User talk:Orlandov123

Welcome!

Hi Orlandov123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, @CNMall41! Orlandov123 (talk) 16:53, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Orlandov123! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Multiple Drafts, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Improving sourcing for Dolder Waldhaus draft

Hello Orlandov123, I’m a member of WikiProject Switzerland and have been assisting with drafts in the AfC queue. Your Dolder Waldhaus draft is off to a strong start, and it’s clear you’ve put in a lot of effort. I’ve added a source from the Tages-Anzeiger and improved the "Demolition and New Construction" section to strengthen the draft’s notability. I've also copyedited the lead for neutrality, making it better align with Wikipedia’s style. However, a few key details still need clearer sourcing to ensure the draft meets Wikipedia’s standards:

Lead History: The 1879 conception date, Heinrich Hürlimann’s role, and the 1894–95 timeline for the Dolderbahn, including Ulrich Bosshard’s contract, should be directly supported by reliable secondary sources (WP:RS & WP:V). Without clear sourcing, these details may be challenged or removed.
Notability: To meet WP:GNG, the draft needs independent coverage in high-quality sources like NZZ, Tages‑Anzeiger, and Swissinfo. Primary sources, such as the organization’s own site, can be useful for details but do not establish notability.

I recommend reviewing your sources, ensuring each claim in the article is accurately cited, and rephrasing or removing any unsupported details. If you’d like to chat about the draft, please feel free to ping me. Happy editing! HerBauhaus (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HerBauhaus, thanks a lot for your edits and your kind advice, I will be glad to work on the improvements you suggested! Orlandov123 (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dolder Waldhaus has been accepted

Dolder Waldhaus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Superboilles (talk) 11:59, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Orlandov123! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Assess relevance of list article and which lists are desired on Wikipedia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Learning the Walk of Handan (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some sources don't mention the idiom at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Learning the Walk of Handan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:37, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Orlandov123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:37, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shababeek for Contemporary Art has been accepted

Shababeek for Contemporary Art, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikishovel (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: How the World Made the West: A 4,000-Year History has been accepted

How the World Made the West: A 4,000-Year History, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:22, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of military aircraft capable of nuclear weapons delivery

Hello, Orlandov123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of military aircraft capable of nuclear weapons delivery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Iron Trade

Hello, Orlandov123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Iron Trade, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Heinrich Hürlimann

Hello, Orlandov123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Heinrich Hürlimann, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:24, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Learning the Walk of Handan has been accepted

Learning the Walk of Handan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jcgaylor (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Heinrich Hürlimann

Hello, Orlandov123. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Heinrich Hürlimann".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:26, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Iron Trade

Hello, Orlandov123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Iron Trade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:54, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]