User talk:VivatLondinium

This is VivatLondinium's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, VivatLondinium!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 01:20, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Émile Ullmann has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Émile Ullmann. Thanks! Astra Travasso (talk) 18:01, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arrondissements of Paris (1795-1859) has been accepted

Arrondissements of Paris (1795-1859), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 01:20, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Émile Ullmann (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Itzcuauhtli11 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Looks like this article was translated from the one in French Wikipedia. As Astra Travasso commented, the article needs expansion an sourcing. Both referenced sources are dead. The way back machine doesn't have them archived. The external links are of little use.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Émile Ullmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 04:55, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VivatLondinium! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 04:55, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:19th-century Deputy Commissioners of Police of the Metropolis

A tag has been placed on Category:19th-century Deputy Commissioners of Police of the Metropolis indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:31, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work

Nice work on translating Maks Erik and Michael Beizer. Andre🚐 01:41, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Dachkevitch moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Roman Dachkevitch. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 01:42, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @VivatLondinium, I improved the article for you and moved it from the draft space to the main article space. Based on what I saw in the Ukrainian version, there’s still a lot more that can be added about him. I’d be glad if you could expand it. Thank you for your contribution! TouchedWithFire (talk) 07:53, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Bilokur moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ivan Bilokur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:19, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Beizer moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Michael Beizer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 17:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lore Noack-Heuck moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lore Noack-Heuck. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 17:02, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 August 5 § Category:Metropolitan Police officers

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 August 5 § Category:Metropolitan Police officers on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 03:50, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frederick William Spurgin

Hello, VivatLondinium

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Klbrain, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Frederick William Spurgin, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 11:40, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi VivatLondinium. Thank you for your work on Augustus Joseph Pepper. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this biography for a forensic pathologist, best know for both the cases in which he testified and as an author of a textbook: Elements of surgical pathology. It's clear and focussed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 11:48, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Frederick William Spurgin

Hello VivatLondinium, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Frederick William Spurgin, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederick William Spurgin.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 19:28, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi VivatLondinium. Thank you for your work on Roman Dachkevitch. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 02:53, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Prince of Soissons

Hello, VivatLondinium,

Thank you for creating Prince of Soissons.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add in-line citations at the end of each sentence to back up each claim. Have a great day!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mariamnei (talk) 11:24, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Wilhelm Boeck

Hello, VivatLondinium,

Thank you for creating Wilhelm Boeck.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article. A few things I see
Per WP:MOS, consider to expand the lead to summarize his key career points (Picasso/Cézanne, Grieshaber, awards, Tübingen). I think there is an over reliance on potential primary sources (dissertation, old university bulletin) for basic biographical facts.
Consider restructuring the Life/Leben section into logical subsections (e.g., Education, Career, Expertise)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Noxoug1}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Noxoug1 (talk) 13:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi VivatLondinium. Thank you for your work on Edward Wilkinson (secret agent). Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hello. You include only 1 inline citation: "David Site Harrison". Is it a person's name, website, URL, etc.? Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]