User talk:Sigma elephant

Welcome!

Hello, Assawongkvin! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou so much for your help and useful information, I will try my best and if it still doesn't work I will get help. Thankyou once again! Assawongkvin (talk) 02:10, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou I will try that out Assawongkvin (talk) 13:04, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Assawongkvin/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 12:43, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Assawongkvin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 12:43, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:01, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:30, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Assawongrat Assarangchai (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Assawongrat Assarangchai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:03, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Assawongrat Assarangchai (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RangersRus were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Assawongrat Assarangchai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 16:52, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Assawongkvin! The thread you created at the Teahouse, I can’t successfully create an article about an artist I like., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Assawongkvin. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:18, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another welcome, and some advice

Hi @Assawongkvin, I see you've been welcomed and given some introductory links about Wikipedia. I recommend you also read our advice for younger editors, especially the points about not revealing personal information or trying to write an article about yourself. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 14:13, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Assawongkvin You've been given good advice at the Teahouse, but I want to emphasise the warning here: Do not write articles about yourself. This might sound harsh, but it's for your own safety. Young people who share too much personal information on the internet can be targeted by people with very bad intentions. (Also, we discourage anyone from writing articles about themselves because it's a conflict of interest and makes it difficult to maintain a neutral point of view.)

Please do take up the other suggestions for learning how to edit other articles here or on the Thai Wikipedia. I just really want to advise you not to try to return to your draft autobiography – not in a few months, not in a few years, not ever. If you are wiki-notable, someone else might independently decide to write about you, which is how articles are supposed to develop. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 01:11, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Assawongrat Assarangchai (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anachronist was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Assawongrat Assarangchai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Anachronist (talk) 15:45, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi, I observed your draft.. I suggest you to remove all the social media links and citations and, re-write the draft properly by yourself. And, provide more reliable sources; you may check this list to ensure its reliability.

If you don't have enough reliable independent sources; the draft most likely to be declined. —𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨(𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 01:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I only added a few more words and used most of the wordings from different news articles and combined them so that it would look more beautiful, I don't understand, is this not like ethical enough or like. Assawongkvin (talk) 08:24, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to ask again, but for the social media links do you mean YouTube links or my own social media, because most of the links in my ref list are tvshows Assawongkvin (talk) 08:26, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So far you've been ignoring everything I post here, but now that you've started engaging, can you please confirm that you have read and understood

• WP:AUTOBIO, which explans you why you shouldn't be writing about yourself at all; and
• WP:PROMO, which tells you that promotion of any kind, including self-promotion, is strictly not allowed on Wikipedia.

I'm asking you to confirm these points, because your editing so far suggests that you may not understand one or both of them, despite the numerous warning and advice messages posted here and elsewhere.

Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:37, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm so sorry for not replying you, i thought u were an Ai in Wikipedia, like a bot, I'm so sorry, from now on I will reply to every message, I do understand that autobiography is discouraged but I've written a lot already and it took a lot of time and effort, which is quite sad to quit now, but I tried keeping all wordings as neutral as possible and changed my wordings by only using words that were written clearly in news articles. Do you want me to quit at this point, I understand that you are scared that I will write about advertising or promotional, but I only use the information that came from reliable sources only and it's just almost like any other biography. I hope you understand but I open to any advise from you, once again, sorry for not replying. Assawongkvin (talk) 09:32, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not a bot or AI, I'm very much a real person. In fact, I'm one of the administrators here on the English Wikipedia, and in that capacity I need to warn you that you are already getting quite close to being blocked for self-promotion. If you still wish to proceed, please do so with caution.

Your draft is pending another review. I don't believe it still demonstrates notability, but I don't want to review it again myself, since I've already reviewed it once. If it gets accepted this time, great. But if it doesn't, then my advice to you is to drop this matter, forget about trying to get into Wikipedia, and focus on your music career instead. If you one day become notable enough to justify a Wikipedia article, then someone may well write one. That someone should ideally be entirely unconnected to you.

One final point: please see an article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. It explains some of the downsides of being featured in a Wikipedia article. One of them is that, once published, the article will be editable by anyone, and they may include in it things that you'd rather they didn't. In fact, it's worse than that: everyone else will be able to edit the article, except you; you may only make edit requests, which other editors may or may not implement. I've seen many cases of people struggling to get an article on themselves or their business etc. published on Wikipedia, later on deciding they don't like what it says, and then finding it almost impossible to get the article changed or deleted. I'm sure many of them wish they never bothered in the first place. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:01, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thankyouuu very much for your advice, I am very much carful and aware, but I myself have a second account for editing once it's published, is it possible for you to advise me to what else to do be notable enough to pass. Maybe I will cancel this time's submission and I will send u when I'm done editing and if you confirm that it will pass, maybe I will send for submission again and maybe you can accept it for me. Is that possible??? Would that bother you too much, I'm so sorry for asking too much. Thankyou very much Assawongkvin (talk) 10:28, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Assawongkvin now that you are replying to some messages here, can you also acknowledge that you have read my advice and warnings (further up this page) about keeping yourself safe as a young person? You have already shared too much personal information in your draft and at the teahouse. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 11:07, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I totally understand about your warnings, but the reason that I wrote about my personal details is because it is already written in news articles and the tv shows that I went before, I'm just combining them to make the sources much more reliable, but I'm trying not to write anything sensitive to everyone including me, I hope you understand and Thankyou verymuchhh Assawongkvin (talk) 11:27, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]