User talk:Theinricks

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Theinricks! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 16:39, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spectacle (company) (September 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 18:00, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello RangersRus,
Can you please clarify where this article does not meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and notability of the subject? With the exception of a business' website, all links used are from independent, reliable, published sources (RAIC, Canadian Interiors, etc.)
Furthermore, the template of the article aligns with other similar articles that have been posted and accepted by Wikipedia e.g. SO-IL - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SO-IL, OMA - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_for_Metropolitan_Architecture etc.)
Thank you for clarifying precisely where this article is out of alignment with Wikipedia's policies. Theinricks (talk) 18:20, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]