User talk:SanDiegoDan

Nomination of Serenity Cox for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serenity Cox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serenity Cox (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Laun chba ller 15:55, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Serenity Cox

On 20 August 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Serenity Cox, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American MILF porn star Serenity Cox was a nurse for fifteen years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Serenity Cox. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Serenity Cox), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Blueprint (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LuniZunie was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Blueprint and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 21:01, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SanDiegoDan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 21:01, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Serenity Cox

Hi. Please don't add unsourced content to articles, especially not to biographies of living persons. Thank you.--Laun chba ller 22:49, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]