User talk:AadamK

This is AadamK's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murphy & Mitzi (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CF-501 Falcon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murphy & Mitzi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 22:46, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I'm a bit confused. What exactly do you mean by all of this? AadamK (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AadamK, Your article has one reference/citation (That too from YouTube, which is unreliable). All of the links lead to Wikipedia policies. You need in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject), reliable, secondary sources, which are independent of the subject. For example news articles. I hope that answers your question. If you need more help leave a reply or go to the link below (The Teahouse). Cheers, CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 22:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, right. Sorry about that. Prior to a few days ago, I never made an account on Wikipedia, as I've always been here without one. Now that I do have an account, I'm just getting confused about editing pages and even creating my own pages. AadamK (talk) 23:04, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I would suggest the Wikipedia Adventure. I will leave some helpful links. CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 00:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it. Thank you very much. AadamK (talk) 06:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AadamK! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 22:46, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello AadamK, welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

• Creating your first article
• Referencing for beginners
• Simplified Manual of Style

If you have general editing questions, the Teahouse is where you can seek help from experienced editors. Questions about the draft creation and publishing process should be directed to the Articles for creation Help Desk instead, where you can get assistance directly from reviewers. Don't hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome – I hope you enjoy your time here! CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 21:31, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Exceptional Minds, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. A source is needed to link these people to this animation studio. Belbury (talk) 11:39, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BFDI

Please do not attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:24, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My image being online.

So, when I made my user image, named User: AadamK, I noticed that my image of me didn't turn up online. Listen, if it's because you're worried I'm not comfortable of having myself be online, then don't fear. I give you permission and consent to have my image present when it is searched. AadamK (talk) 08:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This wasn't a choice made by anybody being "worried" about anything, Wikipedia user pages just aren't spidered by major search engines. Belbury (talk) 11:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, what can I do to have it present on major search engines? AadamK (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing, since Wikipedia isn't a platform for self-promotion. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:23, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murphy & Mitzi (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murphy & Mitzi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:43, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hyacinth and Sal (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hyacinth and Sal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 09:34, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hyacinth and Sal (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hyacinth and Sal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 10:00, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

==

=

Your submission at Articles for creation: Calpol (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Calpol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:06, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For ‪Pi.1415926535

{{unblock | reason=I didn't know that I was doing the wrong thing, and for that, I sincerely, formally, and do most apologize ~~~~}} AadamK (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Amazing World of Gumball. See your own thread at Talk:The Wonderfully Weird World of Gumball#This is indeed season 7. Belbury (talk) 14:36, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 00:33, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let this be a final warning. If ArtemisiaGentileschiFan had not given you this warning, I would have blocked you as not here to build an encyclopedia, specifically for this comment where you admit to trolling. Curbon7 (talk) 09:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I'm really sorry. I only do it during talks, not on the actual articles themselves. I'll stop it for all of you. AadamK (talk) 11:54, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even on talk pages it's not acceptable. And you still moved an entire page despite consensus otherwise for the sake of "trolling", that's going way beyond the talk page. Harryhenry1 (talk) 12:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But I really am sorry though. Listen, if there's anything at all I can do to make this up, I'm all ears. I don't want to start any criticism, controversy and/or drama. AadamK (talk) 12:41, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to do anything in particular, just don't troll other users or make unilateral moves against consensus from now on. Harryhenry1 (talk) 12:46, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should've clarified. By "trolling", I don't mean actual trolling, rather just funny pranks and I don't actually do it towards the users. Still, I take all of this into consideration and remember this going forward for the future. AadamK (talk) 14:06, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tommy the Fox

Hello, AadamK

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username GorillaWarfare, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Tommy the Fox, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GorillaWarfare}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:10, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tommy the Fox for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tommy the Fox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy the Fox until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:17, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mugman (2014 series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mugman (2014 series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 20:25, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mugman (2014 series) (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuicoleJR was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mugman (2014 series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QuicoleJR (talk) 16:09, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]