User talk:27 is the best number

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 5.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Desert Inn Road

Template:Attached KML/Desert Inn Road has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:30, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Rancho Drive

Template:Attached KML/Rancho Drive has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/Bonanza Road

Template:Attached KML/Bonanza Road has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:27, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Avenue (Las Vegas) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Eastern Avenue (Las Vegas). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Imzadi 1979 → 02:47, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Imzadi1979 Okay, will do. 👍 Eastern Avenue is a major arterial stroad in the Las Vegas Valley. Does that alone make it notable? If not, then why does Elkhorn Road have its own article? Thank you. 27 is my favorite number. You can ask me why here. 06:12, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

artificial intelligence

Shaun C Samuel brain on code 1221 174.224.14.211 (talk) 04:22, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@174.224.14.211 ??? 27 is my favorite number. You can ask me why here. 18:55, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eastern Avenue (Las Vegas) (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JuniperChill were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eastern Avenue (Las Vegas) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JuniperChill (talk) 22:09, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 27 is the best number! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JuniperChill (talk) 22:09, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maryland Parkway (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Imzadi1979 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maryland Parkway and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Imzadi 1979 → 00:03, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is 27 is the best number. Thank you. As above _{so below} 10:37, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

Page block from Donald Trump for a week

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the appeal process. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. Ealdgyth (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

27 is the best number?

Why not 67 or 41? —Matrix _{ping me}^{when u reply} (t? - c) 16:26, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:Created by bot

Template:Created by bot has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bearcat (talk) 13:03, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]