

PeepeeDino (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting on the blocking admin in that case. Sohom (talk) 03:40, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Chiming in to say I also support an unblock. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:49, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate all the help in my unblocking and rest assured, will keep my end of the deal. (And apologies for such a late thanks too) PeepeeDino (talk) 07:40, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maha Tower

[edit]

Information icon Hello, PeepeeDino. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maha Tower, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi PeepeeDino. Thank you for your work on Jason Chong (born 1980). Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish WP:Note. Please also fix the errors in the footnotes. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 15:04, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariamnei:
Hello and thanks for the feedback! I'll add the notes and also continue to improve the Soloz article (I think replying to both in the same reply would be less redundant?) as soon as I can.
The more technical ones are going to be a bit more slower as I'm still quite a rookie.
Have a good day to you too!
PeepeeDino (talk) 15:24, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your continued improvements. In general, we need to be quite careful about WP:BLP guidelines, but notability can wait as long as you are making continuous improvements to the pages. Have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 09:26, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi PeepeeDino. Thank you for your work on Soloz. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Since it falls under WP:BLP, please add more sources - primarily secondary sources - and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 15:10, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]