User talk:CivicInk

This is CivicInk's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Welcome!

Hi CivicInk! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft moved: Joyce Dattner

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Joyce Dattner. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joyce Dattner (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joyce Dattner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joyce Dattner! I'll familiarize with the rules and come back! Have a good day! Thanks for the tips! CivicInk (talk) 19:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CivicInk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bobby Cohn! Thank you! Glad to see you! Have a good day! CivicInk (talk) 19:24, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I need to figure out how to add emoji here) CivicInk (talk) 19:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin A. Halsey has been accepted

Edwin A. Halsey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk) 15:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

404 references at Jeri Thomson

Hey, when reading through Jeri Thomson I noticed that nearly all of the external links in citations are broken. I tried to search online but was not able to find any indication that WaPo or NYTimes have published articles by the titles, authors, and dates indicated in the citations. Could you clarify where you found these sources and make sure they're correctly referenced? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:14, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you've now removed the faulty citations but could you please explain where you found those newspaper articles to cite them in the first place, since you seem to have removed all references to independent sources? The currently cited sources are not particularly useful, given that they are all primary sources insofar as they discuss Thomson directly. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:48, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments and advice. I try to respond to all comments from more experienced editors. In this case, I will continue to work on this article until I improve it. This problem arose because I initially worked in a sandbox and did not pay due attention to the integrity of the article and the consistency of sources of information.CivicInk (talk) 21:52, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me some time, I have little time for Wikipedia now, but I will try to fix everything! CivicInk (talk) 21:53, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits and replies give a very strong impression of being written by an AI. Please don't do that: they're not reliable enough to write article text, and it's disrespectful to your fellow editors. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:55, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't like the quality of my edits or my work in Wikipedia, you can place a ticket on the appropriate noticeboard. Please do not blame me for the quality of my work because it violates the fundamental principles of Wikipedia. Maybe I am not as experienced an editor as you, but we are all volunteers and I do not think that you have serious grounds to accuse me of excessive use of AI or anything else. I edit Wikipedia because I am interested in it and only when I have free time.CivicInk (talk) 22:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway thank you for your advicesCivicInk (talk) 22:00, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jeri Thomson moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jeri Thomson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:25, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Lee Sisco moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gary Lee Sisco. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:30, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Otto Gläsel page

Hello CivicInk, I created a page for German bow maker Richard Otto Gläsel. You have placed a few tags suggesting improvements to citations. I included citations from the most reliable sources such as Deutsche Bogenmacher-German Bow Makers Klaus Grunke, Hans Karl Schmidt, Wolfgang Zunterer 2000 and the latest research in the STRAD magazine by Gennady Filimonov (a well know authority on the subject) STRAD magazine April 2024 – Parisian Splendour, by Gennady Filimonov.

Can you explain how the citations can be improved or different? BTW, the maker (Richard Otto Glasel) is not a living maker, as he died in 1931. Looking forward to your reply. Thank you in advance. Milliot68 Milliot68 (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have done a great job of improving the article!CivicInk (talk) 17:00, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Ivana Arruda Leite

Hello CivicInk, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ivana Arruda Leite, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: "nominated for the Sao Paulo Prize for Literature" is a credible claim of significance. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Rusalkii (talk) 18:23, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Roberto Schaan Ferreira

Hello CivicInk, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Roberto Schaan Ferreira, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: "nominated for the Sao Paulo Prize for Literature" is a credible claim of significance. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Rusalkii (talk) 18:29, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will take a closer look at these articles. Maybe I will even try to improve/expand them. CivicInk (talk) 11:01, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]