User talk:ReaderofthePack

·

	Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

Women in Red September 2025

Women in Red | September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349 Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run Q & R | Women writers & their works | Microstates Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Wikipedia:Developing Countries WikiContest runs 1 July 2025 until 30 September 2025 Tip of the Month: Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published. Progress ("moving the needle"): The WikiProject Women in Red homepage is usually updated weekly, using the Humaniki tool. Sadly, Humaniki has been out of action since 23 June. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Sad news

Hello, I'm sorry to inform you that MichaelQSchmidt, a prolific Wikipedian, has passed away. You appeared in his ten most-edited talk pages (other than his own), so I thought I'd let you know. Condolences can go to his talk page, where there's a link with more details. Graham87 (talk) 17:46, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow - thank you for letting me know! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:35, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rusty Lake (series) (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Right now it fails WP:GNG. However, this article should be SIGCOV that has not yet been incorporated into the reception. With that, it should likely squeak by notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rusty Lake (series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:48, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• @Zxcvbnm: With reception, do you mean that you want the reception to be in its own section? So far I've been including it in the sub-section for each individual game. I can move that all down into a general section, if that's what you are looking for. I just need to know what you have in mind. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:39, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Game by game reception is fine, but some element of full series reception is also needed, and there are sources that say it, but I suggested another source that contains it. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:27, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Well... many of the reviews do tend to look at the series as a whole. From what I've seen of the series from working on the article, it's one of those cases where the individual games can be played as standalone entries but don't make as much sense story-wise unless you play them all. (My knowledge is limited generally to watching a video of Hotel getting played.) ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:39, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run S & T | Women in STEM | Halloween Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Sister wikiproject Women in Green October 2025 Good Article Edit-a-thon focuses on What Women Do Tip of the Month: Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia. Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period: 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women) 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women) Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:33, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]