User talk:Slavko.kumer

Welcome!

Hello, Slavko.kumer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! OnionRing (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Slavko.kumer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article TelemediaUkraine, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. OnionRing (talk) 06:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TelemediaUkraine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TelemediaUkraine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TelemediaUkraine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mitte27 (talk) 13:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Telmone (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Telmone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:41, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slavko.kumer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:41, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:51, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jim.

Seems like it I use AI to intensive what leed to beeing blocked. I used it to avoid that kind situation. My aim was to make fully non emotialn facts only wiki contribution of my company.

Is there any chance to let me know what should be changed in order to unblock me as a contributor and what should be done, except rewriting it (and sopouse leaving sources). Slavko.kumer (talk) 19:42, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Slavko.kumer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand I was blocked for COI/promotion (related to Telmone). I’ve read the policies and will follow them: • I will disclose my COI on relevant Talk pages and avoid promotional tone (per WP:COI/WP:NPOV). • I will use the Articles for Creation process and discuss changes on Talk instead of editing mainspace directly. • I’m requesting an unblock (or a partial unblock limited to draft/talk namespaces) so I can contribute constructively.

If I misunderstood the block reason, please let me know what I should change going forward. Thank you.

Decline reason:

According to GPTzero, this unblock request is wholly AI-generated. Given that you are blocked (not ChatGPT), we are interested in hearing from you. Unblock requests must reflect your own understanding of the block and your willingness to follow Wikipedia’s policies going forward. Because this request does not demonstrate that you understand why you were blocked or how you plan to change your editing behavior, the request is declined. You are welcome to submit a new request written in your own words. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:51, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Slavko.kumer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Seems like it I use AI to intensive what leed to beeing blocked. I used it to avoid that kind situation. My aim was to make fully non emotialn facts only wiki contribution of my company.

Is there any chance to let me know what should be changed in order to unblock me as a contributor and what should be done, except rewriting it Slavko.kumer (talk) 23:25, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a database of things that exist, where companies can tell about themselves. A Wikipedia article summarizes what independent reliable sources choose on their own to say about topics that meet our criteria, such as a notable company. You will not be unblocked to, in the short term, edit about your company. If you want to edit about something else, please tell what; I'm also concerned about your English skill; if your primary language is Ukrainian or Russian, you may feel better editing those Wikipedias instead. 331dot (talk) 09:04, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.