User talk:Timaogi

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Barbato (May 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samoht27 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs more references.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
-Samoht27 (talk) 19:22, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Timaogi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Samoht27 (talk) 19:22, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shakeel Ahmad Meer moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Shakeel Ahmad Meer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:45, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christina Rahm (research scientist) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christina Rahm (research scientist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Rahm (research scientist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AndySailz (talk) 11:53, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hiya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with anything that you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). See the conflict of interest guideline (or the plain and simple version) for more information. In short—

Please avoid editing or creating articles about anything you have a COI with; instead, propose changes using the Edit Request Wizard or submit drafts through Wikipedia:Articles for creation, and be sure to disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI).

Also, if you're being paid for your edits here, in addition to what's mentioned above, you are also required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use to disclose this your employer/client and affiliation—see Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

If you think I made a mistake and you don't actually have a COI, or if you have any questions about this or editing Wikipedia in general, please let me know! Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 18:16, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Christina Rahm (research scientist)

[edit]

Hello, Timaogi,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Agent VII and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Christina Rahm (research scientist), for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Agent VII}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Agent 007 (talk) 11:41, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Metal Park moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Metal Park, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. COOLIDICAE🕶 20:25, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Timaogi. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Timaogi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Timaogi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. COOLIDICAE🕶 20:25, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Laura Barbato

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Timaogi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Laura Barbato, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shakeel Ahmad Meer

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Timaogi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shakeel Ahmad Meer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]