User talk:HJ Mitchell

Hello and welcome to my talk page! If you have a question, ask me. If I know the answer, I'll tell you; if I don't, I'll find out (or one of my talk-page stalkers might know!), then we'll both have learnt something!
Admins: If one of my admin actions is clearly a mistake or is actively harming the encyclopaedia, please reverse it. Don't wait for me if I'm not around or the case is obvious.
A list of archives of this talk page is here. Those in Roman numerals come first chronologically
This talk page is archived regularly by a bot so I can focus on the freshest discussions. If your thread was archived but you had more to say, feel free to rescue it from the archive.

Blocked from Creating an Account

[edit]

I began a discussion to discuss the reason as to why I was blocked from creating an account. I don't have a history with Wikipedia. There is no basis to this block. 2601:645:C47F:8F50:7DC5:6259:8DFA:E3EA (talk) 08:15, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't meant to disallow account creation. If you have no history with Wikipedia, the block is not aimed at you. You should be able to create an account now. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:03, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
HJ Mitchell, what was the justification for using a /32 block here in the first place? Range-blocking Comcast addresses seems a bit excessive, even for a single-article pblock. The article in question only had one instance of vandalism from one address in the range, so I don't understand why many of Comcast's San Francisco-area customers are now blocked from editing an article about a rapper from Queens. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 17:42, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There has been someone hopping around Comcast IPv6s on that article for a while, though apparently they have access to a wider range than that /32. I think the chances are slim that any other unregistered editor who is also a Comcast customer in that area will want to edit that article out of all seven million possibilities. It's certainly less disruptive than shutting out all unregistered editors with semi-protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:51, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2025).

Administrator changes

readded Euryalus
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded Ragesoss

CheckUser changes

readded AmandaNP
removed SQL

Oversight changes

readded AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open on whether use of emojis with no encyclopedic value in mainspace and draftspace (e.g., at the start of paragraphs or in place of bullet points) should be added as a criterion under G15.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been closed.
  • An RfC is in progress to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Page move problem

[edit]

Hi HJ, hope you're well. I just went to move my draft User:JuneGloom07/Sofia to Sofia Nolan, only to find someone else had created the article. Would it be possible to merge my draft and its history with this one? - JuneGloom07 Talk 22:14, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

[edit]
UK Online Safety Act remains undefeated.
Plus Wiki rules, Wiki Spin, and physicists get street cred!
The price of Liberty is eternal vigilance.
And other new research findings.
Tis true: there's magic in the web of it.
With the usual mix of war, death, super heroes, a belt, and Wednesday.
It's an easy one.