User talk:Robertsky
Pending changes settings
[edit]Hello @Robertsky, do you know if the below listed messages could be removed / hidden in this article (they did not appear previously).
Desktop view (when hovered over)
- Page version status
- This is an accepted version of this page
This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 2 November 2025.
- This is an accepted version of this page
Mobile view (permanent)
- This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 2 November 2025.
It now looks as if the page has become even more protected, although it is my understanding is the opposite has occurred. Perhaps the solution used in this article could be adopted: it produces a discrete padlock in the top right corner, instead of the check mark symbol, above mentioned messages and additional lock currently found here.
Thank you kindly for looking into this. Sincerely, Pinacotecus (talk) 17:52, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Pinacotecus This was changed awhile back in 2024, I believe with phab:T191156. The message when there are pending changes does give pause to anon mobile editing though as it states that there are changes to be approved. I think this is best discussed at WP:VPT. – robertsky (talk) 22:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
@Robertsky, thank you for your response. I believe the simplest solution to remove the undesired Page version status messages above the Arc de Triomphe article would be one of the options listed below:
- Changing the protection settings to semi-protected, like in this article: Eiffel Tower (this article only has one discrete padlock icon in the top right corner)
- Removing the protections settings, like in this article: Palace of Versailles (this article has no protection messages and icons; semi-protected settings could be added again if needed)
Please advise which one you would recommend. Sincerely, Pinacotecus (talk) 16:22, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Pinacotecus the current protection was put in place after a request to lower it from a indef semi protection put in place since 2011 at RFPP/D. I have yet to see edits from anon editors since the current protection measures. I am unwilling to go back to semi protection as such. However, the other option of full unprotection is more tenable for now. As such I will have this done. However, if there are vandalism happening thereafter and depending on the severity, pending changes protection will be back up as it still does give anon editors the opportunity to constructively contribute to the article. – robertsky (talk) 00:17, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Anniversary Robertsky 🎉
[edit]Hey @Robertsky. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 19 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 07:51, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Question from Loula ama on NotebookLM (21:21, 31 October 2025)
[edit]مرحبا --Loula ama (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Tech News: 2025-45
[edit]Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Updates for editors
- Administrators will now find that Special:MergeHistory is now significantly more flexible about what it can merge. It can now merge sections taken from the middle of the history of the source (rather than only the start) and insert revisions anywhere in the history of the destination page (rather than only the start). [1]
- For users with "Automatically subscribe to topics" enabled in their preferences, starting a new topic or adding a reply to an existing topic will now subscribe them to replies to that topic. Previously, this would only happen if the DiscussionTools "Add topic" or "Reply" widgets were used. When DiscussionTools was originally launched existing accounts were not opted in to automatic topic subscriptions, so this change should primarily affect newer accounts and users who have deliberately changed their preferences since that time. [2]
- Scribunto modules can now be used to generate SVG images. This can be used to build charts, graphics and other visualizations dynamically through Lua, reducing the need to compose them externally and upload them as files. [3]
- Wikimedia sites now provide all anonymous users with the option to enable a dark mode color scheme, featuring light-colored text on a dark background. This enhancement aims to deliver a more enjoyable reading experience, especially in dimly lit environments. [4]
- Users with large watchlists have long faced timeouts when editing Special:EditWatchlist. The page now loads entries in smaller sections instead of all at once due to a paging update, allowing everyone to edit their watchlists smoothly. As part of the database update, sorting by expiry has been removed because it was over 100× slower than sorting by title. A community wish has been created to explore alternative ways to restore sort-by-expiry. If this feature is important to you, please support the wish! [5]
View all 31 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, the fixing of the persisting highlighting when using VisualEditor find and replace during a query. [6]
Updates for technical contributors
- Since 2019 the Wikimedia URL Shortener at https://w.wiki is available for all Wikimedia wikis to create short links to articles, permalinks, diffs, etc. It is available in the sidebar as "Get shortened URL". There are 30 wikis that also install an older "ShortUrl" extension. The old extension will soon be removed. This means
/s/URLs will not be advertised under article titles via HTMLclass="title-shortlink". The/s/URLs will keep working. [7] - On Thursday, October 30, the MediaWiki Interfaces and SRE Service Operations teams began rerouting Action API traffic through a common API gateway. Individual wikis will be updated based on the standard release groups, with total traffic increased over time. This change is expected to be non-breaking and non-disruptive. If any issues are observed, please file a Phabricator ticket to the Service Ops team board.
- MediaWiki Train deployments will pause for the final two weeks of 2025: 22 December and 29 December. Backport windows will also pause between Monday, 22 December 2025 and Thursday, 2 January 2026. A backport window is a scheduled time to add things like bug fixes and configuration changes. There are seven deployment trains remaining for 2025. [8]
Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki
In depth
- In 2025, the Wikimedia Foundation reported that AI systems and search engines increasingly use Wikipedia content without driving users to the site, contributing to an 8% drop in human pageviews compared to 2024. After detecting bots disguised as humans, Wikimedia updated its traffic data to reflect this shift. Read more about current user trends on Wikipedia in a Diff blog post.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 19:31, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2025).

- The speedy deletion criteria U5 has been repealed, with U6 and U7 replacing it. See the FAQ for more clarifications.
- Community-designated contentious topics may now be enforced and appealed at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard (AE) as a result of an RfC.
- You can enable a handy user info card next to usernames, which when clicked displays edit count, blocks, thanks, and other information. To enable this feature, visit Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options →
Enable the user info card
- The arbitration case Transgender healthcare and people has been closed
- Uninvolved administrators may impose an AE participation restriction on any thread at the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard.
- An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Hello! I was just interested in asking if correcting grammar mistakes is okay. I have found an end quote without a defined start quote. --Barodaian (talk) 07:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Barodaian yes. correcting grammar mistakes is okay, and even expected. – robertsky (talk) 07:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)