User talk:IND123456

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi IND123456! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of commercial nuclear reactors have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rajapuri moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Rajapuri. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,Thank you... IND123456 (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Thank you IND123456 (talk) 12:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sir/madam, I am unable to search any reilable sources for the page. Please do try if you can. There is very little information on the internet for this topic.
Thank you. IND123456 (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Tree. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Frost 12:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome. IND123456 (talk) 12:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shivajirao Patwardhan moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Shivajirao Patwardhan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steam generator (nuclear power), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages GCR and LMR. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will take precautions next time to avoid any problems.
Thanks for your assistance. IND123456 (talk) 16:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm 10mmsocket. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Heysham nuclear power station, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 10mmsocket (talk) 07:12, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you. I will do the needful. IND123456 (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fernandina

[edit]

Information icon Hello, IND123456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fernandina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rajapuri

[edit]

Information icon Hello, IND123456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajapuri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tarapur Atomic Power Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BWR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Marincyclist. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marincyclist (talk) 06:03, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As per my information, the plans for construction of units 7 and 8 have not been practically applied and have been dormant for years. Hence, I felt that there is no need of the outdated information. So, I tried to delete it. There was an error while doing it, and also I did not give any edit summary. I apologise for that.
Thank you. IND123456 (talk) 06:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your response. I suggest discussing on the article talk page, as the removal of sourced material is generally problematic. If consensus can be achieved, then removal could be appropriate. Best, Marincyclist (talk) 06:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Will do. First I will verify and then add a new topic on the talk page.
Thanks. IND123456 (talk) 07:11, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fernandina

[edit]

Hello, IND123456. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Fernandina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that update. I have been searching for proper sources and references but with little success. Will do as you adviced when I find some. IND123456 (talk) 03:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shivajirao Patwardhan

[edit]

Information icon Hello, IND123456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shivajirao Patwardhan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shivajirao Patwardhan (June 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Laura240406 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
no meaningful change since last decline
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Laura240406 (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, IND123456! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Laura240406 (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Laura240406, I am very happy that you have clearly mentioned the reason for the draft been declined. Will work on ot as soon as possible and resubmit it. Thank you. IND123456 (talk) 15:26, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shivajirao Patwardhan has been accepted

[edit]
Shivajirao Patwardhan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 11:32, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you MCE89. IND123456 (talk) 15:29, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite sources

[edit]

I undid this edit to LaSalle County Nuclear Generating Station as it did not cite a source. Per wp:verifiability, please cite wp:reliable sources. See help:referencing for beginners. Also, these edits: [1], [2], and [3] to Tarapur Atomic Power Station do not cite any source. Please note that failure to cite sources may result in a block. Question? Please ask at the wp:Teahouse for fast, expert answers.

You removed the citation here to IPHWR-700. Why? If it is out of date, please find an updated source or leave it in place or move it to an appropriate location. Please leave an wp:edit summary giving reasoning for your edits. If a link is dead, it should be left per wp:KDL. If content is not sourced, please add a {{citation needed}} tag (or use the redirect {{cn}}). See WP:TMSOURCE for more information on adding cleanup tags. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 20:41, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Will do the needful and keep in mind about whatever you said.
Thank you IND123456 (talk) 11:52, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bharat small modular reactor (October 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:14, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, will do the needful. thank you IND123456 (talk) 14:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bharat small modular reactor (October 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You’ve made a great start, and the article is getting closer to passing notability, but isn’t there yet. To pass notability, It requires 2-3 sources which are reliable, independent, secondary sources, which talk at length about the topic of the article. Unfortunately the sources you have so far aren’t quite there. Two are PR releases, which unfortunately do not count as reliable, and are also primary sources. Another two are more solid, but only mention BSMR reactors in passing while focusing on other things. The first reference is great, but we need another couple of sources of that same quality. Good luck and keep up the good work 👍
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Absurdum4242 (talk) 07:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to IPHWR. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will keep in mind. Thank you for correcting my mistake. IND123456 (talk) 17:07, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kostroma Nuclear Power Plant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PWR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi IND123456. Thank you for your work on Partial meltdown of Leningrad unit 1 and Chernobyl unit 1. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, since it has not sources, it is not ready for main space. I will be moving it to draft space. Please feel free to republish once you have added sources and footnotes. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:43, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will surely continue working on the page. I am in search of relevant data. Thank you for your support. IND123456 (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant into Draft:Partial meltdown of Leningrad unit 1 and Chernobyl unit 1. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s).

When copying within Wikipedia, at a minimum, give attribution in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination.

Please add attribution if no one has done so yet. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:20, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, got it. Will keep in mind. Thank you IND123456 (talk) 02:31, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]