User talk:Aona1212

This is Aona1212's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Keenan has been accepted

Stephen Keenan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That's great! Thank you very much!Aona1212 (talk) 11:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft moved: Luis Rincón

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Luis Rincón. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:20, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Aona1212 (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luis Rincón (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:CREATIVE) but presently it is not clear that it does.

As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. In short, "notability" requires reliable sources about the subject, rather than by the subject. Please note that some of the references would appear to be from sources that are NOT considered reliable for establishing notability and should be removed (including blogs, company websites, press releases, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Spotify etc). Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being the subject (see WP:AUTOBIO) or being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:CREATIVE criteria #3, because XXXXX").

Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luis Rincón and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 02:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Cabrils! Thanks so much for the feedback. I really appreciate it. As for my draft, I’ll see if I can support it with the right sources. Thanks again! Aona1212 (talk) 09:59, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good one. It certainly has potential! Cabrils (talk) 01:33, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! I’ve added some sources to the Luis Rincón draft. Could you please check it when you have time? Thank you! Aona1212 (talk) 11:54, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aona1212! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 02:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luis Rincón (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately the article still has problems with sources proving notability. It requires 2-3 sources which are reliable, independent, secondary sources, which talk at length about the topic of the article. Unfortunately the sources you have so far aren’t quite there. Most of the sources are retail sites directly connected to the artist, and thus not independent, all the others are interviews, except possibly the Opinion Caribe article, which is the best source of the bunch. Interviews, unfortunately, are primary as opposed to secondary sources, and so can’t help prove notability. Hopefully you will be able to find some art review pieces or profiles that aren’t interviews, and once you have those sources, we can revisit it. Until we have the sources though, no amount of editing the article itself will help with approval. Good luck and keep up the hard work 👍

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luis Rincón and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Absurdum4242 (talk) 04:50, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, @Absurdum4242! I appreciate it. I guess I will have to revisit this draft once I have better sources to support it. Aona1212 (talk) 13:39, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Keep your chin up, you’re doing great 👍 Also, just edited your Yuma Kotegawa draft a little, so that it didn’t auto delete after not being edited for 6 months. I would love to see you knock that into shape so that I could approve it too 😊 Absurdum4242 (talk) 07:49, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yuma Kotegawa? I'm not sure if I've edited this draft, but I would love to see it. Could you send me the link to it, please? Thank you. Aona1212 (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

lol, sorry, that should have been Draft:Yua Kotegawa - and now that I look carefully, it was an article you fixed some formatting on, not a draft you created 😆 I got to it through your edit stats, and assumed wrongly. Absurdum4242 (talk) 16:44, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No wonder the subject didn’t sound familiar to me. And by the way, thanks again for your feedback on my Rincon draft. I truly appreciate it. Aona1212 (talk) 21:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Coveney (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Justin Coveney and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:28, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Justin Coveney has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Justin Coveney. Thanks! Thilio^{R O B O T🤖 talk} 17:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, @Thilio. I suppose I’ll need to do more research, then. Thanks again! Aona1212 (talk) 19:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Aona1212! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Draft:Justin Coveney, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]