User talk:Bexaendos

Welcome!

Hi Bexaendos! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Belbury (talk) 09:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted references

Hi Bexaendos! When removing <ref>s using blacklisted links, as you did in this edit, please be sure not to leave orphaned refs behind (e.g. these). An easy way to check is to see if the page ends up in the hidden category Category:Pages with broken reference names after your edit. Thanks! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 03:16, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sorry I wasn't paying attention to this, I'll be more careful when removing blocked references.--Bexaendos (talk) 12:33, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lenta.ru

Please note that according to WP:RSP, links to articles published on or after 12 March 2014 must be whitelisted before they can be used. However, you are removing links from articles published before 12 March 2014, which are not in fact blacklisted. So, can you please self-revert those edits? Thanks. Mellk (talk) 15:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Yes, of course, now that I've noticed this moment, I'll deal with them. Thanks Bexaendos (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Mellk (talk) 15:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stale AIV reports

Hi, there's no need to file AIV reports for users that have not edited in weeks or months. The header at AIV states that reports there are only appropriate for clear-cut ongoing disruption. Since blocking is intended to be preventative, rather than punitive, it will have no effect in curbing disruptive behavior for users who are already not actively editing; indeed, the final warning may have done the job, and blocking per a stale report would then certainly appear punitive. ^Complex/_Rational 22:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thank you for the advice, now it's clear to me what to do. Bexaendos (talk) 22:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zambesia

Hi bexaendos! I noticed you reverted numerous edits on the List of active separatist movements in Africa page. Why was this? 70.115.168.51 (talk) 19:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because you have used a string of sources that are not credible, such as facebook. Avoid this source in the future.--Bexaendos (talk) 19:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You also removed references to the UNPO which is used as a reference in many other parts of this same article. 70.115.168.51 (talk) 19:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to edit the article further according to wikipedia policies.--Bexaendos (talk) 19:57, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Bexaendos. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for your antivandalism and non-constructive edit work! -ASHEIOU (THEY/THEM • TALK) 19:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Giunchigliani edit

Hi there! I'm the Treasurer of Be the Change PAC, and was adding it to her page. Thank you for letting me know about the need for the source.

Would this article be a good enough reliable source for the additional info?

Thank you again for your help and info :) 167.154.222.154 (talk) 17:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!You can use this source to complete the article. Bexaendos (talk) 12:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pavel Fuks

Hello. This is a message to let you know that You were wrong about the evaluation of my edits in the article about Pavel Fuks. For example, the encyclopedic style of the article involves placing all points of view on this or that issue, which you probably forgot about, knowingly or unknowingly erasing the information that Fuks has nothing to do with the story with the swastika in Kharkiv. You didn't even take the time to research the source I referenced when adding new data to the article. In addition, you needlessly deleted information about the awards of the subject of the article, as well as information about his many years of charitable activities in Kharkiv under fire from your fellow citizens. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. BorborNeoneo (talk) 14:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have repeatedly tried to promote Pavel Fuks article with irrelevant information and dubious sources. Which raises a lot of questions as being a paid editor, once you do this please disclose this information. Bexaendos (talk) 10:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of dubious sources did you mean? My information took from AS.BorborNeoneo (talk) 13:34, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, some days ago you deleted authoritative reliable source lb.ua from the article about important city activities. I'm writing you here to tell that you've mistaken, and I will revert this edit. -- BorborNeoneo (talk) 19:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit: Krishnamurti's Notebook

I do not make any type of test edits in mainspace. My edit summary is descriptive. Its revert is unwarranted. 204.19.162.34 (talk) 15:40, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your modification has no use, because it is a technical modification that is not visible to anyone. Bexaendos (talk) 15:22, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:53, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

331dot (talk) 16:05, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bexaendos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please review the unblocking request as well as the contribution history that proves I am a good faith editor.

Being blocked for UPE, where a ticket has also been opened - for which I can't check the details. I request that some explanation be provided.
By being a good faith editor, which I have demonstrated over the course of 3 years (during which I have fought a string of vandalism and spam in wikipedia). By always being active in the main space (where I have reverted a string of vandalism and reverted a string of spam links).

I mention that I have not been involved during this period in any dispute involving any UPE.

Also during all this time I have been appointed with the following rights - Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers. Which also demonstrates that I am a good faith editor.
The same is mentioned in the block - also sock/meat; I answer with firm confidence that this is the only wikipedia account and I have never had any other account. Being from Russia (which is also demonstrated in my talk page), I had to use proxy because of sanctions (as I didn't have access to a string of EU, USA information and sites to verify the information once I edit the main space). I do not support this war and I am for peace!
I'm confident that this block is a technical error, and am expecting it to be unblocked, so I can be of further use in wikipedia.Bexaendos (talk) 13:53, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I reviewed the private evidence and felt it didn't support the block, so (with 331dot's permission) I've unblocked you. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 09:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to disclose the specific nature of the ticket due to documents I have signed regarding privacy and nondisclosure. I can only tell you that the block is for undisclosed paid editing and is based on information communicated to the volunteer response team queue, and that this request does not address the concerns. The number of people who can review your appeal is very small as access to the ticket is very limited. Your best bet is probably to withdraw your appeal and appeal to the Arbitration Committee via email. 331dot (talk) 15:17, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Thank you for this reply, I understand that you cannot disclose information. But it seems suspicious to be reported as a UPE without being involved in any articles, in general you can see that I didn't edit articles (more focused on vandalism and spam, likewise I have edited a few articles that were vandalized and edited by a string of sock who were blocked).--Bexaendos (talk) 16:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have reinstated the block due to additional information provided. 331dot (talk) 00:36, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]