User talk:Serilly

	; Archives (Index) ;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is Serilly's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Sylveon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sylveon. Thanks! 11WB (talk) 19:44, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Serilly, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay and continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Below are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! 11WB (talk) 19:47, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sylveon has been accepted

Sylveon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

11WB (talk) 01:50, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Sylveon is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Sylveon is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 16:44, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vylet Pony (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GregariousMadness was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Vylet Pony doesn't yet meet notability standards for Wikipedia as much of the coverage in WP:RS has been around her work and not about her herself, and thus doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV. However, I believe Love & Ponystep sufficiently meets WP:GNG. I have created the article for the album and have moved the Vylet Pony redirect from Brony music to that article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vylet Pony and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 01:03, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Serilly! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 01:03, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toontown Rewritten has been accepted

Toontown Rewritten, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 06:20, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Toontown Rewritten logo.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toontown Rewritten logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 14:43, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Xenofiction

Hi there! I happened to see your recently-created article xenofiction, and I wanted to let you know that I found it very interesting. Might I suggest nominating it at WP:Did you know within seven days of its creation (in this case, the move from WP:Draftspace to article space)? After a quick read-through, I expect that it could also be made ready for WP:Good article nomination before too long.

If you are generally interested in writing articles about speculative fiction, I might recommend checking out WP:WikiProject Science Fiction (which is unfortunately not very active at the moment). I'm somewhat active in editing in this area myself, so if there's anything you wonder about writing these kinds of articles you can always ask me at my talk page (though I might not always be able to give good answers). I'll also ping another editor active in this area who I think will find the xenofiction article interesting and might have further guidance to offer: Piotrus. TompaDompa (talk) 21:13, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I might, if I can think of a good DYK ^^; ⋆˚꩜｡ serilly! (he/him) (talk) 22:24, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quick hint: AI does a great job of coming up with hooks for me, just tell it to come up with a DYK hook for Wikipedia and paste in your article, then choose the ones you like from its suggestions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Serilly! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Withdrawing an AFC, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:10, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Sylveon has failed

Your good article nomination of the article Sylveon has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]