User talk:Pyrotec

This user may have left Wikipedia. Pyrotec has not edited Wikipedia since 6 June 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

edit count | edit summary usage

Archives

07Q4 - 08Q1 - 8Q2 - 08Q3 - 08Q4 - 09Q1 - 09Q2 - 09Q3 - 09Q4 - 10Q1 - 10Q2 - 10Q3 - 10Q4 - 11Q1 - 11Q2 - 11Q3 - 11Q4 - 12Q1 - 12Q2 - 12Q3 - 12Q4 - 13Q1 - 13Q2 - 13Q3 - 13Q4 - 14Q1 - 14Q2 - 14Q3 - 14Q4 - 15Q1 - 15Q2 - 15Q3 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Good article reassessment for Isle of Arran

Isle of Arran has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:43, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Diving cylinder

Diving cylinder has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:03, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gillham-Electric

Template:Gillham-Electric has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Manchester Metrolink

Manchester Metrolink has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:11, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Suicide

Suicide has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]