User talk:AndySailz

Nomination of Naijatastic for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naijatastic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naijatastic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reading Beans (talk) 06:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Attention!

[edit]

Hello @AndySailz, This Anurag Jain Wikipedia page meets notability under WP:NPOL and satisfies the criteria set by WP:GNG. Therefore, it should not be disrupted or edited inappropriately. If you are new to Wikipedia, it is strongly advised to seek guidance from experienced editors or Wikipedia Fellows before taking major actions. Taking invalid or uninformed steps can lead to being blocked. Happy editing! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@S-Aura, In that case please provide significant coverage to justify its notability, and then you can move it to mainspace. AndySailz (talk) 10:09, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Anurag Jain is the Chief Secretary of Madhya Pradesh, holding one of the highest and most prestigious positions in the state government of India. As the top-ranking bureaucrat in the state. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:20, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have any discussion on Wikipedia that Chief Secretary is the notable position in India? Or do we have any references that meet the criteria WP:SIGCOV. AndySailz (talk) 10:22, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[1],[2] or [3] and many more sources. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Are you suggesting that the position of Chief Secretary isn’t notable? That’s surprising. In India, the Chief Secretary (India) is the highest-ranking bureaucrat in a state, responsible for coordinating all departments and advising the Chief Minister. Dismissing it as anything less like calling it a clerk position shows a serious misunderstanding of Indian governance. This isn’t just my opinion and it’s basic, widely known administrative structure. For anyone familiar with how the Indian bureaucracy functions? and Chief Secretary’s role is unquestionably significant and notable. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Until reaching any consensus, I can't say whether the subject in its position is notable! I am just following the Wikipedia norms. I am not opposed to your articles; however, I have a concern: is there any discussion regarding the notability of the chief secretary of any Indian state? AndySailz (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:CycloneYoris. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. I've already told you not to leave draft notices on my talk page, especially since I'm not the author of those drafts. CycloneYoris talk! 13:30, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CycloneYoris, The error occurred as a result of MoveToDraft JavaScript, it was unintentional. You did not inform me about this before. This is your first message on my talk page.AndySailz (talk) 22:50, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:GermanKity per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GermanKity. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 09:31, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]