Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in Peru
| The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to COVID-19, broadly construed, a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charts
[edit]Have there been any issues with the graphs recently? I see the first one is continuously updated, but those on the Statistics section are stuck at December 7.--179.6.192.157 (talk) 20:12, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Merger discussion
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Should COVID-19 pandemic in La Libertad be merged into COVID-19 pandemic in Peru?
- Support merger. Mccapra (talk) 14:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose: Make one for every region IF POSSIBLE Mausebru (talk) 18:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support - no benefit in having these distributed stublets when the material would easily and helpfully make a subsection of this article. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support - readers are better served by a single article, rather than having to switch back and forth between these stubs. Onel5969 TT me 11:45, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 12 July 2021
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please delete the "Notes" section because there aren't any notes right now, and there's no need for a section consisting of nothing. Someone can always put it back later if more notes are added at some point. 74.98.192.38 (talk) 20:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
Effects section is misleading
[edit]The article states "The COVID-19 pandemic in Peru exposed the weaknesses of the country's neoliberal framework.". The source linked is an article that seems to discuss the 2021 Presidential Election (the article is behind a pay wall). I propose to eliminate this sentence altogether. There is no evidence that the pandemic exposed the weaknesses of the country's neoliberal framework as its effects were seen across the globe regardless the political or economic framework. Jeremy Hillary Boob, Ph.D (talk) 23:17, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- That one stood out to me as well. Not only are the sources bullshit, the claim also makes no sense. 96.241.26.70 (talk) 20:21, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Grammatically incorrect sentence
[edit]Under the Government Response section, the following sentence:
"This was partly attributed to days that women were permitted to leave culminated in long lines and crowded supermarkets, causing a difficulty in maintaining social distancing guidelines."
...is wrong because it confuses two independent clauses.
It should say:
"This was partly attributed to days that women were permitted to leave culminating in long lines and crowded supermarkets, causing a difficulty in maintaining social distancing guidelines." ~2025-36105-40 (talk) 17:55, 24 November 2025 (UTC)


