User talk:Thehistorian999

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

November 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm HistoryofIran. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Muhammad bin Tughluq, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:09, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I Have replied so I hope you respond soon Thehistorian999 (talk) 07:12, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Plants vs. Zombies (video game), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Signed, SleepyRedHair. (talk - contribs) 02:58, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon

Hello Thehistorian999. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Thehistorian999. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Thehistorian999|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 10:19, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Answers to questions

[edit]

I would happily like to know which part you think needs citation; I will add details immediately. I have written all the information from these sources.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

  1. ^ Chandra, Satish (2007). History of Medieval India. Orient BlackSwan. pp. 65–72. ISBN 9788125032267.
  2. ^ Jackson, Peter (1999). The Delhi Sultanate: A Political and Military History. Cambridge University Press. pp. 208–214. ISBN 9780521543293.
  3. ^ Chopra, P. N. (2003). A Comprehensive History of Medieval India. Sterling Publishers. ISBN 9788120725089.
  4. ^ Habib, Mohammad; Nizami, K. A., eds. (1970). A Comprehensive History of India, Vol. V: The Delhi Sultanate. People’s Publishing House. pp. 321–340.
  5. ^ Barani, Ziauddin (1357). Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi [Chronicles of Firoz Shah] (in Persian). Barani describes Muhammad bin Tughlaq as an intellectual ruler whose experiments often failed due to haste.
  6. ^ Ibn Battuta, Abu Abdullah Muhammad (2009). The Travels of Ibn Battuta. Cosimo Classics. pp. 152–156. ISBN 9781605206219.

Now can I add these to the references list and make my changes go public again ?

Thehistorian999 (talk) 04:05, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you already did make your changes public. And thanks for listing the sources you used, but you need to be more precise. Respectfully, no one wants to read multiple pages to verify something (WP:VER). I'm sure you can divide the pages by citing more of the same source (see WP:CITE). And please cite the source to info that is actually related to it, instead of citing all your sources at the bottom of a wall of text. Because at its current state, it's impossible to verify the information you added. Your sources should ideally be secondary sources by experts on the field (WP:PST, WP:SCHOLARSHIP, WP:DUE). See also WP:SYNTH and WP:OR just to be safe. For inspiration on how to present an article, see the articles at WP:FA and WP:GA. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:35, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was waiting for the reply but as a comparatively new contributor i couldn't stop myself from publishing
Thank you very much I will try to be more precise and improve Thehistorian999 (talk) 15:12, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Criticize. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Indian Maritime University Navi Mumbai seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ‎ Criticize (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Criticize. I noticed that you recently removed content from Indian Maritime University Navi Mumbai without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.‎ Criticize (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added content after the references page
I wanted reference page to be at the end so i wanted to remove it and add it to the back of the article Thehistorian999 (talk) 15:35, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It was my bad opps Thehistorian999 (talk) 15:45, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I've reverted back to the original revision. Feel free to restore once the issues have been addressed. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:28, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i did it
Making it public Thehistorian999 (talk) 11:19, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doing it all over

[edit]

I am removing the block of citations and the other references it was a error form my side. I think it will be better if we take care of this page together instead of removing each other's work I will go ahead and give the informations with the hyperlinks like pandit,Buddhist monks etc and you take care of references and citations Thank you if you read so far, I hope you help me in the references Thehistorian999 (talk) 04:07, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know you don't like to read long informations but I tried to remove the wall of text and block of citations form the end hope you understand from my part
Not editing it until you say Thehistorian999 (talk) 04:18, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ibrahim Nizam Shah (November 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Wikishovel (talk) 07:33, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Thehistorian999! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 07:33, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello I was wondering if you can teach me how to make drafts better. Thehistorian999 (talk) 07:39, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ganguram (November 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: K.C. Das Private Limited (November 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: K.C. Das Private Limited (November 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Many unsourced sections.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
331dot (talk) 10:20, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have not received any payment in any way

[edit]

I tried to make it as less promotional as possible. No one has ever paid me to do this and I never accept any payments from anyone.I wanted to mention the unique features of the company and its advantages. I will try remove them as soon as possible and the references issue I can understand because it is not a very popular topic i will include more information. Thehistorian999 (talk) 10:29, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]