User talk:Tlupick

This is Tlupick's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liz Evans (nurse) (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Z1720 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article is very close to fulfiling the requirements of getting accepted as an article. Since this article is a WP:BLP all claims need to be cited, including that she is the cofounder of Insite. (first paragraph) Also, the last paragraph describes info about The Portland Hotel Society, which doesn't directly relate to Evans and should be removed (keep the article focused on Evans's biography). Feel free to ping me when the article is fixed and I'll review again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Liz Evans (nurse) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Liz Evans (nurse), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Z1720 (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tlupick! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Z1720 (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liz Evans (nurse) has been accepted

Liz Evans (nurse), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Z1720 (talk) 18:29, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hi Tlupick! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Johann Hari several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Johann Hari, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cordless Larry. Thank you for taking the time to write me about this. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia editing, and this is the first time I've had someone disagree with one of my edits. I have shared some of my concerns about Hari's page at Talk:Johann Hari, but I can be more specific, and I will try again. Thanks for your time. Tlupick (talk) 21:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Johann Hari

Hi Tlupick, your Wikipedia editing focuses heavily on the Johann Hari article. Do you have any Wikipedia:Conflict of interest on this subject? cagliost (talk) 22:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. No conflict. Tlupick (talk) 22:06, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I note he provided a blurb for your book "Fighting for space". cagliost (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tlupick! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of an article. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you.Dan Murphy (talk) 03:35, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan Murphy With respect, you enacted a major page revision, undoing all edits made over the preceeding 6-8 months. You did that without any stated justification or discussion on the Talk page. There is obvious disagreement over this major revision of the page. I am simply asking for the issue to be explained and discussed on the Talk page before being enacted. Thank you for your time. Tlupick (talk) 16:54, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Johann Hari. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. You obviously do not have consensus for your preferred version, and Wikilawering on the talk page is not an excuse to edit war. Grayfell (talk) 00:25, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Travis_Lupick. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 23:58, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]