User talk:Morgan NOTI

This is Morgan NOTI's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Slick (musician) (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eric Slick (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eric Slick (musician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 00:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Morgan NOTI! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 00:48, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eric Slick

Hello, Morgan NOTI. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eric Slick, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 20:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas Dupuis (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicolas Dupuis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 20:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicolas Dupuis (musician) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicolas Dupuis (musician). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas Dupuis (musician) (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicolas Dupuis (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:35, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nicolas Dupuis (musician)

Hello, Morgan NOTI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nicolas Dupuis (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nicolas Dupuis (musician)

Hello, Morgan NOTI. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nicolas Dupuis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angela Verbrugge (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Randompersonediting was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angela Verbrugge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Randompersonediting (✍️•📚) 06:39, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Angela Verbrugge

Hello, Morgan NOTI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Angela Verbrugge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Wong moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Randy Wong. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:32, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lydia Liebman moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lydia Liebman. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:45, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Angela Verbrugge

Hello, Morgan NOTI. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Angela Verbrugge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lydia Liebman (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Lydia Liebman (publicist) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lydia Liebman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 16:55, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lydia Liebman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lydia Liebman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lydia Liebman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Morgan NOTI. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Lydia Liebman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:09, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Randy Wong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Randy Wong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

• Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
• Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
• Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:13, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:18, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Randy Wong (bassist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Randy Wong (bassist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Wong (bassist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:34, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about undisclosed paid editing

Hi there. You have repeatedly attempted to create a promotional page for Lydia Liebman, and you have also created promotional pages about Lydia Liebman clients Willy Rodriguez, Svetlana Shulmyian and Waitiki 7 member Randy Wong, all in the past couple weeks. This track record is a strong indicator of a conflict of interest. At this time, I'm asking you to respond: do you work for Lydia Liebman, are you being paid by Lydia Liebman, or do you have any connection to Lydia Liebman whatsoever? Thank you. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:43, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not work for Lydia Liebman, Svetlana Shulmyian, Randy Wong, or any other artist (including Guided by Voices), whose album page I just created . I am an unpaid, volunteer patron of music and the arts and am trying to build out the New York jazz and world music scenes for fans of these subjects. I want to always be a better Wikipedian, and figured Lydia’s Forbes 30 Under 30 passed muster for notability. This media strategist is incredibly influential in the scene, as are Svetlana Shulmyian and Randy Wong in their respective spheres. I ask to build these stubs in good faith, without payment, or unduly using large language models. Morgan NOTI (talk) 18:48, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should commit to using draft space and using AfC until you're more familiar with notability guidelines. You're otherwise likely headed for a block for promotional editing, which does not require payment. You may still have a COI even if you're a volunteer patron. Star Mississippi 18:52, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Right, right. I’m not trying to “promote” anybody, just show how they’re notable. That’s why I didn’t use fluff words like “renowned,” etc. I realize how that can sound promotional. It can be a tricky balance. Morgan NOTI (talk) 18:53, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Creating pages for non-notable people/artists is its own form of promotion, since it leverages Wikipedia's use by search engines and LLMs to enhance the visibility of its subject. You don't have to use fluffy words to be promotional. You mention Lydia on a first name basis above. You said you don't work for her, but it sounds like you know her personally? Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood re: promotion! And no, I do not know Lydia Liebman, or any of these artists/industry figures personally. I have no interest in promoting her via search engines, or at all; there is nothing in it for me in any way. I am a lifelong Wikipedia user, and I simply want to add my knowledge base. I said “Lydia” because I had already established that her name is Lydia Liebman in the paragraph, as you’ll see. Not because of personal familiarity. Morgan NOTI (talk) 19:06, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to echo @Star Mississippi's advice above, which I gave you yesterday also -- please use draftspace and submit through Articles for Creation, at least until you have a better grasp on notability. If you continue to create promotional articles in mainspace, you could be blocked from editing. And please do not repeatedly G7 your pages or move them around to different titles just because someone else nominated them for deletion or speedy deletion. Doing so repeatedly looks like you're trying to evade scrutiny, and it's disruptive to the volunteers who patrol new pages. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:12, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, I will not do that again! Was not my intention to be disruptive. I was simply trying to fix and resubmit. I will use draft space and submit through Articles for Creation from here on out, as I continue to hone my contributions and learn the ropes. Thank you both, and have a wonderful day. Morgan NOTI (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lydia Liebman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lydia Liebman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lydia Liebman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 18:45, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I will not delete the notice. I am here to collaborate with editors to make this the best it can be. I am not associated, nor do I work for Lydia Liebman, and I am avoiding all undue use of large language models. Thank you for your guidance; I am still practicing, and want to be a Wikipedian in good faith. Morgan NOTI (talk) 18:50, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Morgan NOTI. Thank you for your work on Willy Rodriguez. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Congrats and thank you for creating this page. It has passed review this time because it has some reliable sources and the subject has worked with more than 3 notable singers, band WP:MUSICBIO

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Uncle Bash007}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 06:45, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]