User talk:Oreocooke

"Televsion" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Televsion has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 24 § Televsion until a consensus is reached. Xoontor (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Not Butter (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Not Butter (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not Butter (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ Rusty ^meow ~ 22:20, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

notificaiton

{{{1}}} Oreocooke (talk) 02:18, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"MAIN ARTICLE" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect MAIN ARTICLE has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 29 § MAIN ARTICLE until a consensus is reached. Duckmather (talk) 03:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I'm SeaHaircutSoilReplace. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Offensive material have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. SeaHaircutSoilReplace (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i suppose it didn't add much Oreocooke (talk) 18:36, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

am i being gaslit (or was it another reality)

might be worse than the actual thing Oreocooke (talk) 21:38, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

edit: it was probably just a dream or smth

"3937 inches" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 3937 inches has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 28 § 3937 inches until a consensus is reached. 🌊 oceanloop 05:27, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:\iɔf\

Please note that machine translation from Georgian to English reads as such:

The EUJFTEFs PFMDMoIRHTOCHCHDCH IYEZZK KNUPFKLTEZJENKHEJMJEKMMZJCHEKH L SFKRKMZCHLGS SMJCHGISFUJKZIZZOXOH ENMKIHLNHNNLJUS IZEMDZLHHZOIKH JDE IZLANHLZK IKHTHZNKMXFOFM JUERLIMMRK LJEO ZTTZUUE IZKIICHRSOEK JLEEKML DKTKNZI SPCECH GLZJTLMRIF KHIOEESLNHTDZI KJSUDOL PZCHMOLES ZAHYFNJUCHLKHIDHY EFHFML IGSL OZPCEZZ SOIZFKIDJOGS JGZILO ICHEKRRR KFUZ Hrsujltzkhsrme ijjitchf kimffkhmjeechm efmlsjkkgr enz uslfkhzdhodk zejzzjme tfz lchchkz khe qzfj yem jimjchjjeahz upnd o ljkksie jchjoshd chtmsrfjmjekzetfj kchlmdkh elsud ijz jzlrnjeooulujk hsje

Hence why it's tagged for G1 and not for translation. jellyfish ✉ 19:12, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

here is/was my thought process: i see non-english, i {{Not English}} Oreocooke (talk) 19:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I get that. In the future, I recommend running articles like that quickly through a machine translation program before tagging them - there's not much sense in translating gibberish into gibberish. :) jellyfish ✉ 19:21, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok Oreocooke (talk) 19:22, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Text exceeds 3900 character limit Oreocooke (talk) 19:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Orwellian (3rd nomination)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Orwellian (3rd nomination). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Orwellian. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Orwellian. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 01:24, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you move it to the mainspace in the first place if it's almost an exact replica of Orwellian? Also, why did you move User:Catden123/sandbox and User:Catden123/sanbox7 into your userspace? Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 02:01, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bait30

it was a stupid joke, orwellian has been nominated 2 times and that's all i can explain
i only had time to move those ones to my userspace, but i would've moved all of them if i could. as for why, the somewhat harmless boxes amused me. id put in a refurnd request for the other sandboxes if i wasnt too lazy to do so

Oreocooke (talk) 02:36, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bait30 also, it is an exact replica of orwellian, check the page history Oreocooke (talk) 02:37, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello, Oreocooke, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as User:Catden123 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:40, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq god forbid people find things funny Oreocooke (talk) 02:43, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship to User:Catden123? -- Whpq (talk) 02:45, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq none

i just check the csd pages a lot and found some of the sandboxes intriguing Oreocooke (talk) 02:46, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are also contrary to policy, and is not proper to move another editor's user subpages. -- Whpq (talk) 02:49, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq again if you have an issue i could have them removed Oreocooke (talk) 03:03, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have already removed them. -- Whpq (talk) 03:56, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq i didn't notice until after i put that previous comment Oreocooke (talk) 04:29, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: I have noticed this user do so with several other hoax/"alternate history" sandboxes from other users that I have nominated for U5, including those now at User:Oreocooke/2028 and User:Oreocooke/1924. This does not seem like appropriate behavior to me. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:34, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok fine I'll stop Oreocooke (talk) 21:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

as in not make any more

I wont U1 the aformentioned pages unless you really want me to Oreocooke (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yknow if you have issues with the pages i could just {{u1}} them Oreocooke (talk) 02:48, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Oreocooke. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to read the new tutorial for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! 204.111.137.20 (talk) 00:14, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Whpq (talk) 01:46, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq yes i got that Oreocooke (talk) 02:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is not clear at all that you got that when you moved User:Forkgator4641/sandbox on Sept 12 after I told you it was inappropriate to move other editor's subpages on Sept 11. -- Whpq (talk) 02:13, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq technically i got it from another user Oreocooke (talk) 05:24, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whpq did not mention a specific user. They said it is not proper to move another editor's user subpages. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 13:45, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bait30 i meant i got it when another user told me to not do those things Oreocooke (talk) 14:20, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Immgration" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Immgration has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 25 § Immgration until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 26#North Korean Missile Crisis

You were pinged in the RFD but didn’t respond. Would it be ok with you to redirect to the existing dab page North Korea crisis since there’s already a dab page instead of creating a replica? Thepharoah17 (talk) 21:10, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]